ImageImage

Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA)

Moderators: yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam

User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,317
And1: 6,288
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#261 » by JMAC3 » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:30 pm

LofJ wrote:You guys are seriously criticizing the team for not paying Kaminsky? Paying mediocre players in the past is why the team is in such a bad situation.


Frank at 4.5 million isn’t paying him... that’s a steal for any center in the league let alone one who can stretch the floor.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
BlackOutBuzz
Hornets Forum Capologist
Posts: 7,795
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
Location: Burlington, NC
       

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#262 » by BlackOutBuzz » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:33 pm

This is interesting because if you're losing Kemba than you can conceivably keep Frank, especially at his QO. Think this points to them still operating under the assumption that Kemba will still be here... hope they're right.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Hornets Picks by Year
2021: Bouknight, Jones, Thor, Lewis

Protection on future 1st* (to NYK); 2nds
2022: 1-18; CHA (31-55), TOR 2 (55-60)
2023: 1-16; BOS (GH)
2024: 1-14; BOS (GH)
2025: 1-14; CHA (31-55)
*Becomes two 2nds if unconveyed
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,955
And1: 11,159
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#263 » by LofJ » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:34 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
LofJ wrote:You guys are seriously criticizing the team for not paying Kaminsky? Paying mediocre players in the past is why the team is in such a bad situation.


Frank at 4.5 million isn’t paying him... that’s a steal for any center in the league let alone one who can stretch the floor.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


I disagree, it's easy to find decent rotation big men for less than 5 million. Kaminsky didn't want to be here anyway, the team did him a favor.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,317
And1: 6,288
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#264 » by JMAC3 » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:39 pm

LofJ wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
LofJ wrote:You guys are seriously criticizing the team for not paying Kaminsky? Paying mediocre players in the past is why the team is in such a bad situation.


Frank at 4.5 million isn’t paying him... that’s a steal for any center in the league let alone one who can stretch the floor.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


I disagree, it's easy to find decent rotation big men for less than 5 million. Kaminsky didn't want to be here anyway, the team did him a favor.


Not to bring them to charlotte... maybe if you are golden state or lakers, but we have to overpay to get guys.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,955
And1: 11,159
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#265 » by LofJ » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:41 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
LofJ wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
Frank at 4.5 million isn’t paying him... that’s a steal for any center in the league let alone one who can stretch the floor.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


I disagree, it's easy to find decent rotation big men for less than 5 million. Kaminsky didn't want to be here anyway, the team did him a favor.


Not to bring them to charlotte... maybe if you are golden state or lakers, but we have to overpay to get guys.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Alex Len is better than Kaminsky and he signed for less than $5 million to play for a tanking team.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,317
And1: 6,288
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#266 » by JMAC3 » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:43 pm

LofJ wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
LofJ wrote:
I disagree, it's easy to find decent rotation big men for less than 5 million. Kaminsky didn't want to be here anyway, the team did him a favor.


Not to bring them to charlotte... maybe if you are golden state or lakers, but we have to overpay to get guys.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Alex Len is better than Kaminsky and he signed for less than $5 million to play for a tanking team.


I don’t agree he is better and he also signed with the chance of being a starter.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Rich4114
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 4,685
Joined: Mar 11, 2004
Location: PA
   

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#267 » by Rich4114 » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:46 pm

Here's the think with Frank. He was literally almost released after the trade deadline last season. He also takes up a roster spot in the front court that we probably want to give to PJ. They also can't afford him (or Lamb) if Kemba actually does re-sign. And if Kemba doesn't re-sign, Frank isn't exactly going to continue to develop into something different from what he is. So I can see the decision making perfect sense.

One of the worst decisions of all time is not taking the Celtics deal. Even if a lot of the details involved in that are total BS (I believe they are) we knew what was happening with our roster/salary cap situation and punting on a late lotto pick for future assets would've added flexibility/security that we now wish we had. That Memphis pick is looking pretty decent.
Great
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 65
Joined: May 28, 2007
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#268 » by Great » Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:48 pm

Hernangomez essentially can do what Kaminsky does, for less money.

Cheick Diallo’s athleticism, length, and shot blocking would make more sense for Kaminsky’s money or less.

They have to thin out the players who are near redundant in ability and skill.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,424
And1: 15,620
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#269 » by yosemiteben » Thu Jun 27, 2019 6:03 pm

BlackOutBuzz wrote:This is interesting because if you're losing Kemba than you can conceivably keep Frank, especially at his QO. Think this points to them still operating under the assumption that Kemba will still be here... hope they're right.

Yeah, my initial thought is this is good news with regard to Kemba. Although it was pretty obvious that this was coming when we drafted PJ.

