~Official 2009 Mock Draft Thread~

[Paydro70]

OK, well, since we didn't win the lotto, here's Chad Ford's first effort at a mock draft, it has us taking Gerald Henderson (with all the good SGs taken before him): http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2009 ... aft-090519

Any thoughts? I am not thrilled at all by Henderson, but only Clark really strikes me as a guy we might want to take above him if it goes as Ford says 1-11.

I wasn't even remotely thinking we were going to win the lotto, but the Clips winning was pretty disappointing for me as an NBA fan... I don't want to see Griffin rotting away there for a few years. Oh well, I guess.

[ohara]

The way Ford describes it, it sounds a lot like Henderson is the second coming of Raja Bell. And that would make LB pretty happy I would think. Terrific defense and good offense when he's hot. Wont be too disappointed if we end up with him. Still can hope that something freaky happens and someone starts to slide and winds up falling to us. Tyreke Evans is someone I could see have that happen perhaps.

[amcoolio]

I honestly don't see us keeping the pick. I feel a lot like 2007, when I knew we would trade out.

[Bassman]

If we move the pick it would likely be part of a broader trade involving players, and I hope that develops. However, I cannot see any player (other than Griffin) worth moving up for that involves a significant existing player and the #12 pick. I mean, would you deal Diaw and the #12 for the 1st pick? I might, and I wonder if the Clips might do that since they have Zack in place for several more years at BIG dollars? I'd hate to lose Diaw, but we need a big rebounder and scorer at the 4. Griffin may never be a perfect 4 but he will be a powerful force at that position.

[August Us Seazr]

Bass, Griffin would be the MORE perfect 4 for us. MJ personally needs to explore that possibility TODAY. Sometimes people remember which party asks FIRST. The rest can be worked out. I just hope that they don't try to talk us into taking Zack!

It was interesting to note how different Ford's mock differs tremendously from our Big Board. I guess there is no big difference in any of the players 4-25! Just a matter of "naming your poison"!

By the way, did anybody notice last night that Jay Bilas had Jennings falling to us at 12?!?!?!? What's with that

[RichBoy923]

Los Angeles Clippers - PF Blake Griffin
Memphis Grizzlies - PG Ricky Rubio
Oklahoma City Thunder - C Hasheem Thabeet
Sacramento Kings - PF Jordan Hill
Washington Wizards - SG James Harden
Minnesota Timberwolves - SG Tyreke Evans
Golden State Warriors - PG Brandon Jennings
New York Knicks - SG Stephen Curry
Toronto Raptors - SG Gerald Henderson
Milwaukee Bucks - PG Jeff Teague
New Jersey Nets - SG Demar Derozan
Charlotte Bobcats - SG Terrence Williams
Indiana Pacers - PF James Johnson
Phoenix Suns - SF Earl Clark

Detroit Pistons - PF Gani Lawal
Chicago Bulls PF- DeJuan Blair
Philadelphia 76ers - PG Jrue Holiday
Minnesota Timberwolves - C B.J. Mullins
Atlanta Hawks - PG Johnny Flynn
Utah Jazz - SF Chase Budinger
New Orleans Hornets - SG Wayne Ellington
Dallas Mavericks - PG Ty Lawson
Sacramento Kings - PG Nick Calathes
Portland Trail Blazers - SF Sam Young
Oklahoma City Thunder - SG Marucs Thornton
Chicago Bulls - SF Austin Daye
Memphis Grizzlies - PF Tyler Hansbrough
Minnesota Timberwolves - PG Darren Collison
Los Angeles Lakers - PG Patrick Mills
Cleveland Cavaliers - PG Eric Maynor

* I will not be predicting any trades but realize there will obviously be some. Picks based off no trades.

[freakon0mics]

No surprise that most people are pegging us to pick Gerald Henderson. A 6'5 guard that is a bit streaky with his shot and plays really good on the defensive end. Sounds a lot like the current shooting guard we have, doesn't it?

[Benjamin Linus]

Rough mock of the top 14

1. LAC ...... Blake Griffin
2. MEM ..... Ricky Rubio
3. OKC ...... Hasheem Thabeet
4. SAC ...... Brandon Jennings
5. WAS ..... James Harden
6. MIN ...... Demar DeRozan
7. GS ....... Jordan Hill
8. NYK ...... Stephen Curry
9. TOR ..... Tyreke Evans
10. MIL ..... Ty Lawson
11. NJN ...... Earl Clark
12. CHA ..... Terrence Williams
13. IND ...... James Johnson
14. PHO ..... Jonny Flynn

[Badd_Intentions]

Henderson is 1000 times the athlete that Bell could ever dream of being!

