ImageImage

Not Revisionist History: Post LaMelo Ball thoughts

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,536
And1: 9,904
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Not Revisionist History: Post LaMelo Ball thoughts 

Post#1 » by amcoolio » Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:24 pm

This is a thread for us to go on the record about:

our draft picks and who we wanted at each pick
free agency signings and if they were great/bad
trades and if they were great/bad

Should have done this earlier, but no way am I going through hundreds of posts about previous drafts.

So post here to go on the record about our drafts, signings and trades and I will update this first post with results.

2020 NBA Draft:

[3] LaMelo Ball and [32] Vernon Carey Jr.

Spoiler:
KEMBAtheMETEOR (formally BizGilWalker): Post draft thought: I wish I had booze

amcoolio: LaMelo-
Hated the kid at first, but quickly warmed up to him over the last few weeks before the draft due to good reports and work ethic. I like him the most out of the top 3 of Wiseman/Edwards/Ball. I am weary of Edwards work ethic and his red flags with not liking basketball, but he will be a good player. I think Wiseman will be another Hassan Whiteside, and you can get those types of players easier. LaMelo has the most star potential and can unlock our offense.

Bigslam: 2020 pick #3 = LaMelo Ball
He was 4th on my personal big board, and even then I wasn't super feeling him.
I think we have drafted him with the hope of him somehow developing a reliable jump shot and that he will stop taking bad shots, things he's said he doesn't want to change. We are also banking on him also improving his defense enough that doesn't make him a liability like he currently is. My worry is that his ability to improve in these areas exceeds how much he will be able to in order to morph into that super star status the "Ball-ievers" think he can/will reach.
I think there will be highlight plays but I think there will be many, many more frustrating plays.
I'll fully support him now he is ours, but I am not optimistic.
I will add that I am very happy that we didn't use any assets to trade up and instead stood pat and took Ball #3 without having to give anything up.
P.S. I am trade marking "Ball-ievers".

DY_nasty: i'm not excited obviously, but hoping for the best nonetheless

countryboi: We didnt do anything dumb to get Ball, He has some NBA elite level skills like his court vision, passing and dribbling. his shot selection is one of some who thinks they are a dead eye shooter and his defense is just trash. if he can get his shot to match his confidence and just give a damn on defense, he could be a major problem. these are some major IFs and I dont like drafting another player that cant shoot but he has the tools to be the best player we have ever drafted
yall asked for a boom or bust pick...well

JMAC3: Ball was my number 1 guy so to get him at 3 without having to trade up made my night. Think we have a chance to make some noise in a few years and ultimately believe Wiseman was limited upside and Edwards character were more concerning than Melo's. Also think we did pretty well in second round, Carey and Richards should give us much needed depth at Center. Riller is shot in the dark, but he can apparently fill it up so never bad to have a guy like that waiting in the wings.

cornchip: My guess: Wiseman was at the top of our board and Minny was asking for too much (probaly Miles and a lightly protected 2021 1st). So we took Ball who is intriguing and talented but I struggle to see the fit. It seems like he's best in transition but who knows what kind of rebounding team we'll be.
It's really going to come down to his shooting imo. I think the FO saw enough in his shooting potential to think he'll be servicable. If he can't shoot, how does he beat defenders using his passing? He isn't overpowerful going to like Simmons, Doncic, and Mitchell, he can't use the threat of his jumper like Murray or Kemba, and he doesn't have the explosive quickness of a Mitchell or Westbrook. It actually reminds me of Lonzo except LaMelo is bigger and more adept in the pick and roll.
On the Carey pick, you could always use a big guy who can bang a bit....but he got switched out on and beat in college. I think he has value but I see him as a situational player.

CuseMayne: LaMelo - Hopefully I can be proved wrong as he's been the player I wanted to avoid during this whole process. As the initial disappointment has worn off, though, if he's going to work his tail off to be a servicable shooter, he does have a few elite skills, and we have young pieces all around that will, at least, make us a fun team to watch. Him being 6'7 could work to play alongside Tae/Terry/Malik, and if he's able to open everything up for Miles/PJ/Twins/McDaniels, it could be really cool. It's a boom or bust pick that nobody can fault us for doing, and it either really clicks or we go back to the drawing board (and the next 2 drafts are seemingly amazing). I think a lot of my, perhaps unfair, bias is how annoyed I've been with the family (mainly LaVar) for the last few years.
Vernon Carey Jr. - Seems pretty promising. Again, at first my knee jerk reaction was negative and that we were picking a slow C with uninspiring measurables that seemed to just be a good college player and the second coming of Al Jefferson at best. The fact that he's seemingly been working a ton and dropped 30 pounds, had a very impressive freshman year, and seems pretty damn polished for a 19 year old has me optimistic. If he earns it I think he should be the backup C this year.
Nick Richards - Similar measurables to Wiseman, seems really athletic and made big strides at Kentucky this year, and for a 2024 second round pick, seems like a solid gamble. Him and Carey seem like opposite players, so it's cool to in a way pit them against one another. After watching some highlights, he reminds me of Nerlens Noel a bit. Definitely happy that we're taking another chance in this draft for some legitimate size and length down low. Might have previous chemistry with PJ as well. See how he does in the G-League, will be a fun player to monitor.
Grant Riller - At first kinda threw my hands up wondering why we picked another PG. Then watched some tape, and sheesh, looks like the guy is a professional scorer. Definitely worth taking a chance at the 56th pick. Three level scorer with a deadly first step and sneaky athleticism at 6'3. Reminded me a bit of Fred VanVleet...who went undrafted and earned his way from the G-League to a big time contributor for a championship. So yeah, let him ball out in the G-League and see what happens.
Nate Darling - Looks like he averaged 21.0PPG for Delaware in 2019-2020. Presumably a shooter, seems like a reasonable candidate for a two-way contract. Let's see how he does in the G-League. Pretty cool name, seems harmless/fitting for a Canadian.
My draft grade for 2020: B+

