MPM wrote:JMAC3 wrote:Richards and Carey are going to be standing there looking like baby deer in the headlights as teams run layup lines on us. I don't really understand why this board needs to see them fail before they drop it. Would you really feel better if Carey played 20 minutes a game and looked like complete dog ****? Because as a 19 year old second rounder, that is almost surely going to be the case. Let them go to the Gleague bubble, get some confidence and play some major minutes and once they get back maybe they will be ready.
I appreciate your thoughtful take on things - often more so when I disagree with it - but an awful lot of "this board" in your posts. Doesn't make for effective communication - 'everyone thinks this and thinking this is stupid.' Could be 100% wrong, but I don't recall anyone here wanting more than limited or garbage time for either Carey or Richards - a minute or four of learning on the job. If there's anyone out there that truly thinks either should be seeing serious, consistent court time (stealing minutes from Zeller/Biz), please raise your hand, so you can debate directly and spare the rest of us.
And, I totally agree with you on one point. If coach and crew think neither are ready to contribute at all right now (which I can fully appreciate), they need to be seeing lots of time in the G. Again, if they belong in the G, put them in the G to figure out what we've got. If you're gonna keep them on the bench, the only opportunity to vet and develop is via spot minutes.
Yeah, I apologize if anyone feels like I grouped them into something they were not apart of. Just hard to remember exactly who says what all the time, but I know it is something that has brought up a lot by a lot of different people. My take on playing Richards 4-5 minutes a night is you are probably taking those minutes away from PJ or Bridges and also those 4-5 minutes can be the difference between us staying close enough to pull out a win or lose by double digits.
It is going to be hard for those minutes to come from Biz because we already are playing small with PJ, so likely it means that PJ plays less center which means less minutes for him at 5 and less minutes for Bridges at 4. If we start to really suck and we know for a fact our season is in the gutter I am for playing the rookies, but for me it is way to early to put a player on the court who has consistently not done anything or players who were the same age/draft slot have consistently not done anything. It is just setting it up for failure and disappointment. Just because we have no better options doesn't all of sudden increase the chances that Vernon will be good vs the history of the NBA.
It is the same thing with us being disappointed with Bridges, but in reality most players taken 12-16 who are forwards have taken 2-4 years to really become anything of worth. Just because we are a bad team and Bridges is one our better players doesn't mean he should have to perform at the level of a top 5 pick because we do not have anything better, it is putting unrealistic expectations on that player.