ImageImage

The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 - Off the Cliff we go

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
Snidely FC
Head Coach
Posts: 6,339
And1: 3,620
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#421 » by Snidely FC » Thu Mar 9, 2017 2:53 pm

Agreed, but still impressed by what Spoelstra gets out of his journeymen, castoffs, and youths. Having to play them makes him stretch as a coach.

Plus sadly Cliff's choice to not play Weber is Roberts.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,198
And1: 45,798
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#422 » by JDR720 » Thu Mar 9, 2017 5:00 pm

Cliff is just a very stubborn coach, you obviously see it on his reluctance to bench rob / sess or try new things.

He plays favorites too. Which is irritating.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,490
And1: 9,284
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#423 » by Braggins » Thu Mar 9, 2017 7:19 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:Clifford has cited GSW... as examples. Even their "small lineups" had cumulative length and size advantages against most opponents.

Here is the standing reach of Golden States "death lineup" from the past two season compared to some of our players (from draftexpress).

Steph Curry - 8'1" (Kemba - 7'7.5")
Klay Thompson - 8'7.5" (Lamb - 8'6")
Andre Iguodala - 8'9.5" (Batum - 8'8.75)
Harrison Barnes - 8'5.5" (MKG - 8'8.5")
Draymond Green - 8'9" (Marv - 9' / Frank - 9'1.5" / Cody - 8'10")

With Marv/Frank at center that lineup would have essentially the same cumulative length 1-5 as the Warriors, despite Kemba having a 5.5" disadvantage compared to the next least lengthiest player. We'd actually have more length 2-5 with any of the center options.
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,010
And1: 8,496
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#424 » by Hornet Mania » Thu Mar 9, 2017 9:37 pm

JDR720 wrote:Cliff is just a very stubborn coach, you obviously see it on his reluctance to bench rob / sess or try new things.

He plays favorites too. Which is irritating.


It's what irritates me about Cliff most, by far.

It was the same way with Biz and Maxiell.Or leaving Al in a last-second defensive possession when we know damn well he's one of our worst defenders.
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#425 » by Mystical Apples » Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:16 am

Braggins wrote:
Mystical Apples wrote:Clifford has cited GSW... as examples. Even their "small lineups" had cumulative length and size advantages against most opponents.

Here is the standing reach of Golden States "death lineup" from the past two season compared to some of our players (from draftexpress).

Steph Curry - 8'1" (Kemba - 7'7.5")
Klay Thompson - 8'7.5" (Lamb - 8'6")
Andre Iguodala - 8'9.5" (Batum - 8'8.75)
Harrison Barnes - 8'5.5" (MKG - 8'8.5")
Draymond Green - 8'9" (Marv - 9' / Frank - 9'1.5" / Cody - 8'10")

With Marv/Frank at center that lineup would have essentially the same cumulative length 1-5 as the Warriors, despite Kemba having a 5.5" disadvantage compared to the next least lengthiest player. We'd actually have more length 2-5 with any of the center options.


You removed "size" which I included for a reason (and Miami), specifically as it pertains to 1-3 and the ability to switch up and down. Kemba isn't gonna defend 2's, Lamb isn't gonna defend large 3's and 4's, Frank and Cody wont consistently stick 2's, and no one possess Draymond's defensive abilities although MKG is close.

Lack of depth and/or a basket protector makes consistently employing the strategy problematic too.....IE GSW rolled with Bogut or Ezeli at 5 and have Livingston compared to Sessions or Roberts. If you watch CHA's second unit they switch far less than 1st.

Not saying CHA won't eventually get there - in fact I believe that's why Frank was drafted - but without the elite rim protector CHA needs to outscore opponents + switchier on defense and as of right now they're short offensive fire power and the aforementioned wing.
geometry
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#426 » by Mystical Apples » Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:25 am

Boston has similar issues with IT, Bradley, and Horford but they've been outscoring teams since mid-December (#1 in Q4 scoring). Plus defensively they have Smart off the bench, not Sessions and Roberts

Unfortunately Charlotte is 27th for Q4 scoring. Actually, 28th if GSW is excluded.

http://stats.nba.com/teams/advanced/#!?sort=OFF_RATING&dir=1&Season=2016-17&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Period=4&DateFrom=12%2F18%2F2016
geometry
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#427 » by Eoghan » Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:20 am

