A future without MJ?
Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
A future without MJ?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,237
- And1: 167
- Joined: May 24, 2008
A future without MJ?
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baske ... bled=false
Good read. Gives you an idea that he has entrusted Cho to turn this around quickly or MJ might get out. Not so sure a new Owner who is loaded and will spend out the butt would be a bad thing. But I would fear that unless he has ties to the Carolinas, the team could eventually find its way out. Hopefully Cho gets the job done.
And if the Basketball Gods want to help, Davis this 2012 Draft and Muhammad in 2013 Draft would be a bit of welcomed news!
Good read. Gives you an idea that he has entrusted Cho to turn this around quickly or MJ might get out. Not so sure a new Owner who is loaded and will spend out the butt would be a bad thing. But I would fear that unless he has ties to the Carolinas, the team could eventually find its way out. Hopefully Cho gets the job done.
And if the Basketball Gods want to help, Davis this 2012 Draft and Muhammad in 2013 Draft would be a bit of welcomed news!
Re: A future without MJ?
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,726
- And1: 16,720
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: A future without MJ?
I cant really blame Jordan. Hes poor compared to other billionaire owners, and losing $20 million a year has to be botheting him. If he does sell i hope its in writing that the team cant move. Still 4 years away though
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: A future without MJ?
- Eoghan
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,315
- And1: 3,293
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: A future without MJ?
He wants to turn a profit?
Step 1: Fire Higgins.
Step 1: Fire Higgins.
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 279
- And1: 69
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Re: A future without MJ?
Ny Daily News is a total rag.
It's obvious that he didn't recently tell Cho to rebuild, that decision happened at the trade deadline last season when Crash was traded and driven home even more on Draft night when Jack was traded so we could move up in the draft.
The last paragraph is just stupid... Why would any Bobcat fan want us to suck for 3 or 4 more seasons so that MJ would sell the team? Wouldn't all of us prefer that he became the GOAT as an owner and we win a championship in the next 3 or 4 seasons?
It's obvious that he didn't recently tell Cho to rebuild, that decision happened at the trade deadline last season when Crash was traded and driven home even more on Draft night when Jack was traded so we could move up in the draft.
The last paragraph is just stupid... Why would any Bobcat fan want us to suck for 3 or 4 more seasons so that MJ would sell the team? Wouldn't all of us prefer that he became the GOAT as an owner and we win a championship in the next 3 or 4 seasons?
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 279
- And1: 69
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Re: A future without MJ?
And another thing.... Why would he sell, right when a new national tv contract will increase revenue and the stiffer lux tax penalties will increase the revenue sharing.
This article is dumb on so many levels.
This article is dumb on so many levels.
Re: A future without MJ?
- HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,423
- And1: 14,170
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
-
Re: A future without MJ?
Getting rid of every Higgins would be the place to start.
investigate Adam Silver
Re: A future without MJ?
- Eoghan
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,315
- And1: 3,293
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: A future without MJ?
*David Stern reads the paper*
*slams it down on the table*
Curses! Now I'll have to rig the lottery for MJ. New Orleans isn't going to like it. Meh, I'll make Silverman deal with it.
*slams it down on the table*
Curses! Now I'll have to rig the lottery for MJ. New Orleans isn't going to like it. Meh, I'll make Silverman deal with it.
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,030
- And1: 1
- Joined: Sep 26, 2010
- Location: Evansville, Indiana
Re: A future without MJ?
BrotherDave wrote:*David Stern reads the paper*
*slams it down on the table*
Curses! Now I'll have to rig the lottery for MJ. New Orleans isn't going to like it. Meh, I'll make Silverman deal with it.

Re: A future without MJ?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,899
- And1: 2,592
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
Re: A future without MJ?
Not going to happen.
A future without MJ?
- countryboi
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,312
- And1: 1,459
- Joined: Jul 30, 2008
-
A future without MJ?
this is crap....jordan has been trying to tear it down and rebuild since the day he cut dampier...and this whole turn a profit idea just not going to happen the best he can hope for is to break even....no one buys a NBA team with the idea of turning a profit its pretty much a rich mans toy
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 372
- And1: 32
- Joined: Jan 25, 2012
Re: A future without MJ?
Meh, I think the value of most franchises increases year to year regardless of not turning a "profit". I also think it is in this aspect that most small market teams are attractive and why people continue to buy them. The idea that having a net profit at the end of the year is the be all and end all seems kind of stupid for a small market owner.
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,491
- And1: 61
- Joined: May 21, 2004
Re: A future without MJ?
LOL at anybody who believes this story. The guy has been hating on mj for a while now.
The curse of Higgins!
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,030
- And1: 1
- Joined: Sep 26, 2010
- Location: Evansville, Indiana
Re: A future without MJ?
countryboi wrote:this is crap....jordan has been trying to tear it down and rebuild since the day he cut dampier...and this whole turn a profit idea just not going to happen the best he can hope for is to break even....no one buys a NBA team with the idea of turning a profit its pretty much a rich mans toy
lollockout
Re: A future without MJ?
