ImageImage

Ball Don't Lie: The LaMelo Ball Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
316Hornets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,263
And1: 2,892
Joined: Jun 26, 2015
Location: Milky Way
 

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#221 » by 316Hornets » Sat Oct 24, 2020 10:51 pm

In my opinion, discipline is one of the easiest qualities to fix. It's easy to call an 18 year old kid undisciplined. A harder quality to fix is responsibility. For as big a figure as LaMelo is, he comes across as very mature.
The Charlotte Hornets will win their first round series against the Boston Celtics in the 2021 Playoffs
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#222 » by DY_nasty » Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:26 pm

is he undisciplined for taking bad shots and refusing to play defense consistently? or does he take no responsibility for throwing away possessions with bad shots or losing his man every other time down the court?

this is fun with semantics. easy answer is he needs to own his flaws and fix them
User avatar
geraldwallace
Junior
Posts: 308
And1: 271
Joined: Jul 02, 2017
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#223 » by geraldwallace » Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:35 am

MasterIchiro wrote:Mitch Kupchak has had a long career as a GM. Where is a single example of him taking a home run swing?



Bynum was on most mock drafts a late first and Mitch took him 10th.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,244
And1: 6,257
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#224 » by JMAC3 » Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:36 pm

I’m really starting to come around on Ball.

Think defensively he can be a lot better than people are giving him credit for. Not sure he will ever be a lockdown defender, but his size and length will bother smaller guards. He actually moves his feet pretty well and he plays passing lanes effectively.

For the people who are claiming he is a risk taker and hasn’t played defense at a high level- neither did Lonzo and now he is one of the best defensive pgs in league.

Shooting is an issue for me still but he has such good touch on his floaters and is a high level free throw shooter that I think the tools are there. More so think his percentages are skewed by bad shot selection and deep threes.
wilson115
Starter
Posts: 2,377
And1: 1,583
Joined: Aug 21, 2020
 

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#225 » by wilson115 » Wed Oct 28, 2020 12:11 pm

Would Lamelo's talent outweigh his trade value if he's there at #3? What's a realistic haul?
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,768
And1: 16,749
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#226 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:47 pm

JMAC3 wrote:I’m really starting to come around on Ball.

Think defensively he can be a lot better than people are giving him credit for. Not sure he will ever be a lockdown defender, but his size and length will bother smaller guards. He actually moves his feet pretty well and he plays passing lanes effectively.

For the people who are claiming he is a risk taker and hasn’t played defense at a high level- neither did Lonzo and now he is one of the best defensive pgs in league.

Shooting is an issue for me still but he has such good touch on his floaters and is a high level free throw shooter that I think the tools are there. More so think his percentages are skewed by bad shot selection and deep threes.


His shot selection can also be skewed by playing in a lower tier league. Hell, Monk and Bacon go to the D league and fire up 40 shots with maybe a fourth of them being "good shots", and we don't bat an eye.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Rays Pompadour
Senior
Posts: 648
And1: 488
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#227 » by Rays Pompadour » Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:12 pm

wilson115 wrote:Would Lamelo's talent outweigh his trade value if he's there at #3? What's a realistic haul?


That's an outstanding question. I love the value Charlotte has at #3, which is essentially a #1 overall pick for three evenly flawed players. Ball has the highest value of all the other lottery prospects, in my opinion.

I ask for #1 compensation, which in this draft may mean a lottery pick, a second first rounder and a lottery protected 2021 first rounder. I don't need a player in return, per se. If I let #3 go, I'm banking on the future.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#228 » by DY_nasty » Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:12 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:I’m really starting to come around on Ball.

Think defensively he can be a lot better than people are giving him credit for. Not sure he will ever be a lockdown defender, but his size and length will bother smaller guards. He actually moves his feet pretty well and he plays passing lanes effectively.

For the people who are claiming he is a risk taker and hasn’t played defense at a high level- neither did Lonzo and now he is one of the best defensive pgs in league.

Shooting is an issue for me still but he has such good touch on his floaters and is a high level free throw shooter that I think the tools are there. More so think his percentages are skewed by bad shot selection and deep threes.


His shot selection can also be skewed by playing in a lower tier league. Hell, Monk and Bacon go to the D league and fire up 40 shots with maybe a fourth of them being "good shots", and we don't bat an eye.

we also don't hype it either lol
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,760
And1: 10,089
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#229 » by amcoolio » Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:38 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,760
And1: 10,089
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#230 » by amcoolio » Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:41 pm

I watched a few of the later episodes of "Ball in the Family" or whatever...