[Bassman]

As always there will be plenty of movement and evaluation between now and draft night. I noticed the RealGM mock draft 6 (post lottery) shows an amazing development (which I don't think will happen); Demar DeRozan falling to us at #12!!! That would be our best case scenario if we stay at 12.

Even if I was a psychic and knew this would happen (DeRozan) I would still make a deal to get Griffin with Diaw and our #12. Dunleavy has already said (no surprise) that Blake is their guy, so it's unlikely they would make a deal without getting crazy value in return. I doubt they are below the cap to make such a deal, but I can dream.

[misterglover]

I think that one of the projected top 5 will slip, maybe not alot but outta the top 5 and someone will shoot up the ladder based on either workouts or perceived "potential" the closer we get to the draft. My personal choices are Jordan Hill for the slip & Jrue Holiday for the rise.....so with that in mine I will offer my mock lottery


1 Clippers...... Blake Griffin
2 Grizzlies..... Ricky Rubio
3 Thunder...... Hasheem Thabeet
4 Kings......... Jrue Holiday ( they seem to need a PG more than any other position, I think he will rise)
5 Wizards....... James Harden ( I think they will trade pick + players for Vet but for now he is BPA)
6 TWolves...... Demar DeRozan
7 Warriors...... Tyreke Evans( big combo G w/ PG skils to play w/ Ellis small combo guard w/ PG skills...2=1)
8 Knicks.......... Stephen Curry
9 Raptors....... Jordan Hill (insurance in case they have to replace CB4 at later date)
10 Bucks........ James Johnson (Charlie V might leave & it seems like they have needed a PF for a long time)
11 Nets......... DeJuan Blair( Rod Thorn said he wanted a "beast"...he's the only 1 left)
12 Bobcats..... Earl Clark (surprise!! doesnt fit need but LB values talent see Augustine pick last year)
13 Pacers...... Gerald Henderson (insurance if Marquis leaves or Dunleavy gets hurt again or Rush doesnt pan out plus Larry Legend played w/ his dad)
14 Suns........ Brandon Jennings (Nash's heir apparent..wont be ready for probably 3 yrs anyway)

In this mock how everything fell into place the 'Cats ended up with Earl Clark but I've narrowed my selections down to 2...Earl Clark & Dejuan Blair...neither really fits an immediate need but Clark can play the 3 or 4 and offers to much potential & versatility to overlook and I think DeJuan Blair is a Larry Brown type guy...he's that enforcer dirty work type player he loves.... I think the SG issue will be addressed later and in a different manner...dont forget we also have 2 second rd picks

[coordinator0]

As always there will be plenty of movement and evaluation between now and draft night. I noticed the RealGM mock draft 6 (post lottery) shows an amazing development (which I don't think will happen); Demar DeRozan falling to us at #12!!! That would be our best case scenario if we stay at 12.

Even if I was a psychic and knew this would happen (DeRozan) I would still make a deal to get Griffin with Diaw and our #12. Dunleavy has already said (no surprise) that Blake is their guy, so it's unlikely they would make a deal without getting crazy value in return. I doubt they are below the cap to make such a deal, but I can dream.

There's no shot in hell that Diaw and the #12 could land us the #1 pick, not even Dunleavy is that dumb. I think...

[RichBoy923]

I agree the Kings need a PG but with that high of a pick I don't think it is a good value. They also need a big man which is thin this draft. I think the Kings can wait and get better value at their lower 1st round pick.

[vexco]

you have teague in there twice...just sharing =/

[RichBoy923]

you have teague in there twice...just sharing =/

Yes I did. Thanks it's fixed

[Badd_Intentions]

Especially after the Olokawandi fiasco last time they had the number 1 pick. I don't see them going against the grain this time. I doubt Derozan will fall to us either, would be nice though.

[BigSlam]

Merged to keep all the mocks together.

[Rich4114]

Earl Clark seems like he could be a big league star. Yahoo seems to think he's just a really tall SG (they referred to him as a Mini-Garnett type of guy).