I also think it's pretty clear now that Marv isn't getting traded for space, not that there was a super high probability of that happening.
Chapelchilla
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,989
And1: 1,412
Joined: Aug 04, 2014
         

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#270 » by Chapelchilla » Thu Jun 27, 2019 6:06 pm

Wow. Another kick to nads. Frank is going to sign with a team like MIL and make us look even more like idiots with his “sudden” improvement.
Dude should have been the starting center for us for the last 2 years and will probably put up 12/6 next season
powerforward
Junior
Posts: 409
And1: 59
Joined: Nov 04, 2006

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#271 » by powerforward » Thu Jun 27, 2019 6:06 pm

frank is better then willy but that really doesn't matter- I think frank will be decent and a valuable get for somebody.
But man we just stink at drafting never got the best player that we could have and never drafted bad enough to get real busts that keep us bad enough to keep getting high picks.

Instead of frank what would our team look like with myles turner or even better booker?
Much less how different would things be if we drafted kawhi or klay instead of biz?
Giannis instead of cody?
Beal or lillard instead of mkg?
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#272 » by BigSlam » Thu Jun 27, 2019 6:20 pm

Chapelchilla wrote:Wow. Another kick to nads. Frank is going to sign with a team like MIL and make us look even more like idiots with his “sudden” improvement.
Dude should have been the starting center for us for the last 2 years and will probably put up 12/6 next season

But give up 28/14 to his opposing player.....
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,359
And1: 15,906
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#273 » by fatlever » Thu Jun 27, 2019 6:24 pm

Forgetting about the mistake made on draft night for a second, this is another example of why we need to be more ruthless with our young players. If a guy isn't developing after two or three years cut-bait and trade him for whatever you can.

Frank isn't in our long-term plans and he doesn't have any trade value. No real point in hanging on to him now, we already missed the opportunity to get value from him a year-and-a-half ago.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,359
And1: 15,906
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#274 » by fatlever » Thu Jun 27, 2019 6:26 pm

For example, I would give monk until about December to show that he's made a huge step forward in his progress. If not, I'd look to trade him for whatever, even if it was second round picks.

Not to derail the thread, if anybody wants to reply to that feel free to do it in the monk thread.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
hotrod
Veteran
Posts: 2,524
And1: 150
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#275 » by hotrod » Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:17 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=21
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,557
And1: 6,504
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#276 » by SWedd523 » Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:50 pm

fatlever wrote:Forgetting about the mistake made on draft night for a second, this is another example of why we need to be more ruthless with our young players. If a guy isn't developing after two or three years cut-bait and trade him for whatever you can.

Frank isn't in our long-term plans and he doesn't have any trade value. No real point in hanging on to him now, we already missed the opportunity to get value from him a year-and-a-half ago.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app

Sticky this post at the top of every player thread. It can't be restated enough.

Too many people in here are reactive instead of proactive. Like four months ago Kaminsky was a bum and didn't need to be extended and blah blah.

Now they're idiots for not bringing him back.

They're idiots for not looking to trade him and his bird rights because they should've seen that he hadn't/wouldn't develop into a worthy starting player.

Resigning mediocre guys to long contracts is exactly what delivered us to the mess we're currently watching unfold. Cut the loss and move on.
Image
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,825
And1: 10,162
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#277 » by amcoolio » Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:53 pm

Kaminsky is going to look good somewhere else, but there's nothing we can do about that now. Out with the Cho regime, time to start fresh.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#278 » by DY_nasty » Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:59 pm

i liked him more than willie but that aint saying much

hope he finds his stride elsewhere
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,359
And1: 15,906
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#279 » by fatlever » Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:02 pm

SWedd523 wrote:
fatlever wrote:Forgetting about the mistake made on draft night for a second, this is another example of why we need to be more ruthless with our young players. If a guy isn't developing after two or three years cut-bait and trade him for whatever you can.

Frank isn't in our long-term plans and he doesn't have any trade value. No real point in hanging on to him now, we already missed the opportunity to get value from him a year-and-a-half ago.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app

Sticky this post at the top of every player thread. It can't be restated enough.

Too many people in here are reactive instead of proactive. Like four months ago Kaminsky was a bum and didn't need to be extended and blah blah.

Now they're idiots for not bringing him back.

They're idiots for not looking to trade him and his bird rights because they should've seen that he hadn't/wouldn't develop into a worthy starting player.

Resigning mediocre guys to long contracts is exactly what delivered us to the mess we're currently watching unfold. Cut the loss and move on.


same reason why it never made sense to talk about resigning lamb to a 10-15 mil deal. thats just marvin, mkg, all over again. always some dude in the gleague/late 1st/2nd/europe/end of a bench - who can get you 80% of that production for 90% less money.
User avatar
Snidely FC
Head Coach
Posts: 6,353
And1: 3,633
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Frank Kaminsky #2 - Not Extended (UFA) 

Post#280 » by Snidely FC » Thu Jun 27, 2019 9:48 pm

The BOS BS and revisionist histories about Myles Turner and Devin Booker aside, I remember that night the feeling that the decision was Justice Winslow or Frank Kaminsky. Winslow was a Duke stud, a future star. How had he fallen to us? I was listening to the draft on XM NBA Radio, and remember a rush of excitement when DET passed on Winslow. OMG, omg, we're gonna get Justice Winslow!" And then I remember bashing the steering wheel and yelling, "Nooooooooo."

Return to Charlotte Hornets