I know he is young and needs to mature, but wow is that someone I don't want near our players. He has no focus whatsoever. He doesn't put extra time in, only the minimum required. He doesn't seem to care about basketball, only as a means to get rich and famous. I'm perfectly fine passing on him and letting him bust/blossom somewhere else.
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,919
And1: 11,122
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#231 » by LofJ » Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:59 pm

I'm not used to seeing this team play the media game like this. In the last few days we've talked up Wiseman and threw shade at Ball. That's unusual for this team, it makes me think we want Ball to fall.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#232 » by MasterIchiro » Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:21 pm

LofJ wrote:I'm not used to seeing this team play the media game like this. In the last few days we've talked up Wiseman and threw shade at Ball. That's unusual for this team, it makes me think we want Ball to fall.


???

Bonnell's sources are other teams' speculation. He has no internal sources telling him the team likes Wiseman, that Edwards is their backup plan, that Ball is flunking interviews. Nowhere does Bonnell claim internal sources. In fact he explicitly said the Wiseman rumor is speculation from 2 of the top 10 lotto teams.

This is what beat writers do when they don't have a trusted relationship with an organization. They sell rumors for the Charlotte Observer for clicks, so they can lock down greater job security. Bonnell is locked out of Kupchak's inner circle. That's why Bonnell is hunting around the league for aftermarket speculation. Kupchak has been around a long time and he's not going to let Rick Bonnell compromise this critical selection or foil Kupchak's hand. Kupchak has a very solid hand.
It has been written...
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#233 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:41 pm

LaMelo is the one guy that I absolutely don't want out of the top prospects.
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#234 » by BigSlam » Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:07 am

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:LaMelo is the one guy that I absolutely don't want out of the top prospects.

I was so-so on him but remained hopeful that if we did draft him he’d ultimately hit this incredibly high ceiling some say he has.

But all these recent reports of poor interviewing sure does move the needle from “so-so” to “do not want”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
B B M F 'ers
Rays Pompadour
Senior
Posts: 648
And1: 488
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#235 » by Rays Pompadour » Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:44 am

Maybe Ball is trying to tank his way to NY?
Chapelchilla
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,903
And1: 1,324
Joined: Aug 04, 2014
         

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#236 » by Chapelchilla » Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:07 pm

Rays Pompadour wrote:Maybe Ball is trying to tank his way to NY?


If we draft him at 3, I hope we are trading him there for 8 and something nice
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,768
And1: 16,749
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#237 » by Liver_Pooty » Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:17 pm

Teams later in the lottery could be leaking false information to Bunnell trying to hurt his stock as well.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,919
And1: 11,122
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#238 » by LofJ » Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:15 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:Teams later in the lottery could be leaking false information to Bunnell trying to hurt his stock as well.


Or to lower the price, either way the Hornets organization should have pulled some strings years ago to get the Charlotte Observer to replace Bonnell.

Rod Boone needs a job, it's time for Rick to retire.
User avatar
316Hornets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,263
And1: 2,892
Joined: Jun 26, 2015
Location: Milky Way
 

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#239 » by 316Hornets » Fri Oct 30, 2020 4:21 pm

DY_nasty wrote:is he undisciplined for taking bad shots and refusing to play defense consistently? or does he take no responsibility for throwing away possessions with bad shots or losing his man every other time down the court?

this is fun with semantics. easy answer is he needs to own his flaws and fix them


Speaking of semantics, many people here like to poke fun at the path Lamelo took to make it this far. So, are we saying he played at a highly competitive level or are we saying he played at mostly an exhibition level. Because if he has played mostly at an exhibition level, he should be granted a little more leeway in the results. I'm more focused on what he can do and not what he didn't do.
The Charlotte Hornets will win their first round series against the Boston Celtics in the 2021 Playoffs
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,302
And1: 15,516
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Prospect Thread: LaMelo Ball 

Post#240 » by yosemiteben » Fri Oct 30, 2020 4:25 pm

316Hornets wrote:
DY_nasty wrote:is he undisciplined for taking bad shots and refusing to play defense consistently? or does he take no responsibility for throwing away possessions with bad shots or losing his man every other time down the court?

this is fun with semantics. easy answer is he needs to own his flaws and fix them


Speaking of semantics, many people here like to poke fun at the path Lamelo took to make it this far. So, are we saying he played at a highly competitive level or are we saying he played at mostly an exhibition level. Because if he has played mostly at an exhibition level, he should be granted a little more leeway in the results. I'm more focused on what he can do and not what he didn't do.

He has not played in competitive leagues. Your theory of "people in crappy leagues should be given more leeway in their results" sure is an interesting theory in how to judge prospects.

Return to Charlotte Hornets