SportsGuru08 wrote:LeBron's defense was atrocious in the 2014 Finals. And his atrocious offense for most of 2013 if why they were in a 3-2 hole. No matter how you try to slice it, Ray Allen saved his legacy. Saved him from having a repeat of 2011 and a 1-3 Finals record with his superteam.
What are you basing this off of? I know you didn't watch the series so I'm very curious as to why you're so confident in that statement about a series you clearly didn't watch a single minute of.
SportsGuru08 wrote:The point about Wade was to address your excuse on how Bron didn't have him "at his best", namely that it's just a lame excuse. Again, he had Wade average 26 against a team of geriatric jump shooters and still found a way to lose. And even at "not his best" he was still better offensively better than Scottie was his last three Finals. And even if Wade wasn't his absolute best on defense, Miami still played good team defense and Bron is supposed to be this magical defender who can guard 1-5 and shut them all down. So where was that in the 2014 Finals?
It WAS there in the 2014 Finals. Not at that level, no. But he wasn't a horrible defender in the 2014 Finals by any means. I suggest you actually watch the games instead of going off opposing teams box scores and just automatically assuming "well, LeBron must have been awful on defense in that series". He wasn't.
Your point about Wade doesn't make any sense. First off, he wasn't better offensively than Scottie. Scottie didn't make his team worse offensively when he played on the floor like Wade did. Second, it's funny that you describe Wade as "not being at his best defensively" like you're trying to give him a subtle pass, but then claim LeBron was awful defensively in 2014. LeBron was significantly better on defense in the 2014 Finals than Wade was at that end in 2013, and 2014 for that matter. You not only aren't being consistent, you're showing clear bias and it's hurting what's already a very bad faith argument on your part.
SportsGuru08 wrote:That Spurs team had zero players average 17 PPG. Zero. Each of their big three was a dinosaur and the Finals MVP was a baby. And they lost by record margins. With literally any other player, this is a legacy killer. But LeBron gets a pass. He always does.
And yet they're one of the greatest teams of all time. So what is the point of mentioning that their big three were dinosaurs and that the Finals MVP was young? Clearly, none of that mattered because they still had a 8+ SRS, 62 wins and a 8+ net rating. Oh and btw, no one on the team averaged more than 30 MPG. That's a dominant team.
You're trying your best to downplay how great they were and it's showing why you can't be taken seriously. You can't ignore all other aspects of the game with "errr but they were old". They were an incredibly deep and stacked squad. Losing to an all time team isn't a legacy killer, it's idiotic to claim otherwise.
SportsGuru08 wrote:You were complaining on how I called Miami a superteam. I then correctly pointed out how you and your ilk have such a low criteria for what qualifies as a superteam and how Bron's Miami teams were superteams by your criteria. Don't be obtuse.
Go back and re-read what I said.
I was pointing out how idiotic it was to say that LeBron was playing on a "superteam" in the 2013 Finals, because the second best player on his team was playing hobbled. You're making a generalized statement while purposely ignoring an important fact. Not to mention, super teams are overrated.
SportsGuru08 wrote:I did watch those games in 2014; Kawhi torched LeBron. Just like Jason Terry did. And yes, Boris Diaw did clamp him whenever he guarded him in the '13 Finals, another reason why Allen's three was a legacy saver.
No, you didn't. I suggest you start actually watching these games before talking about them.
SportsGuru08 wrote:Well I've wasted enough brain cells talking to you.
Starting battles that you can't finish yet again. At least this time you didn't get yourself banned over it. You're making progress.