Vanderbilt_Grad: LaMelo Ball – The team didn’t give up assets to move up and still got a guy that most of the national media was projecting to be the best player available at #1. There are real concerns around LaMelo, but his best case outcome is absurdly good. He was a no-brainer pick at #3 given that the team’s better fit targets (Edwards & Wiseman) were off the board. I have a good feeling about his development path and Charlotte as a landing spot for him in that respect … but I also forecast long term difficulty with both his family and with him wanting to be in a larger market. For the record Okongwu, Halliburton, and Vassell were the guys I most wanted, but I can’t be mad about the LaMelo pick. He has the most upside and potential will alter the course of the franchise for years to come.
Vernon Carey Jr. – Love this pick. I’m skeptical of burning lottery picks on traditional big men, but getting a guy with Carey’s offensive potential in the second round is amazing. Gut feeling is that he will turn out to be a starter and will play really well with LaMelo. I would have picked Xavier Tillman in a vacuum, but Vernon is probably a better fit with LaMelo.
Nick Richards – Can bring the defense that Carey hasn’t show so far. Really like that the team drafted someone with a very different skillset and can see which one develops. I expect that he’ll be an NBA player for several years which is really all you can ask for with a 2nd round pick. Nick is found money since none of us were expecting Mitch to trade for a pick.
Grant Riller – If Riller develops this pick has the potential to be a steal. The team has had really good luck with 2nd round guys so far, and Riller seems like the kind of guy who could actually make it. Had no preference here, but was happy with the pick.
Overall I have to give the team an A-. This was a strong draft showing by Mitch.

UNCNYC:My official picks were
3 - Tyrell Terry
32 - Tyler Bey
56 - Ty'shon Alexander
But I might replace Alexander for any of the UNDRAFTED players of the 2020 draft down the line.

IAN:I wanted to have Wiseman or Hayes but I still like the LaMelo pick. I'm confident that our coaching staff and the young guys we have will have a good effect on him. He may have said that he doesn't think his shooting form needs some work but that will change. I hope Melo turns out to be a superstar because God knows we're long overdue.

316Hornets: I didn't think Lamelo would want to play for us. He seems excited so I would choose Lamelo Ball here if he indeed likes Charlotte. I had him at 100 rating before questioning his loyalty. If there was any question about his loyalty, I would've traded back and chose Hayes.
#32:
After choosing Lamelo, getting an enforcer was all I could think about. I wanted big bully center. Oturu was considered, but ultimately I agree with what the team did here and agree with choosing Vernon Carey Jr.. He is the more physical guy of the two.
#56:
At 56, I wanted Scrubb but he went at 55. So, my choice would be Louis Olinde

luciano-davidwesley: I would have considered Okongwu long and hard but ultimately would have probably drafted Ball too seeing as though Wiseman was off the board.
I don't know enough about the second round prospects to really comment but I definitely would have taken Tyrell Terry if he dropped one more spot to us at 32.

Diop: the only draft pick I've not wanted more than Ball was Biyombo after watching him lose against a chair. But unless there was a market to trade down (will never know, and I don't want to hear your crap Ainge) I'm happy with taking the last of the big 3.
I still liked Hayes and OO who would have been my targets if we could trade down. My ideal night would be trading 3 to Detroit for 7 and 16, taken Hayes and maybe Pokuševski (hope for a unicorn) or even Bey who Detroit got at 19. But that was probably never possible.
I wanted Tilman at #32, but I'm happy with Carey Jr, he seems to talented in the paint to be ignored.
Riller sounds cool as well. The only name I had at that stage was Wesson as a stretch 5. I still think he should land somewhere.
Every year, once the draft is finished, I automatically end up optimistic about who we pick thinking the team must have got it right. Until they slowly kill my soul

Snidely FC: 3: we took Ball
I'd have taken: Tyrese Haliburton
32: we took Vernon Carey Jr
I'd have taken: Xavier Tillman
56: we took Grant Riller
I'd have taken: Sam Merrill

