_tijo_ wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:After reading the comments about locker room dysfunction, specifically Kemba hating Dwight and the players siding with Kemba and Dwight not setting screens on critical plays, it seemed like Dwight simply had to go asap if we wanted to have any success next year.
I'm leaning more towards the idea we will not blow it up tonight and trade Kemba. It seems at this point we're at least going to try to give Borrego a chance to turn it around and shedding Dwight was a big part of that. If we were going full rebuild Dwight's presence would not be as big a deal (maybe even valuable as a tank commander) and at minimum it would have been smarter to see what teams might be willing to pay in January for his 'services' as a soon-to-be-expiring. The timing of this move suggests we're leaning toward being competitive, assuming we're executing a logical plan (not a given). Tonight will be very enlightening.
I think it will be fascinating. If they really thought Dwight was the problem, I think this is a move as much for Batum as it was for Kemba. I think Mitch looked at it, found that he couldn't unload Batum's deal, so he looked at the factors that made him ineffective this year vs. previous years. And his conclusion was that he tried too much to adjust to Dwight instead of playing the game that made him effective alongside Kemba in the past. He's betting that getting rid of Dwight, and giving Borrego the player development will entice Kemba to stay to build with a on-the-rise group.
I think your both right on the $