SWedd523 wrote:What I've noticed is that it seems to be guys with lower post counts (<1000 or so) that have the most vitriol towards the team. Maybe that's just confirmation bias, but it does seem that way.
Something else that might contribute towards the hate is the MJ connection. Jordan has always been either really hot or really cold with fans so perhaps the haters have transferred that hate to the team?
Yeah that's what I meant really, combined with what I said about analysts. MJ definitely isn't a neutral guy in the NBA.
SWedd523 wrote:Another thing may be the "new kid syndrome". We don't have a history and haven't had much of a chance to build any sort of powerhouse team so guys are like "**** 'em".
One would think the Bobcats would be one of the lovable loser teams. For the majority of our short existence (at least up until this year) we've been a team of high effort and tough players who "play the right way". Most people applaud effort...... yet the Bobcats still get a ton of hate.
There might be something to this. We've won a LOT of games that teams of our caliber had no business winning. We've beaten the Celtics and the Lakers and so on in years where we couldn't even make the playoffs. So we've had some annoying wins in the past.
SWedd523 wrote:One this is for certain though, the Bobcats get an inordinately high level of hate in comparison to other teams*
*in similar situations. The Heat are definitely hated, but it's a personality thing. People hate the Lakers and the Celtics and such, but it's because they've lost to them, or hate Kobe because of the court case.
Stun704 wrote:I guess you don't know what a "hater" is, a a hater is someone who irrationally and excessively hates on something without any good or an overblown reason why. An example of a hater is a racist
I guess you don't know what words are, because I already used a whole bunch showing you that this was just crap. It's just a buzzword that people use to avoid accountability. Everyone is called a hater these days. You think LeBron needs to work on his post game? you're just a hater!
People use the word, and by your definition it should be a pretty serious accusation. You're essentially saying someone is being intellectually dishonest.
Stun704 wrote:Iquote="captaincrunk"]I guess the important point is that our name has nothing to do with it. If someone complains about the name, I'm willing to bet they complained about that right after complaining about something else. If it's complained about, it's just more wood for the fire rather than having any causal relationship in the process. But yeah the lack of success definitely plays a role. I bet if we had won a playoff game or two it would have been a little better, maybe.
Also, and I'm not trying to be inflammatory by saying this, but a lot of the analysts are competing with MJs legacy. So when MJ does something bad, it's good for them, maybe? Maybe not, it could be a reach.
I thought the premise of this thread was why does a good amount of GB posters give negative criticism to the bobcats. if we're talking about outside of this site, I still think it boils down to the name. because a teams name is the first thing someone can look at and judge a franchise by, without actually knowing its history. Sorry but that's the truth, if we were still the Hornets, or had a more respectable name we wouldn't be hated on as much.[/quote]
Yeah I know you said that, but you're wrong. Saying it again doesn't help.
Not to mention that the thread was made in response to my post. I think I have some leeway in how I respond to it, in regards to the scope of my posts.