So it's not Clifford's fault, it's Kemba's. Got it. I blame Cho for drafting that little chucker.
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#428 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:53 am

No one talking about Cliff's post game comments that he couldn't reach this year's team?
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
User avatar
316Hornets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,258
And1: 2,890
Joined: Jun 26, 2015
Location: Milky Way
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#429 » by 316Hornets » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:55 am

Cliff is building a relationship. Last season the players gave a lot, now Cliff has to give a lot. You can't be a drill sergeant to millionaires.
The Charlotte Hornets will win their first round series against the Boston Celtics in the 2021 Playoffs
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,066
And1: 15,639
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#430 » by fatlever » Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:16 am

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:No one talking about Cliff's post game comments that he couldn't reach this year's team?


Cliff sounded like a coach who was at wits end and possibly feeling the pressure of being on the hot seat. It's never a good sign when a coach feels like he is not getting through to his players. Are they tuning him out or just not responding to his message any longer?

If Cliff feels like he hasn't been able to get through to this team, as constructed, what is the point of bring back the same team and same coach next year? Why would you expected different results with the same ingredients? Does this signal some big trades this summer or a coaching change?
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,066
And1: 15,639
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#431 » by fatlever » Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:18 am

I posted this in the game thread, but makes sense to leave it here as well. Who is not getting back on defense? Who, other than Lamb, is he talking about?

Read on Twitter
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,499
And1: 6,461
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#432 » by SWedd523 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:35 am

316Hornets wrote:Cliff is building a relationship. Last season the players gave a lot, now Cliff has to give a lot. You can't be a drill sergeant to millionaires.

Cliff is a cuddle bear compared to a drill sergeant
Image
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,287
And1: 15,507
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#433 » by yosemiteben » Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:47 am

fatlever wrote:Who is not getting back on defense? Who, other than Lamb, is he talking about?

Marco
Batum
Kemba when he's too busy bitching about calls

I think his points about not buying in and getting back is a season long thing, not only this game.
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,496
And1: 20,842
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#434 » by Diop » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:40 am

SWedd523 wrote:
316Hornets wrote:Cliff is building a relationship. Last season the players gave a lot, now Cliff has to give a lot. You can't be a drill sergeant to millionaires.

Cliff is a cuddle bear compared to a drill sergeant

<Insert full metal jacket clip here>
Image
BobsBuddy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,377
And1: 100
Joined: Jul 27, 2008

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#435 » by BobsBuddy » Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:52 am

:nonono: :noway: Kemba and Lamb were good on offense last night,but below average on defense. It seems like we don't want to play defense. 3 options:
Get a coaching staff like Phoenix and forget defense.
Trade for defensive minded players.
Do nothing and suck.
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#436 » by Mystical Apples » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:01 pm

Yeah Q4 transition D has been a problem all season. Effort is an issue and so is style.....lots of downhill attacking and/or getting shots blocked leading to baskets going the other direction.

And being last in Q4 offensive transition just compounds matters without the consistent 1b half court scoring option. In fact, I'd say at least 25% of what appears to be defensive problems are actually offensive problems that lead to inefficient defense.
geometry
TinmanZBoy
General Manager
Posts: 7,803
And1: 5,122
Joined: Jul 11, 2015
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#437 » by TinmanZBoy » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:40 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:Yeah Q4 transition D has been a problem all season. Effort is an issue and so is style.....lots of downhill attacking and/or getting shots blocked leading to baskets going the other direction.

And being last in Q4 offensive transition just compounds matters without the consistent 1b half court scoring option. In fact, I'd say at least 25% of what appears to be defensive problems are actually offensive problems that lead to inefficient defense.


agree
Hi Clutchie, I love you... :kiss
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,066
And1: 15,639
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#438 » by fatlever » Wed Mar 29, 2017 9:10 pm

Clifford ranked 17th out of 30 coaches this year by ESPN

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/19024161/coach-ratings-1-30

Middle of the pack is about what I expected.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,490
And1: 9,284
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#439 » by Braggins » Thu Apr 6, 2017 1:51 am

Apparently we broke the record for most 3pt FGs allowed in a season.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,287
And1: 15,507
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: RE: Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#440 » by yosemiteben » Thu Apr 6, 2017 1:57 am

Braggins wrote:Apparently we broke the record for most 3pt FGs allowed in a season.

6 of the top 7 all time are from this season. 7 of the top 10. 14 of the top 20.

Return to Charlotte Hornets