- countryboi
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,312
- And1: 1,459
- Joined: Jul 30, 2008
-
Re: A future without MJ?
captaincrunk wrote:countryboi wrote:this is crap....jordan has been trying to tear it down and rebuild since the day he cut dampier...and this whole turn a profit idea just not going to happen the best he can hope for is to break even....no one buys a NBA team with the idea of turning a profit its pretty much a rich mans toy
lollockout
and even with the lockout most teams are still not turning a profit...hell they are not even breaking even
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,030
- And1: 1
- Joined: Sep 26, 2010
- Location: Evansville, Indiana
Re: A future without MJ?
countryboi wrote:captaincrunk wrote:countryboi wrote:this is crap....jordan has been trying to tear it down and rebuild since the day he cut dampier...and this whole turn a profit idea just not going to happen the best he can hope for is to break even....no one buys a NBA team with the idea of turning a profit its pretty much a rich mans toy
lollockout
and even with the lockout most teams are still not turning a profit...hell they are not even breaking even
Doesn't mean they don't want to be. They were willing to put their "toy" on the shelf for an entire year over the money. Don't think it means nothing at all to them.
Re: A future without MJ?
- Fred Williamson
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,849
- And1: 519
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
- Location: Yurop
-
Re: A future without MJ?
bobcats haters on the GB are going to have a field day with this
Re: A future without MJ?
- Fred Williamson
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,849
- And1: 519
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
- Location: Yurop
-
Re: A future without MJ?
Fred Williamson wrote:bobcats haters on the GB are going to have a field day with this
oh, there's already a 7+ pages thread about it
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,494
- And1: 130
- Joined: Aug 25, 2010
Re: A future without MJ?
Bobcats don't really need MJ. He's done nothing to show he is a particularly valuable owner. No players are deciding to come here because of him. He hasn't shown any shrewdness except perhaps in getting Cho. It doesn't take much skill to strip down a team as has been done. Throwing Chandler away for nothing didn't take much skill. I read this story about him wanting to sell if the team doesn't turn around and I don't see why I care much.
Re: A future without MJ?
- Fred Williamson
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,849
- And1: 519
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
- Location: Yurop
-
Re: A future without MJ?
Nanogeek wrote:Bobcats don't really need MJ. He's done nothing to show he is a particularly valuable owner. No players are deciding to come here because of him. He hasn't shown any shrewdness except perhaps in getting Cho. It doesn't take much skill to strip down a team as has been done. Throwing Chandler away for nothing didn't take much skill. I read this story about him wanting to sell if the team doesn't turn around and I don't see why I care much.
he has done "nothing"? are you serious? Look at the attendance in the arena, the advertisment deals, etc. Apart from that, this is what? his second year as an owner? Do you people expect him to build a championchip contender within 2 years? Come on man, you can't be that stupid.
And how can you throw away something that had nothing of value to begin with. Chandler didn't want to play here, pretended to be "injured", and was outplayed by Theo Ratliff and Nazr Mohammed.
Re: A future without MJ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,494
- And1: 130
- Joined: Aug 25, 2010
Re: A future without MJ?
Fred Williamson wrote:Nanogeek wrote:Bobcats don't really need MJ. He's done nothing to show he is a particularly valuable owner. No players are deciding to come here because of him. He hasn't shown any shrewdness except perhaps in getting Cho. It doesn't take much skill to strip down a team as has been done. Throwing Chandler away for nothing didn't take much skill. I read this story about him wanting to sell if the team doesn't turn around and I don't see why I care much.
he has done "nothing"? are you serious?
I didn't say he has done nothing. I said "he's done nothing to show he is a particularly valuable owner."
Look at the attendance in the arena, the advertisment deals, etc.
Advertising? Do you think advertising was some sort of stroke of genius? "Hey guys, because I'm a marketing genius I've decided we should advertise to increase customers!" Like I said, "he's done nothing to show he is a particularly valuable owner." The fact the first thing you come up with is marketing 101 just supports my point.
Apart from that, this is what? his second year as an owner? Do you people expect him to build a championchip contender within 2 years? Come on man, you can't be that stupid.
Its ironic you are talking about stupidity when you can't seem to parse English properly. What he has done so far could have been done by any owner. Anyone can give away players. Anyone can trade talent away for crap. I'll repeat it again since the statement seem to befuddle you the first time.... "He's done nothing to show he is a particularly valuable owner."
And how can you throw away something that had nothing of value to begin with. Chandler didn't want to play here, pretended to be "injured", and was outplayed by Theo Ratliff and Nazr Mohammed.
Fine. But a shrewd manager would have realized he would be of value to a contender and extracted something of value from them. Instead he extracted nothing from Dallas and actually extracted negative value in my opinion since if we had kept Chandler on the books we'd be rid of his salary by now. Because of MJ's "genius" we've still got Matt Carroll on the books through 2013 and Najera through this year.
Read what I post and then respond to that - it works better that way.