SWedd523: Hornets Pick #3: Ball
My Pick at #3: Okongwu
Hornets Pick #32: Carey
My Pick at #32: Oturu then Bey then Carey
Hornets Pick #56: Riller
My Pick at #56: By this point I didn't care, Riller seems like a good option

Rich4114:It was simple for me, my pick was going to be whichever of Ball, Edwards or Wiseman was available at 3. I would've ranked them as Wiseman 1a, Ball 1b, Edwards 1c. Not worried about fit since we aren't competing and the roster is still a work in progress. As for #32, I was really hoping we could get Jaden McDaniels, but that's mostly because I've heard him talked up recently, he has an attitude and his brother plays on our team already and it'd be fascinating. I am actually very enticed by Vernon Carey though, I didn't know much about him until after we took him and he seems legit. My take is that he's highly undervalued by today's NBA standards, but his talent is unquestionable. I expect him to have a place on the roster come opening night.


Kemba/Rozier Sign and Trade:
Spoiler:
Vanderbilt_Grad - "My on record here - Mitch's offer to Kemba was fair in a coldhearted mathematical sense. There was risk in a big contract given Kemba's age and past knee issues ... and MJ's desire to avoid the tax if not winning is a real thing the team has to consider. If Kemba wasn't going to take that level of pay, then the team was better off committing to a rebuild. I can also see why it would have pissed Kemba off. It wasn't a loyalty offer. It wasn't a show of appreciation. It wasn't a 'take a pay cut so we can sign other great help for you.' Instead he got a 'we see you as worth X instead of Y offer' with no trades or free agent signing in sight to really help the team make it to the next level. I'm fine with the pivot to signing Rozier after Kemba left. Elf has been run off two bad teams. Rubio was too expensive. Lin was way worse than I thought. The team is making a bet that Terry will be a real NBA starter. It will be interesting to see if it works out or not."

BigSlam - "I'll go on the record as saying I have no problem with the offer they made to Kemba (assuming the offer was 5/$160).
It was a risk to go in low but if Kemba signed off on it it would have been a massive win for us.
If he was willing to negotiate we had a starting point and could have built up from there.
Unfortunately it would appear Kemba wasn't interested in negotiating and only gave us 1 kick at the can - which I find very interesting. I viewed our offer as a calculated risk. I'm more happy that we didn't sign Kemba at 5/$200-$221 (like some were saying we should have) than I am sad at losing him.
On Rozier: Don't like it. Think he's now being paid double his worth and his signing was a desperation move by the FO when they knew they lost Kemba. Would have been able to rationalize the 3 year deal if it was more like 3/30 and not 3/60. I would have much rather gone into next season with Devonte as our starting PG and signed a cheaper young vet PG to back him up (Elfrid Payton). I'm also worried about how Roziers game will compliment the games, playing styles, needs and development of our younger players (Devonte, Monk, Bacon, Bridges and PJ)."

amcoolio - "Like taking a flyer on Rozier, who I think can have a Kemba like leap. He’s got swag. I don’t like the third year. We should have done 2/38. I love Kemba but 5/221 was too tough a pill to swallow."

25centsandwich - "This was a total disaster. Hope I'm wrong about the results but at this point it's just an absolutely embarassing fiasco. And the more information that gets out, the worse it gets. Arguably the best player in franchise history, the franchises all time leading scorer, a fan favorite, a great locker room guy who has been criminally underpaid (and to add, he publicly stated he would take less than what he could've got multiple times)....and we offer him less than what guys got who aren't even consistent All-Stars. The 5 yr/190 mil contract was the obvious deal to be had. If Kemba walked away from that then I could understand. But to offer him less on a per year basis than what he could've gotten on the open market is just an indefensible decision."

driveandkick - I get all the complaints but I'm totally cool with it. As soon as we found out Kemba was gone we knew the tank was commencing. Tanking is about doing three things: accumulating draft picks, bringing in young players, and creating future cap space for when you hope to compete again. Rozier accomplishes the second thing on that list and hear me out, the third thing too. Yes we're paying him a ton of money over three years, but the thing is we're not even trying to compete for these next two years. We probably won't be during the third year either.

Diop - In regards to Kemba, it was time to move on. I would have preferred a trade last year but I get being unable to due to the all star game. I'm still coming to terms with the Rozier trade but I don't really hate it. It's a way to get something from Kemba leaving and we take a flyer on a young guard. Overpriced, but whatever.

BobsBuddy - IF Rozier performs like he did when filling in for Irving,we then have made a Great decision.

LurkCobain - Listen we all loved Kemba. We loved the nights whe he gave you 60 off 25/30 shooting. Some people tend to forget that he also gave you some 15 off 5/27 nights. After thinking about it some, the team made the right move for the long term. This forces the young guys to jump in the water and stop staring at Kemba like kids waiting for daddy to save them.

bes628 - "Proves we will never be considered an serious franchise under this current leadership. You absolutely do not low ball your franchise GOAT. No serious FA will ever sign here willingly. Our stigma is that we are financially inept, unappreciative, and not committed to winning."

