mrknowitall215 wrote:Very disrespectful fan base towards Kemba
You have it the wrong way around.
Kemba disrespects this fanbase.
Moderators: JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever
mrknowitall215 wrote:Very disrespectful fan base towards Kemba
Sik Infant wrote:Braggins wrote:Batum and Lin combined for 3 assists in 63 minutes last night, but there hasn't been a word about that, and Kemba leads the team in every assist related statistic. The level of butthurt and hypocrisy is getting pathetic. You guys are just mad because Kemba had a good game and you can't reconcile that with your personal narratives about the team that you desperately want to be true. I know you guys desperately wanted Lin to be your savior to save you from the big bad Kemba, but hes barely cracking 40%/30% shooting numbers and making plays/assisting at an even lower rate than Kemba and you guys are having trouble handling it. Its ok though, maybe he will outplay Kemba tonight and you guys can all clamor about how he is obviously so much better and will lead us to the promised land if we stop letting Kemba hold him back.
This is BS.
Lin is our backup and on 2m per.
Batum is a SF.
Kemba had a good game and we lost.
I'm sure Kemba is really happy with himself.
Kemba is a borderline average starting PG, who can't run an offense, doesn't defend scores inefficiently.
Recipe for disaster.

Sik Infant wrote:mrknowitall215 wrote:Very disrespectful fan base towards Kemba
You have it the wrong way around.
Kemba disrespects this fanbase.


fatlever wrote:Sorry, "build around" is the wrong team. We don't have any players with building around. They signed Kemba to a long-term deal, though, so they have to at least try to put pieces together that make sense - same with MKG and Jefferson. You can't just ignore Kemba's flaws just because you don't think he's good enough to build around - stick your head in the sand and keep trying to force him to be something he is not - or worse create a toxic situation by benching him on the first year of a 48 mil deal. As long as the franchise has the goal of making the playoffs, then they have to maximize the players they have on the roster currently. As far as Kemba is concerned, that means having someone like Batum to help him.
I get what you are saying, you want him traded or benched, but we both know that's not going to happen this year. So either you fire Clifford and Cho and rebuild, or you put players together that make sense.
Last year nothing on the roster made sense. At least this year, you can see a little bit of a plan.
I'm no more of a Kemba fan than you are. We both know that.
Sik Infant wrote:He's average at best.
My hero MKG is an awesome player who has done more for this franchise than Kemba.
There is a reason why a guy like MKG is valued highly in this league and every bench in the NBA has a guy like Kemba.
Kemba provides zero skills needed in the modern NBA.
I think it's great that you guys come out of the woodwork after he has one good game.
yosemiteben wrote:I think people get way too worked up about Kemba personally, both postivitely and negatively. He's like #10 on my list of issues with this team as currently constructed, and he's about #8 on my list of exciting things about this team.
Mystical Apples wrote:I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable


Mystical Apples wrote:fatlever wrote:Sorry, "build around" is the wrong team. We don't have any players with building around. They signed Kemba to a long-term deal, though, so they have to at least try to put pieces together that make sense - same with MKG and Jefferson. You can't just ignore Kemba's flaws just because you don't think he's good enough to build around - stick your head in the sand and keep trying to force him to be something he is not - or worse create a toxic situation by benching him on the first year of a 48 mil deal. As long as the franchise has the goal of making the playoffs, then they have to maximize the players they have on the roster currently. As far as Kemba is concerned, that means having someone like Batum to help him.
I get what you are saying, you want him traded or benched, but we both know that's not going to happen this year. So either you fire Clifford and Cho and rebuild, or you put players together that make sense.
Last year nothing on the roster made sense. At least this year, you can see a little bit of a plan.
I'm no more of a Kemba fan than you are. We both know that.
I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable
yosemiteben wrote:"postivitely"![]()
I think my biggest concern last night is what do we do when Batum faces lock down defenders, because that's going to happen and we can't allow that to completely stall out our offense. From that perspective I can understand the concern about Kemba going into iso mode, but the concern is more because as we've seen the sort of efficiency he showed last night isn't something we can rely on. If it was, I would have no problem with him taking over the game in stretches when our other options have stalled out.