[BigSlam]

SLAM'S 2009 MOCK DRAFT V.1

LA Clippers = Blake Griffin
Worst Case Scenario = Kenyon Martin
Best Case Scenario = Amare Stoudemire

Observations: A physical specimen who oozes raw power. Attacks the rim and the glass with reckless abandon. Very explosive with a very quick 2nd and 3rd jump allows him to dominate the boards. Runs the court very, very well with great speed and a willingness to get up and down. Has some handles so can also run the break a little and is known to rebound on the defensive end, go coast to coast for a throw down on the other end. Can spin very quickly in both directions which shows good footwork.
Doesn’t have a lot of back to the basket moves just yet but has shown some improvement in the area so it’s likely they will develop. Not much of a face up game other than bullying his way into the paint. No real mid range J. Despite being an outstanding athlete, not much of a shot blocker and a very ordinary free throw shooter.

Likely outcome: Super Star. Will add an extra dimension to any team that drafts him. Has a very good chance to hit and surpass his best case scenario.

Why the Clippers? It’s been said that the Clipps might not take Griffin because they already have Randolph, but Randolph is far from a franchise player. He only has two seasons left on his deal so could be traded as an attractive expiring after next season. The other option would be to draft Rubio and look to move Davis, but it would be MUCH harder to move Davis, his longer contract and his under performing ways than it would Randolph.


Memphis Grizzlies = Ricky Rubio
Worst Case Scenario = Rajon Rondo (The pre 2009 playoffs one)
Best Case Scenario = Jason Kidd

Observations: For someone so young he plays with a great understanding of the game and with great poise. Rarely seems to panic and has exceptional vision of the floor seemingly always being able to find the open man no matter where he is. Has great size and an excellent reach along with big hands. Plays within himself and doesn’t force the issue. Takes what the defense gives him and uses it to his advantage.
Not a great shooter at all. Can tend to over dribble the ball a little while waiting for the offense to unfold.

Likely outcome: Star. His shooting might hold him back, but his ability to run an offense and make others look good will make up for it. Has a very good chance to meet his best case scenario.

Why the Grizzlies? With Mayo, Gay and Gasol the Grizzlies have one of the most exciting young cores in the NBA. With a pass 1st guy like Rubio running the show and getting everyone their looks Mayo and Gay will be able to take it to the next level. Rubio and Mayo will be a fantastic defensive back court. Look for Conley to be moved during the season/next summer.


Oklahoma City Thunder = Hasheem Thabeet
Worst Case Scenario = Diop
Best Case Scenario = Mutumbo

Observations: A huge presence on the floor with his size, shot blocking and shot altering abilities. For someone of his size he gets up and down the court fairly well. Massive reach and length means he doesn’t have to leave the ground to block shots so he wont be tempted by head fakes and can usually stay out of foul trouble. Showed that he has the ability to hit a mid range J this year on occasion.
No back to the basket or face up offensive skills at all but shows good timing with put backs and alley oops. Very poor footwork and understanding of how to defend the pick and roll. Wont be able to rely so heavily on his size alone in the NBA and will need to work more on his positioning and core strength.

Likely outcome: Starter. A defensive anchor and specialist for a team for years to come, but pretty much close to a finished product. More than likely will fall short of his best case scenario.

Why the Thunder? They obviously made a huge play for Chandler last season so think they have a hole when it comes to a defensive stopper with size. Thabeet addresses that by the boat load.


Sacremento Kings = Brandon Jennings
To be honest I have never seen him play but I've gone with who is considered to be the best PG here.


Washington Wizards = James Harden
Worst Case Scenario = John Salmons
Best Case Scenario = Joe Johnson

Observations: A super heady player who plays with great patience and has an over whelming calmness. Has the ability with his passing and team play to make those around him better. Good at playing the passing lanes and quick hands result in solid pesky and effective D. Great range on his J all the way out to the NBA 3. Shows a confidence in himself when it comes to taking big shots. Great driving ability and ability to finish at the rim. Surprisingly athletic and strong.
Not a vocal leader. Can delegate too often rather than taking a game over. Went ice cold in the Tourney when the Sun Devils needed him the most.

Likely outcome: Super star. Is the type of player that could slide into any situation and could adapt rather than the situation having to adapt to him. Likely to reach his best case scenario.

Why the Wizards? Along side Gilbert the Wizards would have an explosive scoring line up. Harden has fantastic defensive ability and next to Butler can really hold the wings down. In saying all that, I wouldn’t be surprised if they traded the pick.


Minnesota Timberwolves = Tyreke Evans
Worst Case Scenario = Larry Hughes
Best Case Scenario = Manu Ginobili

Observations: Great body and motor. Able to slice through the key and get where he wants when he wants. Solid handle and great passing. Fantastic defender with huge hands and very quick feet. Very consistent demeanor.
Tends to improvise a little too much which can lead him to taking some ill advised shots or making an ill advised pass. Questionable decision making at times and tries to make the flashy pass rather than the safe pass. Shooting form and results are a little suspect. Is he a PG/SG or a SG/PG?