Eoghan(formulary BrotherDave) - On paper the Rozier signing looks bleak. But I'd rather have him than Elfrid Payton I think. I'm just going to be optimistic and hope for the best. On Kemba I wanted the team to trade him for something, anything, and try to retool somehow. They didn't do it b/c it would've been a bad PR move to trade the fan favorite/best player in franchise history. I get that. But now they're getting raked over the coals for letting him walk for nothing anyway. This was a disaster. But honestly I'm not sure if it could be avoided. The NBA landscape is changing so much so fast that standing pat might have been a shrewd move.


2019 Draft:

[12] PJ Washington
Spoiler:
fatlever - "12 - pj"

amcoolio - "love the pick, would have considered Sekou but PJ was my first choice at 12. Did NOT want Little or Clarke based on our roster makeup."

powerforward - "PJ like the pick- solid floor but also has decent ceiling"

JDR720 - "I would call him a medium upside/medium floor player. Kind of like Miles but more skilled offensively. Didn't have any real opinion of anyone pre-draft. That said, im satisfied with the pick. Probably would've picked Sekou. "

dmutombo321 - "I would have taken a flier on Sekou. Has the potential to become a special player of he puts things together. "

MPM - feels eerily like a Hornets pick - productive but not spectacular player on big NCAA program. Safe and reasonable, but after 30+ years of rooting for this team, I'm no longer a fan of safe/reasonable. I do like him better than a lot of other options, but would've preferred a swing-for-the-fences Sekou. I'll be rooting for him regardless. He was tier 2 of my faves.

UNCNYC - #12 - NAW I was never big on PJ Washington and do not like the pick at all. I give it a C out of an A. I think McDaniels will end up slightly better than him.

KingCat - Dislike the pick. Very boring and mediocre just like last years. In five years we will see that this pick has made no negative or positive impact on the franchise. There will be atleast 4 guys he was taken ahead of that will have much better careers

JMAC3 - Would have taken PJ

driveandkick - Fine with the choice, I would have taken Clarke if it were up to me but PJ was second on that list. I actually think he pairs very nicely with Miles and could even be a 5 in some fun small ball lineups. People are complaining he has a limited ceiling but I don't buy that considering how much he improved at UK. This was a weak draft anyways.

BigSlam - Pick was PJ Washington: Don't mind the pick.
Pick I would have made is PJ Washington: Feel he shows promise as our future PF who plays both ends and with grit.

countryboi - I love the pick i think he and miles are the future and are going to be very solid together. I think at the very least his floor is old Marv.

Braggins - I probably would have went with Sekou at 12 and I also really liked the idea of trading back. The other options in play at 12 for me were Goga, NAW, and Langford, but I would have preferred to trade back if any of those three were the target. I actually think PJ was a really smart pick and will most likely look even better as time goes on and people see how many of the lottery picks from this draft are not nearly as good as people imagined.

316Hornets - PJ if kept the 12th pick

Bassman - At 12 given the availabile players I wanted Sekou so that would have been my pick. Represented a bigger upside potential in some ways. However I am (naturally) weary of anyone French so maybe we dodged a bullet. I like PJ and think he has real potential as a starter so I’m good with our pick.

Swedd523 - I wanted NAW, Goga, PJ in that order. Was also super intrigued by Langford, but didn't think he was a realistic target. I did not want any part of Clarke, Little, or Porter Jr.

BuzzCity - Hated the PJ pick. Wanted NAW

25centsandwich - Like PJ as a player. Indifferent about the pick. I think PJ will be a solid 12-15 year pro. Could also contribute early but I thought NAW fit more of a need and was a better fit.

chellis - I really liked PJ going in to the draft and am happy with the pick. I also wanted NAW or Sekou.

Snidely FC - I wanted Goga Bitadze, but my second choice was PJ Washington, who I prefer to Rui, Sekou, Clarke, Bol Bol, and all the other non-Goga options (actually would also have been good with Luka Samanic at 12)

Najee - I had P.J. Washington going to Atlanta at No. 10 on my board (before the Hawks' trade with New Orleans), so Charlotte picking him at this spot is not that outrageous. Of the players on the board, I liked Sekou Doumbouya the most. He seems to run in transition really well for a player his size, looks to be taller than his listed 6-foot-9 and seems to have some good offensive tools.

Liver_Pooty - NAW, Semou, PJ. I think it was Swedd that really got me warmed up to PJ in the draft chat. I was "ok" with him before. I think NAW is going to be really good. Wanted Semou just because its one of those extreme high upside bust ordeals and its fun to pay attention to.

