Page 1 of 2

Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Mon Nov 5, 2018 7:47 pm
by JDR720
Q. Is the Hornets’ bench actually good?

A. It is good. The early statistics demonstrate that: The Hornets reserves are outscoring their collective counterparts by approximately three points per game. That’s not great shakes, but it certainly would raise the grade from a D-minus much of last season to a B now.

The additions of Tony Parker and Miles Bridges obviously help, as does Malik Monk looking more ready for consequential minutes and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist embracing this role with the second unit.
-----------------

Q. Is Frank Kaminsky likely to be traded now that he is basically a DNP (Did Not Play) every game? Or do the Hornets keep him around knowing Cody Zeller has a tendency to miss at least some chunks of games throughout a season?

A. Kaminsky isn’t playing meaningful minutes and it wouldn’t surprise me, if that doesn’t change, if the Hornets choose not to make him a $5 million qualifying offer to restrict his free-agency next summer.

However, I’d be reluctant to trade him for just anything. Center depth isn’t easy to replace once it’s gone, and I could imagine a Murphy’s Law scenario where another center gets hurt as soon as you cast off Kaminsky.

--------------------

Q. Would the Hornets use their 2019 first-round pick in a trade that would move Bismack Biyombo’s contract and create cap space for Kemba?

A. Those are actually two separate questions. The Hornets being over the salary cap or even the luxury tax wouldn’t preclude them from re-signing Walker, since they hold his Larry Bird Rights under NBA rules. (There are other consequences to being over the tax, and owner Michael Jordan would be reluctant to cross that threshold).

Separately, if another team wanted the Hornets’ first-round pick enough to be willing to absorb Biyombo’s $17 million salary for the 2019-20 season, I’m sure general manager Mitch Kupchak would listen. But I doubt it would be that simple; at minimum the Hornets would logically have to take back some other unattractive contract in such a deal.

---
https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nba/charlotte-hornets/article220932550.html


A couple more in the article.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Wed Nov 7, 2018 7:10 pm
by fatlever
finally, an answer on this Q

A. Kaminsky isn’t playing meaningful minutes and it wouldn’t surprise me, if that doesn’t change, if the Hornets choose not to make him a $5 million qualifying offer to restrict his free-agency next summer.


He gone!!! what a waste of a pick.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Wed Nov 7, 2018 8:15 pm
by 316Hornets
fatlever wrote:finally, an answer on this Q

A. Kaminsky isn’t playing meaningful minutes and it wouldn’t surprise me, if that doesn’t change, if the Hornets choose not to make him a $5 million qualifying offer to restrict his free-agency next summer.


He gone!!! what a waste of a pick.



Won't be the 1st or last. At least the last couple picks are showing great potential. Frank was more a marketing draw than anything, but he didn't care enough.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Wed Nov 7, 2018 8:25 pm
by yosemiteben
That 2015 draft class sucked.

Underperformers: Okafor, Russell (does he count as underperforming?), Hezonja, Mudiay, Johnson

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Wed Nov 7, 2018 8:48 pm
by BigSlam
yosemiteben wrote:That 2015 draft class sucked.

Underperformers: Okafor, Russell (does he count as underperforming?), Hezonja, Mudiay, Johnson

Performed as expected: Karl-Anthony Towns, Willie Cauley-Stein

Over-performed: Kristaps Porzingis, Myles Turner, Devin Booker

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Nov 8, 2018 2:21 am
by Eoghan
316Hornets wrote:
fatlever wrote:finally, an answer on this Q

A. Kaminsky isn’t playing meaningful minutes and it wouldn’t surprise me, if that doesn’t change, if the Hornets choose not to make him a $5 million qualifying offer to restrict his free-agency next summer.


He gone!!! what a waste of a pick.



Won't be the 1st or last. At least the last couple picks are showing great potential. Frank was more a marketing draw than anything, but he didn't care enough.

Huh? Charlotte was trying to corner that coveted Wisconsin demographic? Wouldn't drafting Winslow had been more of a marketing draw?

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Nov 8, 2018 2:44 am
by Diop
Who would win in 1 on 1, BJ Mullens or Frank?