Likely outcome: Star. It’s going to be a fine line though. He’ll need to land with an accepting coach who will let him play to his strengths and be willing to turn a blind eye to his flaws while working with him to improve them.

Why the Timberwolves? Foye hasn’t really distinguished himself as a PG and seems like he needs a SG next to him who can handle the ball a little and allow him to play off the ball. Evans fits that role nicely. With his slashing ability he should open up lots of looks underneath for Love and Jefferson and along with a healthy Brewer form a dynamic defensive wing tandem.


Golden State Warriors = Gerald Henderson
Worst Case Scenario = Dahntay Jones
Best Case Scenario = Dwayne Wade (poor mans)

Observations: Explosive athlete who can really attack the rack. Nice pull up jumper from mid range. Great slashing ability and willingness to take the ball at the defense. Great defender who is always mindful of his own defensive assignment but is also aware of where everyone else is on the court as well – which allows him to pick off passes but not at the cost of his own match up.
Seems to be a little short but also seems to have a very long wing span which should make up for it. A little inconsistent and seems to get a little too disgruntled a little too quickly.

Likely outcome: Star. Has the potential to be very good as his style would seem to suit the NBA game very well. Likely to meet his best case scenario.

Why the Warriors? Nellie has already made it pretty clear that Crawford isn’t in their long term plans. Henderson is more suited and can play in an up tempo offense which is totally what Nellie ball is. His superb on ball D will make up for the D that Ellis lacks and along with Randolph and Beans becomes a part of their core.


New York Knicks = Stephen Curry
Worst Case Scenario = Mike James
Best Case Scenario = Mike Bibby

Observations: A natural scorer who can put the ball in the hole a variety of ways. Thrives at being “the man” and wants the ball in his hands as often as possible. Understands how to take advantage of the defense and expose their weaknesses. Limitless range on his J. Improved PG skills over the past season showing an ability to run a team at least part time.
Size is a concern as is his need to be a volume scorer. A bit of a tweener. His body doesn’t look like it will get much bigger as he has a slight frame.

Likely outcome: Star. If he can become and prove to be full time PG he has much more value. Either way, likely to meet his best case scenario.

Why the Knicks? It just seems a perfect fit. A heady up and down PG/SG type would thrive under DiAnton and he is said to be very close with LeBron which might help lure him to the big apple.


Toronto Raptors = Demar DeRozan
Worst Case Scenario = Travis Outlaw
Best Case Scenario = Rudy Gay

Observations: A good rebounder considering his size thanks to his athletic ability and the way he can rise above others. Still learning the game. Has a nice looking jump shot remaining very straight and balanced when he shoots. Showed some really nice quick spins allowing him to lose his defender towards the end of the season.
No real range on his J and can’t really create his own offense. Very poor handles and doesn’t finish well with contact (in saying that, he certainly doesn’t shy away from it either). Good defensive stance but very poor understanding. Often face guards his opponent which leaves him vulnerable to back cuts.

Likely outcome: Starter. A long, long, long time project. Really needs to find himself in the perfect situation with a very patient coach who is willing to nurture him. Most likely a rotation/6th man type player. I expect him to fall short of his best case scenario..

Why the Raptors? The Raps hope to hit one out of the park and find the next big thing in the NBA. With holes at both the 2 and 3 spots they can decide which they would like to groom him for more (I personally think he is a 3) and hope that along with Bosh and Bargs can lock things down in TO for the next decade.


Milwaukee Bucks = Jordan Hill
Worst Case Scenario = Chris Wilcox
Best Case Scenario = Chris Bosh (poor mans)

Observations: Moves really well especially when it comes to finding space through the defense. Is able to slither around opposing players to advance his position on the court. Shows great anticipation and an ability to read the play allowing him to be a solid rebounder and doesn’t just use his size, length or athletic ability. Loves to finish with power and throw down hard. An improving shot blocker again thanks to his anticipation and timing.
Doesn’t have any real refinement to his offensive game and doesn’t pass very well out of the double. Not great and putting the ball on the floor – even over two or three dribbles.

Likely outcome: Starter. A good 2nd or 3rd option on offense. Not a defensive anchor type player but not a slouch. Would benefit playing next to a very defensive orientated 7 footer. Likely to fall some where between his worst case and best case scenario.