Chapelchilla - I liked the PJ pick but wanted Goga a bit more at the time.
After seeing the PJ tape more extensively, I like the pick even more. He should be a quality NBA starter.

predators - Langford is the only guy I thought had a higher ceiling and has a reasonable shot at reaching it. No real complaints with P.J. Would have also been fine with Sekou or Little here.

Vanderbilt_Grad - PJ was the guy I wanted.

SpearNMgicHelmt - "12: Sekou Doumbouya. I was okay with PJ Washington though.

KembatheMeteor(formily BizGilWalker) -#12 - honestly no clue, I was sure one of Hachimura or Hayes would fall, but wanted to trade down or out again.

BeesWax - I like the PJ pick and think he will be a solid player for us. Fits well with what we want our 4s to do and can play some small ball 5 IMO.

yasuhara2241 - I feel really good about the PJ pick. For me it was between him and Sekou.

[36] Cody Martin
Spoiler:
fatlever = "36 - bol bol"

amcoolio - "meh pick, wanted a flyer on high upside player like Bol or Jontay Porter"

powerforward - "I think we accidently took the wrong twin/ not a big fan - wish we would have traded up and got additional pick and got carson Edwards (little jameer nelson vibes to him)"

JDR720 - "Im fine with it, can probably be a solid role-player. Probably would've picked Bol."

dmutombo321 - even with his medical red flags and post injury weight loss, Bol is a tremendous talent and should have been their man. It doesn't get much more low risk and high reward at a pick this low.

MPM - feels like a wasted pick. Bol, Schofield, Gafford, and Horton-Tucker were all on the board and I would've taken any of them (BPA) over Martin. Count me in for Bol here.

UNCNYC - #36 - Joshua Obeisie - I am happy it's Cody Martin and not Caleb due to his ability to play multiple positions including PG. I woulda SLIGHTLY rather had Justin James tho. I will give this grade a C+ because he can play so many positions.

KingCat - Hate this pick. Will never play consistent minutes. Will be playing in the Mexico league within 4 years.

JMAC3 - Would have taken Talen Horton Tucker

driveandkick - Actually like it a lot. He's a high floor guy that is just a good basketball player. 6'6" PG types are always worth taking a chance on. If he can shoot he absolutely has a role in this league.

BigSlam - I had no idea who this dude is. Didn't like the pick.
Pick I would have made is *Daniel Gafford: Feel we needed to address our 5 with an athletic shot blocking and rebounder.
* = If I could have moved up 2 spots by combining our picks #36 and #52 to draft Bruno Fernando who was taken #34 I 100% would have done that. I really like Fernando.

countryboi - I do love a big point but he was a reach i think we could have gotten him at 52 and I would have liked a low risk high reward project like Bol Bol.

316Hornets - Bol Bol

Bassman - At 36 I really didn’t have any knowledge of a particular player still on the board that I wanted (not Bol). Cody strikes as a serviceable bench guy, so hopefully he blossoms into something more. Looks pretty good on tape but was frankly a “who’s that?” when I saw his name.

Swedd523 - I wanted them to trade up and get Fernando as soon as he fell out of the first round. Of the available guys I would've preferred Gafford or Schofield.

BuzzCity - Bol Bol

25centsandwich - Cody Martin. Did not like this pick at all. Martin never impressed me much. Both he and his brother were good college players who had the ball a ton. Would've liked Gafford here if we took NAW. With PJ would've went with Admiral.

chellis - Martin is a good player but a far stretch at 36. I believe he would have been available at 52. I 100% would have taken THT with this pick.

Snidely FC - Hoped Luka Samanic or Grant Williams would fall to us here. With Samanic and Williams gone, wanted Bruno; with Bruno gone I would have taken Talen Horton-Tucker. I thought we would find good value at this pick, disappointed the team reached for a guy many expected to go undrafted

Najee - With some of the projected potential first-round picks falling (Bruno Fernando, K.Z. Okpala), it would have made sense for Charlotte to have gotten involved. Okpala was a player I liked coming into the draft but he was gone at No. 32; I would have offered the No. 36 and 52 picks to move up.

Chapelchilla - I wish the had traded up for Goga, Samanic or Bruno with the 2nd rounders but apparently it was way hard to pull off this year. I don't have high hopes for Martin but we can use a big defensive guard with some creative passing skills. If he is that, I'm fine with the pick to help replace Lamb (starting Bacon, play Martin as back up)

preadtors - 2nd round picks are hard to get worked up over. 6'7" guard that can do a little bit of everything is fine by me even if he is a 5 year senior. In typical Charlotte fashion all the "lay up" 2nd rounders went right before we picked, I bet we panicked a little here.

Vanderbilt_Grad - I had really hoped for a center with Claxton & Bruno falling into the 2nd, but both were gone by 36. I'm willing to give Cody 2.0 (Martin) a chance, but probably would have gone with Bol Bol here.

