catch20two wrote:
Good news. I'd still like to see him come off the bench and let Lamb start.
Moderators: JDR720, Diop, fatlever, yosemiteben, BigSlam
catch20two wrote:
catch20two wrote:I doubt Batum would be happy about coming off the bench.
bravor wrote:catch20two wrote:I doubt Batum would be happy about coming off the bench.
That's what happened when Wallace had been traded to the Blazers a few years ago. He did not pout if that what's you imply. He takes what his team/coach gives him.
bravor wrote: I still highly doubt it would benefit to the team. Lamb did stats in a losing team. I d rather poor stats - everything being relative - from wing players in a winning effort.
Yet, not a surprised to read a few jump on the opportunity as soon as Batum has an off game.
catch20two wrote:I doubt Batum would be happy about coming off the bench.
Bassman wrote:catch20two wrote:
Good news. I'd still like to see him come off the bench and let Lamb start.
Joest2003 wrote:Why can't cliff just find a way to play Batum and Lamb together? Kemba Lamb and Batum could be a dangerous trio.
Probably because we already know our current starting lineup works and our bench unit needs reliable scoring.Joest2003 wrote:Why can't cliff just find a way to play Batum and Lamb together? Kemba Lamb and Batum could be a dangerous trio.
yosemiteben wrote:Probably because we already know our current starting lineup works and our bench unit needs reliable scoring.