Why the Bucks? Hill falls pretty hard. He could have gone top 4 if the lottery played out differently – but the Buck are happy. They can now focus all their off season signing energy into Sessions and allow Charlie V to walk unless he wants to re-sign on the cheap. The more mobile Hill is a good teaming with Bogut.


New Jersey Nets = Earl Clark
Worst Case Scenario = Andray Blatche
Best Case Scenario = Marvin Williams

Observations: Looks to have a great frame and body for the NBA and should be able to easily add muscle/size. Very versatile at both ends of the court and able to play multiple positions. Solid face up game with a nice mid range J as well as range out to the college 3. Good team player with a quite but confident demeanor. Runs the court very well and excels in transition. Great mobility.
Lacks any real back to the basket moves or post up moves. Not really the “I’ll lead you follow” type player. Is he a SF/PF or a PF/SF?

Likely outcome: Starter. Good player but probably best playing the 3rd option on offense next to two good scorers. Likely to meet his best case scenario.

Why the Nets? They need and active PF to team next to Lopez who can guard the quicker PF’s in the NBA. With his range and passing he also spreads the floor. With Yi seemingly out the door, Clark replaces him and plays both sides of the ball.


Charlotte Bobcats = Terrence Williams
Worst Case Scenario = Thabo Sefolosha
Best Case Scenario = Andre Iguodala

Observations: A physical specimen with outstanding athletic ability. Prototypical build, speed and agility for an NBA SG. Improving shooter from the floor with NBA range. Fantastic court vision allows him to make passes others might not see and has the ability to actually run the offense from the point position on occasion. An outstanding rebounder for his size and position. Great as picking off passes in the lane and getting out on fast break points. Plays with a swagger.
Terrible free throw shooter. Not great at creating his own shot. More a catch and shoot guy. Given his athletic ability doesn’t drive as much as you would like (maybe because he doesn’t want to get fouled and end up at the line?)

Likely outcome: Star. A very good player with star potential that can compliment others with his unselfish style of game. Most likely able to reach his best case scenario.

Why for the Bobcats? Charlotte are very thin on the wings and need a SG who can step in and help from day #1 looking to learn and replace Bell. Williams is a team orientated SG who will create for others, help on the boards and hit his open J’s.


Indiana Pacers = DeJuan Blair
Worst Case Scenario = Mike Sweetney
Best Case Scenario = Paul Milsap

Observations: A powerhouse of a player. A dynamic player on the boards who fully understands space, how to create it and how to use it to his full advantage. A smart player who is deceptively quick for his side. Not intimidated in the least and in fact in an intimidator himself. Great dedication and commitment on the court. Measurements are a real concern at this stage and even though it’s proven to not be a problem at the college level it’s unknown if he’ll get away with what he has at Pitt in the NBA due to being so undersized and unathletic.

Likely outcome: Bench player. A very valuable 6th man type who could start in the match ups are in his favor, but I just see his lack of height and explosiveness being a real concern at the NBA level. Will do what he does quite well though due to his application.

Why the Pacers? They need a grunt guy who can make life a little easier for Granger. Having a wide body like Blair should allow some breathing room for Granger. Blair seems like a Larry Bird type player.


Phoenix Suns = Ty Lawson
Worst Case Scenario = Raymond Felton
Best Case Scenario = Chris Paul (homeless mans)

Observations: Strong bodied PG with a great motor. Very quick in the open court and able to push the ball. Ball hawk and great help defender allows him to rack up the steals and quick enough that if he does gamble he can get back and not negatively effect his team D. Improved shooter. Protects the ball very well. Fearless going to the rack with the ball. Great vision and passing.
A little small. Has been injured often and missed lots of games. Might be close to being a finished product with little upside left.

Likely outcome: Starter. Could quite easily take over any starting PG position within a couple of months of being drafted into the NBA.

Why for the Suns? The Suns have to get a future replacement for Nash and Lawson is probably the most NBA ready PG in the draft. His defense is a nice balance with his offense and with the in between tempo the Suns finished with last season is a good fit.


Detroit Pistons = BJ Mullens
Worst Case Scenario = Kwame Brown
Best Case Scenario = Samuel Dalembert

Observations: A big body who is able to get up and down the court with pretty good mobility. Able to finish strong around the hoop with contact. Pretty good already with both hands. Decent shot blocker. Good hands above his head catching oops and finishing.
No refined post moves at all. Poor hands down low. No real range on his J. Needs to understand the game a lot more.

