Cathouse Draft! - Fatty

hhvo · Post #41 » by **hhvo** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:10 pm

Can I suggest adding another category? NBA/Prof Athlete's wife/girlfriend, there's some really good ones out there.

Post #42 » by **fatlever** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:11 pm

hhvo wrote:Can I suggest adding another category? NBA/Prof Athlete's wife/girlfriend, there's some really good ones out there.

you missed out, we did WAGs as part of the summer fun draft that we just finished.

hhvo · Post #43 » by **hhvo** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:40 pm

Damn, this would have been a good one.

Post #44 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:59 pm

Had her last year.

Post #45 » by **Paydro70** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:42 am

I think Fats took her as her WAG in the summer fun? She is eligible for Hispanic (despite being Brazilian). Otherwise you better be Brazilian.

Post #46 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:47 am

Why is she eligible?

Post #47 » by **Paydro70** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:50 am

As Hispanic? Would white be better? I'd really just like to encourage as much diversity in looks as possible, so I was hoping those 4 categories (white/black/asian/hispanic) would cover the continents and make sure anybody could be drafted.

Post #48 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:56 am

Didn't know if she had a weird qualifier. So we're considering people from Spanish speaking countries (and Brazil) as hispanic? Asian= continental?

Post #49 » by **Paydro70** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:58 am

Yeah, my intention is for Asian to cover Arab, South Asian, and East Asian. Black covers African and African-American, Hispanic to do Latin America. I think it's just easier to throw Brazilians in with Hispanics even though they obviously aren't Spanish-speakers.

doc.end · Post #50 » by **doc.end** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:57 am

Paydro70 wrote:As Hispanic? Would white be better? I'd really just like to encourage as much diversity in looks as possible, so I was hoping those 4 categories (white/black/asian/hispanic) would cover the continents and make sure anybody could be drafted.

Well speaking of it, one from each continent would be a nice division too. There is always next time, we may expand for more categories then, whatever.

doc.end · Post #51 » by **doc.end** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:03 pm

Walt Cronkite wrote:Didn't know if she had a weird qualifier. So we're considering people from Spanish speaking countries (and Brazil) as hispanic? Asian= continental?

I will giggle at any Spanish beauty in white category. Never understood why Hispanic is a stand alone race in US point of view. (well I could imagine why, but for us Europeans it is still bizarre).

No big deal in this fun draft of course.

Funny is that chikipeadia has White, Latino, Asian, Black, Mixed and Other.

Post #52 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:49 pm

Yea, that comes up a lot on the gb when someone calls Manu or Scola or whoever a Euro. Continents isn't a bad idea at all, but it could lead to a return of the "parade of white women" like last year.

Post #53 » by **fatlever** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:29 pm

i think i drafted like 3 asian beauties last year

Post #54 » by **fatlever** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:38 pm

are there really that many hot tall chicks to make it an every year category?

Post #55 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:55 pm

There were quite a few 5'11 girls last year that I kept finding. 6' was really challenging. chickipedia makes it pretty easy.

doc.end · Post #56 » by **doc.end** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:00 pm

Tall is no problem category, well, it requires a research if original choice would be picked but to me it is obvious where to look for those. To me small category is much harder (or maybe I chould check other sources than chickipedia to find out some 5'2" are actually 5'1"). I guess anything under 5'1" and a half is a fair game, right?

Well races, I have done some research to prevent reaches in those categories but I may still hold chickipedia categories for claiming eligibility in one category.

EDIT: I made notes 5'1'' - and 5'11''+ just to fool myself :oops:

Post #57 » by **Paydro70** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:11 pm

It says 5'2" or shorter, doc.

Continents would entail expanding the draft another 2 categories, and in a way that would over-represent white people (North America, Europe, and Australia are all most likely to be filled with whites). Races are made-up categories anyway, I just wanted to make sure there was some variety and those 4 groups I think will ensure that.

Battery · Post #58 » by **Battery** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:58 pm

I'd like to play...

Post #59 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:31 pm

Would love for Battery to make picks, you're in.

Post #60 » by **Paydro70** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:15 pm

Agreed, indispensable.

At the moment it's the following volunteers:
1) Paydro (Perth Amboy/Poughkeepsie, Ireland/Italy)
2) Walt (Raleigh, Netherlands/England)
3) Fats (Charlotte, France/Ireland)
4) Slam (Melbourne, England)
5) Battery (??)
6) Fred (Bremen, Russia/Netherlands)
7) Doc.end (Prague, Czech/Austria)
8) Ball Teacher (Las Vegas, uhh... Africa? and Louisiana)
9) hhvo (Greensboro, Vietnam)

So we're still short one volunteer? How is that possible? Where is Thruthefire when you need him? Wtf is SWEDD up to? This is the Cathouse draft dammit!

BTW Battery, let us know your hometown and country of ancestry.