BigSlam wrote:Interesting. If true will have to hold out judgement until the $$$$ is known.
On the surface it's hard not to like it though.
Can't be more than the MLE which is still a good deal. Hopefully 2 or 3 years maybe.
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
BigSlam wrote:Interesting. If true will have to hold out judgement until the $$$$ is known.
On the surface it's hard not to like it though.
BigSlam wrote:Interesting. If true will have to hold out judgement until the $$$$ is known.
On the surface it's hard not to like it though.
BigSlam wrote:Interesting. If true will have to hold out judgement until the $$$$ is known.
On the surface it's hard not to like it though.
bfpri wrote:chooses the tanking hornets over the mavs or spurs...
ok...
BlackOutBuzz wrote:BigSlam wrote:Interesting. If true will have to hold out judgement until the $$$$ is known.
On the surface it's hard not to like it though.
Well we literally can't offer more than $5.4m barring a S&T.
EwingSweatsALot wrote:BlackOutBuzz wrote:BigSlam wrote:Interesting. If true will have to hold out judgement until the $$$$ is known.
On the surface it's hard not to like it though.
Well we literally can't offer more than $5.4m barring a S&T.
A steal if the length of the deal goes into the new cap.
EwingSweatsALot wrote:Won't know what to do with a PG that shoots over 40%.
lazard wrote:A bit surprised considering he had stated he was only going to a team where he would be a starter. Maybe they offered a chance for him to compete for the starting position?
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Liver_Pooty wrote:lazard wrote:A bit surprised considering he had stated he was only going to a team where he would be a starter. Maybe they offered a chance for him to compete for the starting position?
Money talks.