Man, wouldn't it be nice to have Herrmann on the team right now?
Like, seriously?
Not to beat a dead horse but...
Moderators: JDR720, Diop, fatlever, yosemiteben, BigSlam
Not to beat a dead horse but...
-
fluffernutter
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,690
- And1: 52
- Joined: Oct 10, 2007
- Location: Here
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
-
BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,358
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
Not really. I mean, he was fun and could stroke the 3, but he was a poor rebounder and not a great man, post or help defender (although he worked hard at trying to deny the entry pass)
I'm not sure he would provide what it is that we need at the 4.
I'm not sure he would provide what it is that we need at the 4.
B B M F 'ers
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
-
e4Nf6
- Starter
- Posts: 2,046
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 11, 2007
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
Probably better than what we have, although I kind of suspect he would be sitting next to Matt Carrol in Larry Brown purgatory right now. Not a good time to be a jump-shooter around here
I think he's best playing 15-20mins off the bench where he won't get beat up to much on defense.
I think he's best playing 15-20mins off the bench where he won't get beat up to much on defense.
=/∞
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
-
Rich4114
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,492
- And1: 4,174
- Joined: Mar 11, 2004
- Location: PA
-
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
Speaking of Hammer, I guess LB tried him out yesterday instead of Ammo. That did not go well at all.
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
-
doc.end
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,086
- And1: 191
- Joined: May 04, 2006
- Location: Prague, CZE
Re: Not to beat a dead horse but...
Irony, right?BigSlam wrote:Not really. I mean, he was fun and could stroke the 3, but he was a poor rebounder and not a great man, post or help defender (although he worked hard at trying to deny the entry pass)
I'm not sure he would provide what it is that we need at the 4.
