ImageImage

2020 Off-season Discussion

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,499
And1: 6,461
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#821 » by SWedd523 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:49 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
316Hornets wrote:Would you rather have 9M to spend or 2 future 2nds? If we're still rebuilding, those draft picks matter more imo.

We can buy a 2nd in any draft for a hell of a lot less than $4.5M in cash, so give me the cap space.

Preach it
Image
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,751
And1: 10,081
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#822 » by amcoolio » Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:50 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:
amcoolio wrote:Oh boy, two 2nd round picks. That'll make me feel better.


It should


I would have asked for 4 second round picks. I mean would Boston still have said no to the TPE?? :lol:
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,499
And1: 6,461
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#823 » by SWedd523 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:50 pm

316Hornets wrote:Shams Charania
@ShamsCharania
·
2m
Sources: Celtics are sending 2023 and 2024 second-round picks to Charlotte for a conditional 2022 second-round pick to complete Hayward/Hornets trade.

LMAO were gonna send them the 35th pick for picks 52 and 55

Gotta love it
Image
User avatar
James Gatz
Veteran
Posts: 2,727
And1: 693
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#824 » by James Gatz » Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:51 pm

SWedd523 wrote:
316Hornets wrote:Shams Charania
@ShamsCharania
·
2m
Sources: Celtics are sending 2023 and 2024 second-round picks to Charlotte for a conditional 2022 second-round pick to complete Hayward/Hornets trade.

LMAO were gonna send them the 35th pick for picks 52 and 55

Gotta love it


I'm betting it'll be top 55 protected. Still two late 2nds isn't much to be excited about.
vorbis
Veteran
Posts: 2,889
And1: 788
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#825 » by vorbis » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:27 pm

James Gatz wrote:
SWedd523 wrote:
316Hornets wrote:Shams Charania
@ShamsCharania
·
2m
Sources: Celtics are sending 2023 and 2024 second-round picks to Charlotte for a conditional 2022 second-round pick to complete Hayward/Hornets trade.

LMAO were gonna send them the 35th pick for picks 52 and 55

Gotta love it


I'm betting it'll be top 55 protected. Still two late 2nds isn't much to be excited about.


BOOM already recouped the 2024 2nd rounder they sent out for Nick Richards #makingmoves #9dchess
CuseMayne
Starter
Posts: 2,017
And1: 1,506
Joined: Jun 28, 2017
   

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#826 » by CuseMayne » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:32 pm

amcoolio wrote:It's clear Mitch thinks this team is an East Finals contender as currently construed. Make no sense with the moves they made in free agency.



Literally mind boggling how stupid this is. Wasn't Mitch talking in a press conference pre draft how we were focused on developing our young players and something along the tune of, "It'll be hard for us to win games?" Also, "We won't be a big spender this offseason?"

Completely punting all of our flexibility and making the curse of Batum last 3 more years? For a brittle Gordon Hayward? So GH and a 19 year old LaMelo Ball are strong enough moves to warrant a shifting of our focus from "developing young guys" to "let's mortgage our future now so we can compete?"

Goooootcha.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 9,285
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#827 » by Braggins » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:56 pm

This franchise is a complete joke.

I would say Mitch should be fired, but it doesn't matter and there is no point. No one competent with vision is ever going to agree to be a GM for MJ and even if they did, MJ would still sabotage. This might be the low point since I started following in 2011.
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,499
And1: 6,461
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#828 » by SWedd523 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:10 am

Braggins wrote:This franchise is a complete joke.

I would say Mitch should be fired, but it doesn't matter and there is no point. No one competent with vision is ever going to agree to be an GM for MJ and even if they did, MJ would still sabotage. This might be the low point since I started following in 2011.

Odd that signing a guy I actually like as a basketball player in GH is the driving force behind many of us hitting LOLCat low morale levels.

Legit think MJ needs to cash in on his investment asap and take everyone in the front office except JB with him
Image
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 9,285
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#829 » by Braggins » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:13 am

SWedd523 wrote:
Braggins wrote:This franchise is a complete joke.

I would say Mitch should be fired, but it doesn't matter and there is no point. No one competent with vision is ever going to agree to be an GM for MJ and even if they did, MJ would still sabotage. This might be the low point since I started following in 2011.

Odd that signing a guy I actually like as a basketball player in GH is the driving force behind many of us hitting LOLCat low morale levels.

Legit think MJ needs to cash in on his investment asap and take everyone in the front office except JB with him

Yep, its weird. GH is a solidly positive player who plays the right way and they found a way to make signing him a potential disaster.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,529
And1: 14,251
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#830 » by HornetJail » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:14 am

SWedd523 wrote:
Braggins wrote:This franchise is a complete joke.

I would say Mitch should be fired, but it doesn't matter and there is no point. No one competent with vision is ever going to agree to be an GM for MJ and even if they did, MJ would still sabotage. This might be the low point since I started following in 2011.

Odd that signing a guy I actually like as a basketball player in GH is the driving force behind many of us hitting LOLCat low morale levels.

