LamarMatic7 wrote:jdm3 wrote:LamarMatic7 wrote:I do understand that there's an age difference between the two of them and it would be easier for any of the 450 players to play in Golden State, I honestly do. But I think that some people on here do underestimate Draymond Green.
He's a capable three point shooter;
He's an excellent passer, not only benefiting from playing for the Dubs but making assists in tight areas, catching the ball on the move in the pick-n-roll and passing it further in one motion;
He can legitimately play center in some situations, creating a nightmare 5-man unit for opposing teams. It's no sparse happening either. Golden State's sixth most used line-up features Draymond as the center.
Those three aspects of the game are something that MKG isn't even close to being able to do.
The thing is I am not sure you won't be able to see MKG do everything defensively that Green can do now in 2 years. They were about the same size at the combine. Standing reach and everything was so very close. If MKG adds some muscle as he gets older he could easily do anything that Green can do currently since he is a better athlete and just as long. MKG does not shoot as well but has much better handles already. Despite the age difference they are not very far off right now.
Yeah, sure. That's why I didn't really mention defense, apart from Green playing center which is something I'm not even sure that I'd want MKG to attempt to do.
ugh... as far as Mike's handles go... I think they're rather mediocre, but it seems like some like them more than I do.
I am not saying MKG can run point but he has a 10x better chance of going coast to coast vs a solo defender than Green. Green is not even a very good driver unless he has a much slower matchup. I would not want MKG to guard small centers but I do think in a couple years with some added muscle with age he could be as effective at it as Green. I think in both cases it is mostly for mismatches on the offensive end and not that they would be great defenders there.