KembatheMeteor(formily BizGilWaker) - #36 - Admiral Schoefield

BeesWax - Martin was a stretch for me. I like him as a player but don’t. Like the value in the pick. Would rather take a flier on a high ceiling guy like Bol or Porter and hope Martin fell to 52. Like his skill set and don’t mind having him but just not at that spot.

yasuhara2241 - #36: I wanted to trade up for Kabengele or Bruno Fernando but at that pick I was willing to take the flier on Bol Bol. Now after reading up on Cody Martin I don't mind the pick but just don't see the immediate impact.
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,536
And1: 9,904
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#2 » by amcoolio » Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:26 pm

PJ Washington - love the pick, would have considered Sekou but PJ was my first choice at 12. Did NOT want Little or Clarke based on our roster makeup.

Cody Martin - meh pick, wanted a flyer on high upside player like Bol or Jontay Porter
powerforward
Junior
Posts: 409
And1: 59
Joined: Nov 04, 2006

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#3 » by powerforward » Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:49 pm

PJ like the pick- solid floor but also has decent ceiling

cody martin- I think we accidently took the wrong twin/ not a big fan

wish we would have traded up and got additional pick and got carson Edwards (little jameer nelson vibes to him)
powerforward
Junior
Posts: 409
And1: 59
Joined: Nov 04, 2006

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#4 » by powerforward » Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:52 pm

and sooner or later we have to get the best guy available to us, percentages just have to work for us eventually.

missed on kahwi, klay, butler, Draymond, beal, lillard, booker, Giannis, mitchell - don't think this year changed that but sooner or later it has to happen for us
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 43,755
And1: 45,042
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#5 » by JDR720 » Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:57 pm

PJ- I would call him a medium upside/medium floor player. Kind of like Miles but more skilled offensively. Didn't have any real opinion of anyone pre-draft. That said, im satisfied with the pick. Probably would've picked Sekou.

Cody- Im fine with it, can probably be a solid role-player. Probably would've picked Bol.
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,536
And1: 9,904
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#6 » by amcoolio » Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:06 pm

post who you would have taken guys
User avatar
dmutombo321
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,836
And1: 394
Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Location: Charlotte

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#7 » by dmutombo321 » Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:12 pm

12) I would have taken a flier on Sekou. Has the potential to become a special player of he puts things together.
36)even with his medical red flags and post injury weight loss, Bol is a tremendous talent and should have been their man. It doesn't get much more low risk and high reward at a pick this low.

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]
User avatar
MPM
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,152
And1: 3,682
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
Location: Mouse Town
     

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#8 » by MPM » Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:20 pm

Washington - feels eerily like a Hornets pick - productive but not spectacular player on big NCAA program. Safe and reasonable, but after 30+ years of rooting for this team, I'm no longer a fan of safe/reasonable. I do like him better than a lot of other options, but would've preferred a swing-for-the-fences Sekou. I'll be rooting for him regardless. He was tier 2 of my faves.

Cody Martin - feels like a wasted pick. Bol, Schofield, Gafford, and Horton-Tucker were all on the board and I would've taken any of them (BPA) over Martin. Count me in for Bol here.

McDaniels - why not. #52.
UNCNYC
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 909
Joined: Jun 09, 2014
       

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#9 » by UNCNYC » Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:45 pm

I LOVE these types of threads.

#12 - I was never big on PJ Washington and do not like the pick at all. I give it a C out of an A. I think McDaniels will end up slightly better than him.

#36 - I am happy it's Cody Martin and not Caleb due to his ability to play multiple positions including PG. I woulda SLIGHTLY rather had Justin James tho. I will give this grade a C+ because he can play so many positions.

#52 - I like Jalen and I will give this pick a B. It helps his cause that he was ranked so low but I do think he will not dissapoint. I don't think he will be anything more than a role player off the bench but I do think that out of the 3 players drafted he will be the one we will be happier to see.

My picks were

#12 - NAW
#36 - JOSHUA OBIESIE
#52 - TYLER COOK

Sleeper Vanja Marinkovic

Favorite non drafted players BJ Taylor, Troy Baxter Jr, Kerwin Roach
UPDATED 5-5-2025



These are who I want with our picks in order



R1 - Flagg, Harper, Carter Bryant, Maxine Raynaud, Jase Richardson
R2 - Milos Uzan, WC 2, Kam Jones, Chase Hunter, Tyrese Proctor, Max Shulga, NiQue Clifford, Will Richard, J. Tonji
User avatar
KingCat
Starter
Posts: 2,138
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
   

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#10 » by KingCat » Fri Jun 21, 2019 11:09 pm

PJ: Dislike the pick. Very boring and mediocre just like last years. In five years we will see that this pick has made no negative or positive impact on the franchise. There will be atleast 4 guys he was taken ahead of that will have much better careers

Cody Martin: Hate this pick. Will never play consistent minutes. Will be playing in the Mexico league within 4 years.

