Moderators: JDR720, Diop, fatlever, yosemiteben, BigSlam
amcoolio wrote:I think we make massive roster changes. I think just about everybody including MJ is sick of this ****.
Shoutout to Cody Zeller who couldn't play a single game in the last 4 weeks because he was sore.
I want Cody, Batum, Biz, Marvin, and MKG off the team. Cut them and take the dead money as losses, I don't care.
amcoolio wrote:I want Cody, Batum, Biz, Marvin, and MKG off the team. Cut them and take the dead money as losses, I don't care.
HornetsFan29 wrote:amcoolio wrote:I think we make massive roster changes. I think just about everybody including MJ is sick of this ****.
Shoutout to Cody Zeller who couldn't play a single game in the last 4 weeks because he was sore.
I want Cody, Batum, Biz, Marvin, and MKG off the team. Cut them and take the dead money as losses, I don't care.
do you think frank will be resigned after how well he played in the end and how much will it cost us if we are intrested in keeping him.
amcoolio wrote:HornetsFan29 wrote:amcoolio wrote:I think we make massive roster changes. I think just about everybody including MJ is sick of this ****.
Shoutout to Cody Zeller who couldn't play a single game in the last 4 weeks because he was sore.
I want Cody, Batum, Biz, Marvin, and MKG off the team. Cut them and take the dead money as losses, I don't care.
do you think frank will be resigned after how well he played in the end and how much will it cost us if we are intrested in keeping him.
Frank isn't worth more than 5 million a year. Let him go somewhere else if he gets more money. We needed him tonight and he couldn't do it. The consistency just isnt there.
I also think this is Lamb's best season and he won't be good when he gets paid.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
Rich4114 wrote:Splitta wrote:Have to give Orlando credit as they played hard and to be honest, they have much more talent then the Hornets and it shows. Our young guys have some talent but need more experience. Other than Kemba and Lamb, we do not have any decent veteran talent. Mitch has a tough job ahead of him unless he can move some of the bad contracts. Hopefully we will not have to give up any first round draft picks.
Defensively, I think Marvin would’ve made a difference on Gordon tonight.
BlackOutBuzz wrote:Late games have some relevance, although not the one being broadcast nationally (Jazz/Clips).
Kings vs. Blazers: obviously a Sacramento win slightly improves our lottery odds. But also because the Denver 2nd round pick we're owed could be affected by a Portland win. It's worth noting that Portland appears to be starting 3rd stringers, presumably to ensure a 4/5 matchup with Utah instead of a 3/6 with OKC.
Nuggets vs. Wolves: Nuggets render any of the above null with a win tonight, and they do appear to be going for it with their starters vs. a KAT-less Minnesota team. But a loss, coupled with a Portland win would create a 3-way tie with the idle Rockets.
This scenario would mean picks 55-57 would be decided by random draw. If Denver ends up at 55, we'd get that pick; if they get 56 or 57 we'd get Washington's 36th pick.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
Simplest is just a Denver win, but if they lose we also want Portland to lose. Otherwise we leave it to chance whether we get pick 36 or pick 55.W_HAMILTON wrote:BlackOutBuzz wrote:Late games have some relevance, although not the one being broadcast nationally (Jazz/Clips).
Kings vs. Blazers: obviously a Sacramento win slightly improves our lottery odds. But also because the Denver 2nd round pick we're owed could be affected by a Portland win. It's worth noting that Portland appears to be starting 3rd stringers, presumably to ensure a 4/5 matchup with Utah instead of a 3/6 with OKC.
Nuggets vs. Wolves: Nuggets render any of the above null with a win tonight, and they do appear to be going for it with their starters vs. a KAT-less Minnesota team. But a loss, coupled with a Portland win would create a 3-way tie with the idle Rockets.
This scenario would mean picks 55-57 would be decided by random draw. If Denver ends up at 55, we'd get that pick; if they get 56 or 57 we'd get Washington's 36th pick.
I'm not following -- so what exact results do we need to get the 36th pick?
BlackOutBuzz wrote:Simplest is just a Denver win, but if they lose we also want Portland to lose. Otherwise we leave it to chance whether we get pick 36 or pick 55.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
Yeah that seems to have been what they were angling for, but now Portland has decided not to oblige and seems intent on holding at the 4-seed.W_HAMILTON wrote:BlackOutBuzz wrote:Simplest is just a Denver win, but if they lose we also want Portland to lose. Otherwise we leave it to chance whether we get pick 36 or pick 55.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Ahh, okay. I think that DEN will try their best to win, judging from some elaborate tank scheme of theirs I was reading about on the General Board earlier. They basically have allegedly been trying to semi-tank so that they end up #2 and I guess Portland ends up #3, which would mean GSW/HOU end up in the other bracket.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
