CHARLOTTE BOBCATS WAIVE GUARD JEFF MCINNIS
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
CHARLOTTE BOBCATS WAIVE GUARD JEFF MCINNIS
- DaBassSource
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 830
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
CHARLOTTE BOBCATS WAIVE GUARD JEFF MCINNIS
Just got this is a fan email....
CHARLOTTE BOBCATS WAIVE GUARD JEFF MCINNIS
February 29, 2008
CHARLOTTE BOBCATS WAIVE GUARD JEFF MCINNIS
February 29, 2008
- fluffernutter
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,690
- And1: 52
- Joined: Oct 10, 2007
- Location: Here
- fatlever
- Senior Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 58,793
- And1: 15,393
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Terrapin Station
-
wow. that is shocking. i wonder if jeff is going to try to hook up with a playoff team needing a 3rd pg or something, ala cassell (to a much lesser extent, of course). i cant imagine this was a result of some kind of clash.
so does this mean that boykins will start at pg with felton at shooting guard? i cant imagine they will let felton play pg all by himself.
so does this mean that boykins will start at pg with felton at shooting guard? i cant imagine they will let felton play pg all by himself.
- floppymoose
- Senior Mod - Warriors
- Posts: 59,230
- And1: 17,329
- Joined: Jun 22, 2003
- Location: Trust your election workers
- fluffernutter
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,690
- And1: 52
- Joined: Oct 10, 2007
- Location: Here
floppymoose wrote:fluffernutter is back!
This news was just insane enough to pull me back.
I see it this way:
1) We are completely tanking, will run Boykins at the point, and Felton combo-guard or something. We will get killed.
2) We have decided to see if Felton can run the team (what team we have) for the remainder of the season. If he does well (given our current team), he's the PG. If not, he's traded or we draft another PG.
Honestly, there cant' be another reason, outside of McInnis totally pissing off Vincent.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,453
- And1: 16,996
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
Well, the only thing -- besides injuries -- that has been shown to give Felton more opportunities as our starting PG is cutting any possible competitors for that spot, so I guess that's what this was for.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
- DaBassSource
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 830
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
It's called the bench...they could have just cut his mins....can't believe you have to cut him just to play Ray...not buying it...they cut him because he sucks...W_HAMILTON wrote:Well, the only thing -- besides injuries -- that has been shown to give Felton more opportunities as our starting PG is cutting any possible competitors for that spot, so I guess that's what this was for.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,453
- And1: 16,996
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
They tried that after we signed Boykins. You know, back when McInnis was banished to the bench, and I believe he didn't get any minutes for a game or two? Well, what happened is we proceeded to suck just as much, if not worse, and McInnis ended up starting again before too long.
So, no, you pretty much have to cut them. No one in their right mind is going to keep someone on the bench when the person playing ahead of them is playing poorly, especially if their job is on the line and they probably need to win at all costs.
So, no, you pretty much have to cut them. No one in their right mind is going to keep someone on the bench when the person playing ahead of them is playing poorly, especially if their job is on the line and they probably need to win at all costs.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
- doc.end
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,086
- And1: 191
- Joined: May 04, 2006
- Location: Prague, CZE
I actually think that this is very terrible. Something tells me that this is a solution of Vincent-McInnis dispute. So they waived McInnis to show support to this coach. It seems he can get another chance next year. Which is a disaster for the organization and very harmful for the fanbase. I hope it won't be that bad, because Vincent can be only better coaach next year there is not much room to be even worse.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,319
- And1: 4,673
- Joined: Mar 11, 2004
- Location: PA
-
lol, wtf. I get back and see this. Whatever, I'm glad we're going with Felton as PG now. Once Wallace gets back it'll be interesting to see how everything meshes. He must've been stirring **** up in the locker room or something. Maybe Jordan was reading our message boards or finally looked at the fact that Mcinnis adds nothing to our team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,319
- And1: 4,673
- Joined: Mar 11, 2004
- Location: PA
-
Couldn't they put the focus on Felton playing PG by just having Mcinnis back him up? I mean wtf? Couldn't they have just let BK be the backup here instead of be the backup for the Clippers? Why is it so difficult to play guys in the right positions for this organization? 2 coaches for this franchise so far, both suck at rotations and player management.
I'm not pissed Mcinnis isn't on our team anymore or anything, but i just don't get where they come up with these ways of thinking.
That being said, I thought Felton played well against the Celtics and we had lots of chances to win that game. Rebounding and defense killed us.
I'm not pissed Mcinnis isn't on our team anymore or anything, but i just don't get where they come up with these ways of thinking.
That being said, I thought Felton played well against the Celtics and we had lots of chances to win that game. Rebounding and defense killed us.