Jalen McDaniels: Awful kid. Done horrible things. I hope he will be cut by October and I think he will be as well.
Your Charlotte Hornets! We’ll eventually get something right;right?
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 12,904
And1: 5,977
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#11 » by JMAC3 » Fri Jun 21, 2019 11:53 pm

KingCat wrote:PJ: Dislike the pick. Very boring and mediocre just like last years. In five years we will see that this pick has made no negative or positive impact on the franchise. There will be atleast 4 guys he was taken ahead of that will have much better careers

Cody Martin: Hate this pick. Will never play consistent minutes. Will be playing in the Mexico league within 4 years.

Jalen McDaniels: Awful kid. Done horrible things. I hope he will be cut by October and I think he will be as well.


I bet you are a blast at parties...

Saying there will be 4 players drafted after PJ who have better careers then him, is like saying 4 kids in your graduating class will make more money in their lifetime then your high school valedictorian. Odds are that yes 4 guys will end up better, but which 4? Not a bold statement when you get the entire field vs him.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 12,904
And1: 5,977
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#12 » by JMAC3 » Fri Jun 21, 2019 11:55 pm

I would of taken...

12: PJ

36: Talen Horton Tucker

52: Jalen Lecque


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
KingCat
Starter
Posts: 2,138
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
   

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#13 » by KingCat » Sat Jun 22, 2019 12:36 am

JMAC3 wrote:
KingCat wrote:PJ: Dislike the pick. Very boring and mediocre just like last years. In five years we will see that this pick has made no negative or positive impact on the franchise. There will be atleast 4 guys he was taken ahead of that will have much better careers

Cody Martin: Hate this pick. Will never play consistent minutes. Will be playing in the Mexico league within 4 years.

Jalen McDaniels: Awful kid. Done horrible things. I hope he will be cut by October and I think he will be as well.


I bet you are a blast at parties...

Saying there will be 4 players drafted after PJ who have better careers then him, is like saying 4 kids in your graduating class will make more money in their lifetime then your high school valedictorian. Odds are that yes 4 guys will end up better, but which 4? Not a bold statement when you get the entire field vs him.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Lmao this is one of the worst analogies I have ever seen :lol: . First of all, highschool classes tend to have 500 or more kids graduating at a time. Second off, all the graduating students will all go off to have very different careers and go into many different fields. All the men drafted along with PJ last night are basketball players who are going onto play basketball...There were only like 50 other dudes drafted after PJ, not 500 to compare him to. A much smaller sample size than a highschool class. And fine, I will bite on your question

Players I predict will have better careers than PJ that were drafted after him: Sekou, Naw, Samanic, Goga, Clarke, Poole, KZ.

We have just been spurred and disappointed by "safe" picks like PJ so many times before. Remember the MKG-Iggy comparisons. Remember Zeller-Aldrigde, Remember Frank-Pau? Last year we were even seeing Miles compared to the like of Barkely and LJ. And now this year we got "PJ is the next David West!" In reality he won't even see the court next year.

Don't get me wrong, I hope I am wrong about every single one of the players we drafted.

I hope PJ picks up a handle and becomes a protypical 3-4 you need to strive in the NBA today. I hope Martin was just hiding his potential this whole time so his twin brother doesn't fall in his shadow and turns out to be a modern day Grant Hill. I hope McDaniels was wrongfully accused, and it turns out he has been secretly preaching safe sex and the benefits of abstinence to youths all throughout America.
Your Charlotte Hornets! We’ll eventually get something right;right?
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#14 » by BigSlam » Sat Jun 22, 2019 1:18 am

2019
12th Pick
Pick was PJ Washington: Don't mind the pick.
Pick I would have made is PJ Washington: Feel he shows promise as our future PF who plays both ends and with grit.

36th Pick
Pick was Cody Martin: I had no idea who this dude is. Didn't like the pick.
Pick I would have made is *Daniel Gafford: Feel we needed to address our 5 with an athletic shot blocking and rebounder.
* = If I could have moved up 2 spots by combining our picks #36 and #52 to draft Bruno Fernando who was taken #34 I 100% would have done that. I really like Fernando.

52nd Pick
Pick was Jalen McDaniels: I really didn't care.
Pick I would have made is Jontay Porter: Coming off injury concerns but this late in the draft I would have rolled the dice because had it worked out it would have been huge.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
countryboi
Head Coach
Posts: 7,281
And1: 1,430
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#15 » by countryboi » Sat Jun 22, 2019 2:27 am

PJ washington
I love the pick i think he and miles are the future and are going to be very solid together. I think at the very least his floor is old Marv.

Cody Martin
I do love a big point but he was a reach i think we could have gotten him at 52 and I would have liked a low risk high reward project like Bol Bol.

Jalen McDaniels
This dude is icing I aint expecting much but if he turns in to a player i would be hype
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,221
And1: 9,056
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#16 » by Braggins » Sat Jun 22, 2019 2:54 am

I probably would have went with Sekou at 12 and I also really liked the idea of trading back. The other options in play at 12 for me were Goga, NAW, and Langford, but I would have preferred to trade back if any of those three were the target.