Mystical Apples wrote:fatlever wrote:Sorry, "build around" is the wrong team. We don't have any players with building around. They signed Kemba to a long-term deal, though, so they have to at least try to put pieces together that make sense - same with MKG and Jefferson. You can't just ignore Kemba's flaws just because you don't think he's good enough to build around - stick your head in the sand and keep trying to force him to be something he is not - or worse create a toxic situation by benching him on the first year of a 48 mil deal. As long as the franchise has the goal of making the playoffs, then they have to maximize the players they have on the roster currently. As far as Kemba is concerned, that means having someone like Batum to help him.
I get what you are saying, you want him traded or benched, but we both know that's not going to happen this year. So either you fire Clifford and Cho and rebuild, or you put players together that make sense.
Last year nothing on the roster made sense. At least this year, you can see a little bit of a plan.
I'm no more of a Kemba fan than you are. We both know that.
I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable, or there's an assumption it wouldn't be the best option for Kemba personally. Or for that matter why coming off the bench is a personal affront. Being under a lengthy contract or sulking are not legitimate reasons to prevent a franchise from doing what's best.
If they still view him as a long-term solution that's one thing (I don't think they do but that's besides the point). But the last thing they should do is make current and future decisions based upon a regrettable contract or 1 player's reaction to organizational decisions.
Marvin, Cody, Lin, Frank, PJ, and Lamb all seem to be fine with this idea. Batum has spent a career morphing into what is asked of him. Not sure why Al and Kemba are exempt.

Braggins wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:fatlever wrote:Sorry, "build around" is the wrong team. We don't have any players with building around. They signed Kemba to a long-term deal, though, so they have to at least try to put pieces together that make sense - same with MKG and Jefferson. You can't just ignore Kemba's flaws just because you don't think he's good enough to build around - stick your head in the sand and keep trying to force him to be something he is not - or worse create a toxic situation by benching him on the first year of a 48 mil deal. As long as the franchise has the goal of making the playoffs, then they have to maximize the players they have on the roster currently. As far as Kemba is concerned, that means having someone like Batum to help him.
I get what you are saying, you want him traded or benched, but we both know that's not going to happen this year. So either you fire Clifford and Cho and rebuild, or you put players together that make sense.
Last year nothing on the roster made sense. At least this year, you can see a little bit of a plan.
I'm no more of a Kemba fan than you are. We both know that.
I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable
It isn't, but no one else has proven that they should be the starter instead. You started from the assumption that Kemba should be benched because you are a Lin fan and obviously have an agenda. Why is the notion that he could be good enough as a starter or that he is currently our best option unfathomable to you?
Braggins wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:fatlever wrote:Sorry, "build around" is the wrong team. We don't have any players with building around. They signed Kemba to a long-term deal, though, so they have to at least try to put pieces together that make sense - same with MKG and Jefferson. You can't just ignore Kemba's flaws just because you don't think he's good enough to build around - stick your head in the sand and keep trying to force him to be something he is not - or worse create a toxic situation by benching him on the first year of a 48 mil deal. As long as the franchise has the goal of making the playoffs, then they have to maximize the players they have on the roster currently. As far as Kemba is concerned, that means having someone like Batum to help him.
I get what you are saying, you want him traded or benched, but we both know that's not going to happen this year. So either you fire Clifford and Cho and rebuild, or you put players together that make sense.
Last year nothing on the roster made sense. At least this year, you can see a little bit of a plan.
I'm no more of a Kemba fan than you are. We both know that.
I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable
It isn't, but no one else has proven that they should be the starter instead. You started from the assumption that Kemba should be benched because you are a Lin fan and obviously have an agenda. Why is the notion that he could be good enough as a starter or that he is currently our best option unfathomable to you?
JDR720 wrote:everyone. lets cut down on the unnecessary Kemba hate, its getting a bit ridiculous
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
fatlever wrote:Braggins wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:
I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable
It isn't, but no one else has proven that they should be the starter instead. You started from the assumption that Kemba should be benched because you are a Lin fan and obviously have an agenda. Why is the notion that he could be good enough as a starter or that he is currently our best option unfathomable to you?
BTW, Apples isn't a Lin fan, I believe he is a Frank fan. He signed up and was posting here before Lin signed. I don't think it is fair to label him as a biased Lin fan. That is not accurate.
Mystical Apples wrote:Braggins wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:
I don't get why Kemba to the bench is a notion that seems unfathomable
It isn't, but no one else has proven that they should be the starter instead. You started from the assumption that Kemba should be benched because you are a Lin fan and obviously have an agenda. Why is the notion that he could be good enough as a starter or that he is currently our best option unfathomable to you?
I think you misunderstood everything in my post. I was addressing the rationale of using a player's contract or potential reaction to an organizational decision as a legitimate reason to not make one. The other stuff is boring noise. For the record saying I'm a "Lin fan" is technically true just like I'm a "PJ fan" and "Cody fan" and "Hawes fan." I hope you understand the irony in citing an untrue fan bias while simultaneously going out of your way to regularly defend another.
What's of interest to me is why fans think the "best player" should start and why that should matter. Or why tired discussions about a team sport devolves into player x > player y (which is often miscalculated based upon scoring). What matters is lineup fit and player combinations in the context of modern offensive principals
Case in point: whether or not PJ is better than Cody is immaterial. Those were my points.