Likely outcome: Bench player. His size is an advantage, but his lack of basketball ability is a real concern.

Why for the Pistons? With Dice and Sheed coming to the end or gone there isn’t a lot of big men on the Pistons. BJ is the best of a bad bunch. They hope that he can reach his potential and provide some much needed size.


Chicago Bulls = Jrue Holiday
Worst Case Scenario = Delonte West
Best Case Scenario = Kirk Hinrich

Observations: A long combo guard with good instincts and understanding of the game. Can create space on the offensive end thanks to his great movement. Always seems to be in motion with or without the ball. Very athletic and able to rise up. Fantastic defender who is very aware of his own defensive assignment as well as providing help D.
Questions about his true position were not answered at UCLA. Doesn’t seem to have great range on his J. Too passive and not aggressive enough.

Likely outcome: Starter. Needs to truly prove that he can be a point guard in the NBA. If he can, he might have star potential. If not then he is just another combo.

Why the Bulls? Holiday provides them with a defensive stopper – just like Hinrich but for a fraction of the pric so it allows them to look to trade Hinrich. Holiday can play off the ball and next to Rose.


Philadelphia 76’ers = Jonny Flynn
Worst Case Scenario = Ronnie Price
Best Case Scenario = Nate Robinson

Observations: A super quick, super athletic PG. Pushes the ball really well and excels in the open floor. An improving shooter and an inspirational floor general who leads by example.
Can get ahead of himself at times trying to do too much or do things he might not be capable of. Needs to work on his decision making a little. Might be a little undersized both in height and span/reach (although being an outstanding athlete might make up for that).

Likely outcome: Role player. More likely a 2nd string PG/energy guy off the bench than a 35mpg starting PG. Ideally suited to an up tempo offense rather than a half court set type offense. Should be able to reach his best case scenario.

Why the 76’ers? With Miller more than likely gone, the Sixers grab a lightning quick PG who will run all day just like Iggy and Young as they look to become faster than the Suns of 3 years ago.


Minnesota Timberwolves = James Johnson
Worst Case Scenario = Al Harrington
Best Case Scenario = Danny Granger

Observations: A big strong guy with a lot of all around skills. Rebounds very well but is also able to create offense for others. Can play from the high post or get down deep in the post and go to work. Shoots the ball very well from all spots on the floor, especially from the mid range/in between area. Very athletic and quick for his size which will can cause match up problems.
No real star quality to him. Seems to be more comfortable in a complimentary role than being “the man”. For a guy of his size and with his tools, he doesn’t get to the line that often.

Likely outcome: Starter. Would be an excellent Robin to someone’s Batman. Still improving and the spacing in the NBA with more man to man play will really help highlight the way he can take advantage of opposing teams defenses.

Why the Timberwolves? With Brewer coming off a big injury the 3 spot is a little open in Minni. Either way, they lack depth at the spot and Johnson brings a well rounded game and some toughness to the roster.


Atlanta Hawks = Eric Maynor
Worst Case Scenario = Speedy Claxton
Best Case Scenario = Sam Cassell (prime)

Perfect size for an NBA PG. A smart player who can seem to do it all. Knows when to supply and knows when to take over. Can pick apart defenders using fakes and gets them on their back heels wondering what he might do next and can either find an open team mate, make the pull up J or go around them.
Probably about as good as he is going to get. Might need some time to adjust to the NBA from being a big fish to being a small fish.

Likely outcome: Role player. Could probably start and hold down the spot but teams are more likely going to want a starting PG with more upside.

Why the Hawks? They don’t want to lose any ground on how far they have come and want to continue to be a deep playoff team. They might lose Bibby so they bring in an NBA ready PG replacement at best and a fantastic back up at worse.


Utah Jazz = Jeff Teague
Worst Case Scenario = Antonio Daniels
Best Case Scenario = Monta Ellis

Observations: An explosive combo guard who can really rise above. Very, very quick and plays a lot taller than he is thanks to his ability to use his length. A passionate player who can play both back court positions. Has shown to have NBA range on his J.
Can go missing for very long stretches in a game. Body language can make him a little transparent at times.

Likely outcome: Role player. An explosive “score in bunches” type guy who could blossom to be a starter.

Why the Jazz? They need a back up PG in the worst way. When Williams went down last season they weren’t left with much else to back him up. Teague gives them a great 6th man who can back up the point and play next to Williams for some scoring punch if need be.