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Nov 8, 2018 3:01 am
by fatlever
mullens

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Nov 8, 2018 3:56 pm
by 316Hornets
Eoghan wrote:
316Hornets wrote:
fatlever wrote:finally, an answer on this Q



He gone!!! what a waste of a pick.



Won't be the 1st or last. At least the last couple picks are showing great potential. Frank was more a marketing draw than anything, but he didn't care enough.

Huh? Charlotte was trying to corner that coveted Wisconsin demographic? Wouldn't drafting Winslow had been more of a marketing draw?


Frank was a media darling after carrying Wisconsin, probably the reason MJ liked him so much. We've all seen all the pictures of him on yachts and stuff, he has a magnetic personality. The problem is, he wasn't putting the effort in behind the scenes to walk the walk.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Fri Nov 9, 2018 1:05 am
by Eoghan
316Hornets wrote:
Eoghan wrote:
316Hornets wrote:

Won't be the 1st or last. At least the last couple picks are showing great potential. Frank was more a marketing draw than anything, but he didn't care enough.

Huh? Charlotte was trying to corner that coveted Wisconsin demographic? Wouldn't drafting Winslow had been more of a marketing draw?


Frank was a media darling after carrying Wisconsin, probably the reason MJ liked him so much. We've all seen all the pictures of him on yachts and stuff, he has a magnetic personality. The problem is, he wasn't putting the effort in behind the scenes to walk the walk.

The media gets press passes to games, they don't buy many tickets. The reason MJ liked him was b/c Frank grew up in a Chicago suburb and MJ was his favorite player. None of these are particularly good reasons for drafting him though.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Fri Nov 9, 2018 1:42 am
by Diop
Phil Jackson said he liked Frank too, I think due to his final college where he won a ton of awards. That's the crap shoot of drafting.

I remember there was a consensus after the first 3 years that Hendo was at least as good as Derozan. demar just continued developing

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:29 am
by W_HAMILTON
I will never forget Kaminsky saying, “I know the NBA has their crazy fans and all, but if you look at all of their games, there are games when teams like the Bobcats get hardly any fans, and it looks flat out boring."

**** him.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 5:00 am
by Eoghan
Yeah, I can't believe we drafted him after that.

"So, how do you feel about working for Corporation?"

Job candidate Frank: "It's ****."

"Welcome to Corporation!"

- our previous front office.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 5:30 am
by MasterIchiro
My question:

Does Miles Bridges deserve a promotion?

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:58 pm
by fatlever
MasterIchiro wrote:My question:

Does Miles Bridges deserve a promotion?
No, not yet. He still needs to figure out some things on defense. While he makes some spectacular recovery blocks, he's still getting lost too often and team defense. That typically doesn't happen with Marvin.

Sent from my SM-G920V using RealGM mobile app

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:24 pm
by JDR720
Read on Twitter

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Dec 6, 2018 8:07 pm
by JDR720
Read on Twitter

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Dec 6, 2018 8:50 pm
by Liver_Pooty
JDR720 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Anyway you can post the article? Ive ran out of "free access" on the Observer. Probably stuff we already know anyway

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Dec 6, 2018 8:58 pm
by JDR720
Q. Why is Nic Batum starting?

A. The short answer: Because warts and all, he’s still a better option for now at small forward than Dwayne Bacon or rookie Miles Bridges.

The long answer: Is Batum performing like you’d expect from a player making $24 million this season? No, and that’s a problem. But as then-Hornets coach Steve Clifford said after Batum signed that contract, the salary wasn’t going to transform Batum into a 25-points-a-game scorer. That stuff was all fan expectations, not reality.

The Hornets offered him that contract because they felt competitive pressure to retain talent after Batum had a career season, his first after the trade from the Portland Trail Blazers. The Hornets weren’t the only team prepared to pay him that way.
This season, in order to get scorer Jeremy Lamb into the starting lineup, new coach James Borrego is asking more of Batum defensively. The opposing team’s better wing scorer is now Batum’s responsibility, rather than Michael Kidd-Gilchrist’s.

