



Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
BobsBuddy wrote::nonono:![]()
Charlotte just got rid of some major baggage the last 2 years in TT and BG.There is team chemstry in our locker room now..I don't care if we can get LS for $1.38...He will screw up this team..CHO'S Plan and any hopes of advancing in the playoffs.. As for his off the court activites,if there anythng like on the court, watch out...
dmutombo321 wrote:This team needs an infusion of talent and it just so happens that Stephenson is the most talented young FA available who also happens to play at a position of need (SG). Houston will keep Parsons under contract next year so he wont be available.
Stephenson's problem is not that he is lazy. Unlike Tyrus or Derrick Coleman, he is by all accounts a dedicated worker when it comes to improving his game and training. His problem is that he is arrogant and somewhat eccentric. This should be factored in when pricing his FA value but should not be a disqualifier if they can land the guy at the right price. Eccentric personalities can be managed or at the very least tempered with the right veterans and staff.
Chicago did it with Rodman and Charlotte, as noted, also did at already with Jackson, a player who had a history of cold clocking fans during a game and engaging in late night gun battles outside titty bars. Blowing in LeBron's ear and making some smart-ass remarks to the media looks pale in comparison.
So far as I'm aware, despite Stephenson's well documented lapses in judgement relating to basketball etiquette, he hasnt been in any recent trouble with the law during the past two years.
MasterIchiro wrote:The catch is we have to treat the draft assuming no free agent is a guarantee. And we need to draft a SG to bump Henderson.
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:The problems stated before the trade.
Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums mobile app
MasterIchiro wrote:Of course no rookie can bump Henderson, at least not right away. That's what I like about Afflalo - he does. And then he's a 2 year commitment, whereas signing Lance would block a SG for the long term. If you get your heart set on Lance you're eliminating the strongest position in the draft SG especially making matters worse when you consider the glut of SG talent around our draft slot at 9 or even 24. It makes sense to draft a SG in a draft deep with SG when you need one. It saves money from a long term financial commitment to Lance or any other SG free agent.
Then what do you do if Lance doesn't sign?
Bassman wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:Of course no rookie can bump Henderson, at least not right away. That's what I like about Afflalo - he does. And then he's a 2 year commitment, whereas signing Lance would block a SG for the long term. If you get your heart set on Lance you're eliminating the strongest position in the draft SG especially making matters worse when you consider the glut of SG talent around our draft slot at 9 or even 24. It makes sense to draft a SG in a draft deep with SG when you need one. It saves money from a long term financial commitment to Lance or any other SG free agent.
Then what do you do if Lance doesn't sign?
This is why I want to trade up to 5 for our choice of Vohnel or Randle. I like Noah best. Getting one of those studs would be a coup. Adding Lance would be ideal. Hope we could include He do or Neal within the trade up and keep our 24th pick to get a wing player. Sign a PG in free agency and we're golden.
PG - Kemba, Williams
SG - Lance, Henderson, draft.pick
SF - Hyphen, CDR
PF - Noah, Zeller
C - Big Al, Biz
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
MasterIchiro wrote:Look bottom line is I think there's better value in drafting Stauskas than signing Lance Stephenson especially since we don't know if Stephenson will even sign.
The arrangement seals it for me if we can dump Henderson in the process, gain Afflalo to continue to win now and use Lance's money to help sign Greg Monroe to be a PF/C for 2 years, a C in training as a prodigy of Al. Kanter raves about how much he learned under Al and so does Favors. Those guys miss him. I bet he's a great coach and a tutor. Greg Monroe has plenty of talent to learn from Al.
BrotherDave wrote:I'd rather draft a good PF/C and let him go to school with Biz and CZ under Professor Al than trade/sign for Monroe. Monroe is an NBA veteran and will get a big paycheck so rules him out as an Al apprentice IMO.
I feel like there are two teams, the current Al window team and the young, developing foundation of MKG, Biz, Zeller, Kemba, Taylor and this year's rookies. Ideally if we could sign Lance to a short-term "prove you're not insane" contract that would be the way to go, it's not like there are hardly any better uses of the cap space.
MasterIchiro wrote:BrotherDave wrote:I'd rather draft a good PF/C and let him go to school with Biz and CZ under Professor Al than trade/sign for Monroe. Monroe is an NBA veteran and will get a big paycheck so rules him out as an Al apprentice IMO.
I feel like there are two teams, the current Al window team and the young, developing foundation of MKG, Biz, Zeller, Kemba, Taylor and this year's rookies. Ideally if we could sign Lance to a short-term "prove you're not insane" contract that would be the way to go, it's not like there are hardly any better uses of the cap space.
It's a good plan and I would embrace it if I felt Lance can be signed for 2 years. I don't. I think he'll get 4. Henderson got 3 for chrissakes.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.