New Orleans Hornets = Chase Budinger
Worst Case Scenario = Rasual Butler
Best Case Scenario = JR Smith

Observations: A very smooth athlete with good size. Fairly good handles with the ability to pull up off his dribble for jump shots. Thanks to his fantastic athletic ability he is a factor on the boards.
Doesn’t really impose his will on the game and considering his athletic ability doesn’t really attack the rim as he should. Tends to be a little passive (unless his face gets stepped on!!). Fairly poor defender with limited lateral movement.

Likely outcome: Role player. Might be best suited as a career 6th man who still logs a lot of playing time. Likely to met his best case scenario.

Why the Hornets? They have a massive hole at the SG position and Chase is the best left on the board. Should be able to slide straight in and help carry some of the load that up until this point has been all on Paul and West.


Dallas Mavericks = Darren Collison
Worst Case Scenario = Brevin Knight
Best Case Scenario = Mario Chalmers

Observations: A mature, poised and confident true PG with fantastic length and big hands making him great on the defensive end. Good leaderl. Very efficient from the floor, from three and from the line. Plays at a good pace and has a good motor. Plays within himself with a quiet calmness and doesn’t try to do things he can not. Knows his limitations.
Quite thin and it would appear unable to add too much bulk. Doesn’t really command the attention of the opposing team.

Likely outcome: Role player. Probably best suited to play in a back up PG role giving stability and support to the 2nd unit of any team.

Why the Mavs? The future of Kidd in Dallas is unknown and even if he stays, he isn’t getting younger. Collison would provide a great back up for the time being and maybe even a replacement as starter. He provides a nice opposite option to Berea who is more offensive.


Sacramento Kings = Jeff Adrien
Worst Case Scenario = Jason Maxiell
Best Case Scenario = Ron Artest (poor mans)

Observations: A Bull of a player who uses his great strength and width to out muscle opposing players. A very strong rebounder thanks to his determination and powerful attack at the ball. A great glue guy who leads by example and never gives up. An emotional player who likes it down and dirty. Has a nice mid range J.
No offense flair to his game outside of put backs and shots in close. A little small to be a PF at the NBA level and a little two slow to be a SF. Might be stuck with that dreaded “tweener” tag.

Likely outcome: Bench player. Likely to be a short min impact type player who can come in and stir things up.

Why for the Kings? After going small with their 1st pick and addressing the PG need, the Kings go big with pick #2 – or as big as they can get. The Kings lack intensity and are labeled as being soft. Bringing in Adrien should address that with the way he bangs and plays all out.


Portland Trailblazers = Austin Daye
Worst Case Scenario = Channing Frye
Best Case Scenario = Rashard Lewis

Observations: A long SF with a knack for scoring in a variety of ways. Has great range on his jump shot and coupled with his height has a very high release point making it hard to block. Uses great head fakes and jab steps to get the defense out of their comfort zone and to create easier offensive opportunities for himself. Dreadfully skinny and looks unlikely to be able to add too much more weight. Not at all aggressive and finds it difficult to finish in traffic due to his frail frame.

Likely outcome: Bench player. His weight will always hold him back and the bigger SF/PF’s in the NBA will likely take him down on the block and make a meal out of him.

Why for the Blazers? With the injury to Webster and Frye open to free agency the Blazers look to add a big with great range on his J as an added spark to their 2nd unit. He brings a nice compliment to Oden of Pryzbilla.


Oklahoma City Thunder = Sam Young
Worst Case Scenario = Joey Graham
Best Case Scenario = Al Thornton

Observations: A long, athletic strong wing. Shows good patience and allows the game to come to him rather than forcing himself on the game. Good rebounder thanks to his understanding of positioning. Efficient player who rarely wastes possessions. A consistent and reliable performer.
Doesn’t have any real “star” quality and might have already maxed out his potential. While he is athletic and strong, he’s not overly quick.

Likely outcome: Role player. Likely a journeyman type player who might bounce around a little before finding his niche on a year in year out playoff type team where he can add depth from the bench.

Why The Thunder? A great role playing SF to back up Durant who will provide great bench production and stability in the 2nd until along with Thabo.


Chicago Bulls = Gani Lawal
Worst Case Scenario = Reggie Evans
Best Case Scenario = Emeka Okafor

A hard working PF who uses his strength and length to out position and out play his opposition. Great looking body that looks like it could easily add more muscle and not effect his speed. A good passer out of the double team. Good shot blocker.
A little mechanical at times and still trying to find his groove on the defensive end. A horrible FT shooter. Tends to reach a little and try to block everything which can result in picking up cheap fouls. Not good at putting the ball on the floor.