I actually think PJ was a really smart pick and will most likely look even better as time goes on and people see how many of the lottery picks from this draft are not nearly as good as people imagined. Of everyone that went in the top 15, PJ is probably in the top 5 in terms of how likely he is to be a good starter on a playoff team and he has some sneaky upside. I view him as medium/high floor and medium to medium/high upside.

This team is so limited with its roster building options due to past cap mismanagement and the market its in that whiffing on this pick (or last years) would be a serious problem. The "swing for the fences" options we had at 12 in this draft don't really have that much more upside than PJ tbh.

I have no idea about the 2nd round picks.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 12,904
And1: 5,977
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#17 » by JMAC3 » Sat Jun 22, 2019 3:53 am

KingCat wrote:Lmao this is one of the worst analogies I have ever seen :lol: . First of all, highschool classes tend to have 500 or more kids graduating at a time. Second off, all the graduating students will all go off to have very different careers and go into many different fields. All the men drafted along with PJ last night are basketball players who are going onto play basketball...There were only like 50 other dudes drafted after PJ, not 500 to compare him to. A much smaller sample size than a highschool class. And fine, I will bite on your question

Players I predict will have better careers than PJ that were drafted after him: Sekou, Naw, Samanic, Goga, Clarke, Poole, KZ.

We have just been spurred and disappointed by "safe" picks like PJ so many times before. Remember the MKG-Iggy comparisons. Remember Zeller-Aldrigde, Remember Frank-Pau? Last year we were even seeing Miles compared to the like of Barkely and LJ. And now this year we got "PJ is the next David West!" In reality he won't even see the court next year.

Don't get me wrong, I hope I am wrong about every single one of the players we drafted.

I hope PJ picks up a handle and becomes a protypical 3-4 you need to strive in the NBA today. I hope Martin was just hiding his potential this whole time so his twin brother doesn't fall in his shadow and turns out to be a modern day Grant Hill. I hope McDaniels was wrongfully accused, and it turns out he has been secretly preaching safe sex and the benefits of abstinence to youths all throughout America.


High schools sometimes have 40 kids in a class, sometimes 100, and sometimes it’s 1000. Just like kids will go to have different careers so will these players... some will be on playoff teams and be asked to do very little. Some will turn into chuckers who score 18 ppg on awful teams. Matisse Thybulle will be seen as a success if he defends well, makes 36% of threes and averages 20 mins a game, however Sekou or Langford will probably be seen as busts with these stats.

I see Washington having the same effect as a player like Serge Ibaka or Al Horford, not saying they are the exact same types of players. Ibaka is a career 12 and 7 guy with his best season averaging 15 ppg. Al Horford is a career 14 and 8 guy with his best season being 18 ppg (in 29 games) so small sample size.

My point being both of these guys are considered valuable NBA players who most fans would never say they were low ceiling guys or safe. PJ feels like a 15/8 guy who can help anchor a defense with his length, athleticism and high BBIQ.

We are acting like we took PJ in the top 5, this was rumored as a 3 player draft all month. Of course there will be players outside the top 3, but it was widely seen as a tougher draft to evaluate talent. If PJ turns into a starter for 6-8 years for this franchise that’s a success and I think he is capable of being more than that.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,221
And1: 9,056
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#18 » by Braggins » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:22 am

KingCat wrote:PJ: Dislike the pick. Very boring and mediocre just like last years. In five years we will see that this pick has made no negative or positive impact on the franchise. There will be atleast 4 guys he was taken ahead of that will have much better careers

Cody Martin: Hate this pick. Will never play consistent minutes. Will be playing in the Mexico league within 4 years.

Jalen McDaniels: Awful kid. Done horrible things. I hope he will be cut by October and I think he will be as well.

This is going to be true for most of the players taken after the 3rd pick in this draft. PJ will have a better career than at least 4-5 of the 11 guys taken ahead of him as well. There will probably be some mid/late 1st and 2nd round surprises that will end up being among the best in the class, but that doesn't mean everyone taken ahead of them were bad picks... Seems like you are just dead set on being as negative as possible.
User avatar
316Hornets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,209
And1: 2,853
Joined: Jun 26, 2015
Location: Milky Way
   

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#19 » by 316Hornets » Sat Jun 22, 2019 6:37 am

Well, 1st, I would've traded the #12 and moved back. Seeing what kind of names were available, I'd think there was some team out there that would bite. But, barring no trades, my picks would've been:

#12 - PJ
#36 - Bol Bol
#52 - No idea
The Charlotte Hornets will win their first round series against the Boston Celtics in the 2021 Playoffs
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 43,755
And1: 45,042
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Not Revisionist History: Hornets Board 'On Record' about draft/FA/trades 

Post#20 » by JDR720 » Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:13 am

Added to the index for easy finding in the future.

Top of topics of interest section.

Return to Charlotte Hornets