Page 1 of 1
Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:29 pm
by ohara
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3916703In my opinion, the Bulls just got a lot better. Solid big man and a young scorer. Bulls fans should be happy. I also think this kills our hopes for the 8th spot. Chicago has more talent than us now and we would have to beat them out for the 8th spot. Not happening this year.
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:54 pm
by Felton for Pres
ILBIT
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:02 pm
by W_HAMILTON
ILBIT isn't defined by
www.urbandictionary.com yet so ???
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:20 pm
by BigSlam
Pretty much spells the end of Ben Gordon there - right?
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:58 pm
by Walt Cronkite
I was stunned that BBBBBBBK hadn't been defined, either.
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:00 am
by Walt Cronkite
BigSlam wrote:Pretty much spells the end of Ben Gordon there - right?
He should take OKC's money and run.
Westbrook-Gordon-The Durantchula-Green-Chandler + their lottery pick..imagine if it was Griffin!
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:21 pm
by doc.end
Walt Cronkite wrote:BigSlam wrote:Pretty much spells the end of Ben Gordon there - right?
He should take OKC's money and run.
Westbrook-Gordon-The Durantchula-Green-Chandler + their lottery pick..imagine if it was Griffin!
But no more Chandler there - they rescinded the trade after physicals.
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:41 pm
by e4Nf6
Ugh...Not loooking good for us. The Bulls just got a bit better.
I understand Gooden for Miller but Salmons for Noc is puzzling. Its just a downgrade and I dont believe they`re really saving any money there. I can`t believe the kings couldnt have done better with Salmons than that.
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:19 pm
by Walt Cronkite
e4Nf6 wrote:Ugh...Not loooking good for us. The Bulls just got a bit better.
I understand Gooden for Miller but Salmons for Noc is puzzling. Its just a downgrade and I dont believe they`re really saving any money there. I can`t believe the kings couldnt have done better with Salmons than that.
Yea, this was a weird trade. Salmons is actually more $$$ than Nocioni right now since he had around a 2m trade kicker.
Re: Bulls and Kings Deal
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:33 pm
by chrbal
For the Kings it kind of seems like they gave up and just took that deal. Teams are too in love with the "descending" contracts.
Ike Diogu for Michael Ruffin. My god has he fallen off.