sp6r=underrated wrote:The current CBA is bad and this has nothing to do with the Knicks.
Historically, the NBA is most popular when the end of the playoffs features the same few teams meeting over and over again relative to high parity eras. Low parity eras turn off some fans who find a certain matchup boring. I found Warriors-Cavs a snore. But for everyone of us you lose you attract more casuals who prefer the repeat matchup with both teams bringing back the marquees players.
The current CBA encourages breaking up good teams and discourages elite players form pairing together. That's the opposite of what fans want.
Even worse the CBA's extreme penalties encourages tanking since having enough rookies on your roster ensures that you aren't at risk of the cap penalties.
The CBA blows.
I've mentioned this in other threads, I think they need to tweak the CBA to allow flexibility for players who are home grown or who have been on your roster for X amount of years and are trying to re-up.
It's so stupid that you could draft a core in very amazing fashion like Boston, Denver, OKC, etc, only to have to get screwed because you gotta pay crazy luxury taxes once the players you drafted are off their rookie deal.
I heard this new CBA was a reaction to KD joining GS but I feel like there is a better way to penalize an MVP joining an already overpowered team outside of penalizing all the GMs who draft well and build their teams responsibly from the ground up.