Likely outcome: Role player. If he can refine some of his technique and stay out of foul trouble, he could be a starter.

Why the Bulls? With Thomas said to be on his way out, the Bulls look to add a more offense based big who can compliment Noah. Lawal has a lot of upside and would suit the young and fast Bulls.


Memphis Grizzlies = Tyler Hansbrough
Worst Case Scenario = Mark Madsen
Best Case Scenario = Louis Scola

Observations: A passionate player who is blue collar and sure to be a fan favorite where ever he lands. A true lover of the game who is more than willing to do the gritty things to help his team get the win. Not a traditional basketball in the sense there is nothing flashy or finesse about him, but he gets the job done.
Is probably a little undersized to play the 4 in the NBA. No real refinement to his game. Might have already maxed out his potential. Probably a better college player that he’ll be an NBA player.

Likely outcome: Bench player. He’ll bring good energy and be best on a playoff team who needs some stability and grunt from the pine.

Why for the Grizzlies? They need a PF and Tyler gives them one that can step in and start from opening day. A tireless worker who has no problem in taking a back seat to the Mayo’s and Gay’s of the world who will provide the same sort of grunt as Gasol.


Minnesota Timberwolves = Wayne Ellington
Worst Case Scenario = Dequean Cook
Best Case Scenario = Kevin Martin

A great shooter who can score in bunches. Showed that he can shoot while moving more this season and is not just a spot up shooter. A fairly good handle allows him to out smart his defender by going up or going under and scoring in a variety of ways.
Looks for his own shot a little too much. A little undersized with both height and weight so he tends to get knocked around a little and avoids contact.

Likely outcome: Role player. Could add some bench scoring for any team and is able to log big mins on occasion if injury/foul problems require.

Why the Timberwolves? Adding an long range shooter from the bench will compliment what they already have – which is a lot of guys who can drive the lanes, and provide something different.


LA Lakers = Taj Gibson
Worst Case Scenario = Hilton Armstrong
Best Case Scenario = Drew Gooden

Observations: A very long PF with great rebounding and shot blocking ability. Not a super athlete but instead uses great timing and anticipation. Good hands allowing catches in the post. An improving post scorer who uses a nice little baby hook as his go to move. Great man to man defender using his quickness and length and equally as a help defender.
No real jump shot to speak of. Not a great FT shooter. Can pick up cheap fouls. Body is learn and looks like it wont fill out that much.

Likely outcome: Role player. The league is often looking for bigs who are mobile, can board and block shots so there is a place for Gibson as one of the 1st bigs off the bench.

Why for the Lakers? They get a local product who can continue to add depth to their big man dept.


Cleveland Cavilers = Dionte Christmas
Worst Case Scenario = Flip Murray
Best Case Scenario = Rip Hamilton (poor mans)

Observations: A heady player who stays calm and rarely panics. Being the only threat on the Owls meant he had to often face double and triple teams but rather than forcing through them he would often make the extra pass and find an open team mate. Great range on his J. Pretty solid handles and a passable defender. Works hard off the ball.
Not super athletic or explosive at all. Doesn’t really have a quick first step so his driving ability is some what limited. Not a very high ceiling.

Likely outcome: Bench player. Able to step into the NBA and likely be able to contribute from day #1. A nice shooter off anyone bench with great size and the ability to make a pass and get others involved.

Why for Cleveland? They get a heady bench player who can provide a spark, can add bench depth along with size and length at the wing and versatility on both ends.

[misterglover]

I like it Slam but I have to respectfully disagree... I think Terrence Williams will be a late first -2nd rd pick..definetly not lottery and call it a hunch but I just have this gut feeling...so much so I'd be willing to bet on it Larry Brown aint taking a SG...he just doesnt do what people thinks he should do or try to fill needs...see DJ Augustine last year...he evaluates players and which ever player he falls in love with he will pick regardless of position or what anyone thinks.... again just a gut feeling but I think if he's on the board the Bobcats are gonna take DeJuan Blair...he's that type of player LB seems to love to have on all his teams(ie Dale Davis, George Lynch, Corlis Williamson) I dont think LB really values wings that much unless they are "superstars" which none of the wings available at 12 will be we can always address that with one of our 2 second round picks or by trading both to move up late first rd/early 2nd or thru free agency or a bigger trade(I got a feeling Okafor may be on his way out especially if one of Radmanovic, Diop or Nazr contract goes with him)... Just dont think as 'Cats fans we should "assume" we will be taking a SG/SF type...