If you replace Batum in the starting lineup with Bacon or Bridges, it will be a rocky ride. As Borrego said post-game Sunday, he needs to search for ways to get Batum more involved offensively than he’s been. Batum is best as a passer and decision-maker, and that doesn’t happen as much as it once did (how much of that is Batum’s doing or Borrego’s, you could debate all day.)

Q. What do you think the odds are of the Hornets trading for Bradley Beal or someone else before the trade deadline who could help make a push for a higher seed in the playoffs?

A. It was always a long shot that the Washington Wizards would give up Beal, particularly during this season. Of the three highly-paid Wizards - Beal, John Wall and Otto Porter - Beal looks like the most cost-effective relative to his contract, and therefore the player they’d be least receptive to trading.

It was right for the Hornets to inquire about Beal’s availability because Kemba Walker needs help, but the Wizards don’t seem ready to blow up their core.

I think Hornets general manager Mitch Kupchak will be proactive in looking to improve the roster; that is certainly the agenda owner Michael Jordan has set for years. However, as I’ve written several times of late, this team has limited trade assets. Acquiring a starter-quality player would entail giving up multiple young players and/or first-round picks. It’s a “is the juice worth the squeeze?’ judgment whether a trade happens before the February deadline.

Q. Why don’t Malik Monk and the other younger guys play more?

A. Borrego was very direct Sunday after Monk played just 10 minutes against the Pelicans: Monk has to play more consistent defense to play more regular minutes. Nothing new there; it’s the same concern Clifford had last season, which limited Monk’s minutes his rookie season.

Q. When are the Hornets going to start playing defense?

A. They haven’t been awful defensively, but they also haven’t been good. They are 15th among 30 NBA teams in defensive efficiency (measured as points allowed per 100 possessions).

They have been much better in offensive efficiency (sixth). That dynamic is partially talent and partially a function of coaching philosophy. When Borrego chose to replace Kidd-Gilchrist in the starting lineup with Lamb, it was an effort to add offense at the potential expense of defense.

Also, the Hornets are playing defense differently this season than they did under Clifford, specifically how much they now switch. In the long run, that’s a good thing to install, but there was always going to be a challenging transition. As Marvin Williams noted in the preseason, all that switching puts a premium on more defensive communication and trust between teammates, and that isn’t instant.

Q. What is the post-Tony Parker plan (at backup point guard)? Regardless of time frame, is the idea to groom a young guy or bring in veteran talent when their salary cap situation improves?

A What we know is rookie Devonte Graham is earning Borrego’s trust, as reflected in the 18 minutes he played Sunday.

This franchise has had no real success in the second round of the draft since the NBA returned to Charlotte in 2004. Graham is mature and skilled at point guard. Trading up with the Atlanta Hawks to early in the second round to acquire Graham looks like a good call, based on the evidence so far.

Q. Do you see any situation where the Hornets are able to keep both Kemba Walker and Jeremy Lamb beyond this season?

A. There is nothing in the rules that would restrict them from re-signing Walker and Lamb. The question, as I wrote in a column recently, is whether Lamb sustains a level of play so good that he prices himself out of what the Hornets can sensibly afford to pay.

Salary caps are intended to make teams make hard choices. If you have Monk, Bridges and Bacon under relatively cheap contracts, and if the terms of Batum’s contract guarantee him more than $25 million next season, then can you justify paying Lamb $14 million or more next season to fill a wing position?

You could probably only justify that if other moves are made that thin out the wing positions.

Q. If the Hornets need to set their sights on the seventh or eighth seed (in the Eastern Conference playoffs), who do you see as the bigger threat to get into that mix, the Miami Heat or Washington Wizards?

A. Very close call there, as reflected by the standings. So close that it wouldn’t surprise me if injuries decide those last two playoff spots.

But if I had to pick between the Wizards and Heat, I’d say Miami. The Wizards might have more collective talent, but they have long-chronicled chemistry problems. Also, Miami coach Erik Spoelstra is terrific at maximizing whatever talent he has.

Re: Bonnell Q&A

Posted: Thu Dec 6, 2018 10:17 pm
by DY_nasty
why in the world is jeremy lamb in our long term plans at this point lmao