Legit think MJ needs to cash in on his investment asap and take everyone in the front office except JB with him

lol like we're allowed to have nice things
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,501
And1: 20,844
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#831 » by Diop » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:39 am

I had a gut feeling they were pretty set with the team we had. (apart from Batum)
So I'm not totally surprised with how this turned out. I guess the idea is to have a good year and to convice another star they could be the missing piece to a great team here.
Image
User avatar
316Hornets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,258
And1: 2,890
Joined: Jun 26, 2015
Location: Milky Way
 

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#832 » by 316Hornets » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:50 am

With the Batum stretch, I think we are in pretty good position to secure some nice draft picks in 2021 and 2022. Hayward will be a mentor to get us through this rebuild and we'll be making some noise when LaMelo is up for his 2nd contract. 2023 season should be the target date to have a playoff team. Still not happy about us backloading the Hayward deal though.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,234
And1: 6,251
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#833 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:58 am

Not to be the bearer of bad news, but looking at our available cap next offseason, we should have 30 million in cap space. However we have 15 million in cap holds with Graham and Monk so we will have about 15 million of free cap or so to try to pick up other free agents.

Stretching Batum, makes it a lot tougher to potentially sign a MAX guy (unlikely even before Batum.

What kind of contract does everyone think Monk will get?
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 9,285
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#834 » by Braggins » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:00 am

JMAC3 wrote:Not to be the bearer of bad news, but looking at our available cap next offseason, we should have 30 million in cap space. However we have 15 million in cap holds with Graham and Monk so we will have about 15 million of free cap or so to try to pick up other free agents.

Stretching Batum, makes it a lot tougher to potentially sign a MAX guy (unlikely even before Batum.

What kind of contract does everyone think Monk will get?

Its impossible to say at this point without seeing how he does this year, but I think if he plays well we are very likely losing him for nothing in the offseason.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,234
And1: 6,251
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#835 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:16 am

Braggins wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:Not to be the bearer of bad news, but looking at our available cap next offseason, we should have 30 million in cap space. However we have 15 million in cap holds with Graham and Monk so we will have about 15 million of free cap or so to try to pick up other free agents.

Stretching Batum, makes it a lot tougher to potentially sign a MAX guy (unlikely even before Batum.

What kind of contract does everyone think Monk will get?

Its impossible to say at this point without seeing how he does this year, but I think if he plays well we are very likely losing him for nothing in the offseason.


He is restricted free agent, so we won't lose him for nothing unless a team just offers him significantly more than we want to pay him. We can match any offer. We could pay Monk the MAX and Graham the MAX and still have 15 million in cap space and the Full MLE.

If we do not sign Monk back then we will have 28 million in cap space plus still be able to resign Graham to a MAX after we use that full amount of cap space.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#836 » by BigSlam » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:29 am

JMAC3 wrote:If we do not sign Monk back then we will have 28 million in cap space plus still be able to resign Graham to a MAX after we use that full amount of cap space.

If we sign Tae to a max contract next offseason then that will leave this offseason for dead in the “which was the worst off seasons” stakes.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,234
And1: 6,251
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#837 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:36 am

BigSlam wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:If we do not sign Monk back then we will have 28 million in cap space plus still be able to resign Graham to a MAX after we use that full amount of cap space.

If we sign Tae to a max contract next offseason then that will leave this offseason for dead in the “which was the worst off seasons” stakes.


Yeah I do not think we will actually do it, was just using it as an example to illustrate how the cap works for us next summer.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 9,285
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#838 » by Braggins » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:53 am

JMAC3 wrote:
Braggins wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:Not to be the bearer of bad news, but looking at our available cap next offseason, we should have 30 million in cap space. However we have 15 million in cap holds with Graham and Monk so we will have about 15 million of free cap or so to try to pick up other free agents.

Stretching Batum, makes it a lot tougher to potentially sign a MAX guy (unlikely even before Batum.

What kind of contract does everyone think Monk will get?

Its impossible to say at this point without seeing how he does this year, but I think if he plays well we are very likely losing him for nothing in the offseason.


He is restricted free agent, so we won't lose him for nothing unless a team just offers him significantly more than we want to pay him. We can match any offer. We could pay Monk the MAX and Graham the MAX and still have 15 million in cap space and the Full MLE.

If we do not sign Monk back then we will have 28 million in cap space plus still be able to resign Graham to a MAX after we use that full amount of cap space.

I know he is restricted, but if he plays well the cost of resigning he and Graham could end up being like 30+ million per season. Its obviously doable if they really want to, but would have the team rapidly running out of any future cap flexibility. Hayward + Rozier + Batum stretch + Graham/Monk new contracts would be around 90 million committed to four roster spots for non all-stars. I think there is decent chance that if someone signs Monk to a decent offer sheet they just have to let him go.

I'm really hoping they flip Rozier for an expiring and a pick by the deadline.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,198
And1: 45,798
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#839 » by JDR720 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:18 am

So, we basically traded a bunch of cap space and Nic for Hayward and 2 late 2nd round picks.

That's...not great. In fact, that is pretty bad.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,198
And1: 45,798
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: 2020 Off-season Discussion 

Post#840 » by JDR720 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:19 am

316Hornets wrote:With the Batum stretch, I think we are in pretty good position to secure some nice draft picks in 2021 and 2022. Hayward will be a mentor to get us through this rebuild and we'll be making some noise when LaMelo is up for his 2nd contract. 2023 season should be the target date to have a playoff team. Still not happy about us backloading the Hayward deal though.

That isn't what you sign 120 million dollar players for. We could've signed a few cheap vets like the Hawks did with Vince Carter the past couple seasons.

Return to Charlotte Hornets