BigSlam wrote:This Plumlee narrative is off base IMO. Reminds me of the "Bridges is a liability on defense" narrative that was relentlessly pushed a few years back that just didn't hold any water.
Allen didn't go full Wilt Chamberlin when Plumlee was in there, it was only when Plumlee checked out and PJ was in that Allen rammed 5 consecutive dunks down our throats.
Ideally Plumlee is a back up 5 and we have a stud starting 5 he's playing behind, but I wonder how much currently having a muppet as a back up 5 is hurting more than anything.
I didn't know that Plumlee was such a donkey at the FT line - that is 100% a problem, and there are no doubt much better options we would ideally have, but that's not always possible and Plumlee was.
It is funny: Swedd is 100% right - considering so many write off the center position as something that can be "easily addressed in FA or by signing an UDFA from the G League" and how "the center position doesn't matter at all in today's NBA" and how "you should NEVER use more than a 2nd round draft pick on a center and never, ever, EVER use a top 10 on one"..............we sure do hear a lot of bitching and moaning about the center position in these parts year over year over year.
That's because year after year, the Hornets fail to invest in the position. And, no, using second round picks is not a valid investment. Adding Plumlee was a good deal for a decent player. But he's not the investment the Hornets need. Richards...Big Vern...Jones...all years away from being years away. And Borrego won't play them. They wont even get some burn in Greensboro, so where's the development? Practice? Bah.
As long as the Hornets look away from investing in the center position, we'll continue to bitch about it. Or at least I will.