Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Better FIBA Player

Nikola Jokic
15
20%
Luka Doncic
60
80%
 
Total votes: 75

User avatar
LuDux1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,851
And1: 4,854
Joined: Mar 22, 2009

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#41 » by LuDux1 » Wed Sep 17, 2025 12:01 pm

LuDux1 wrote:Comparing teams across eras is impossible, unless..


I thought it's impossible to compare because of political changes. But what if we ignore such teams? Probably silly, but still
Spain 9 golds - 9 silvers - 6 bronzes
Czechoslovakia 9-5-3
Italy 7-8-6
Greece 5-4-4
Poland 3-3-2
Hungary 2-1-3
Bulgaria 2-0-6
Turkey 2-0-0
France 1-11-7
Egypt 1-1-0
Israel 1-0-1
Finland 0-0-1
Switzerland 0-0-1
Belgium 0-0-1
Netherlands 0-0-1

Eurobasket only
Technically Czechoslovakia shouldn't be here, but Slovakia is not strong and it's my rules anyway
User avatar
Calvin Klein
RealGM
Posts: 15,535
And1: 10,456
Joined: May 20, 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:
   

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#42 » by Calvin Klein » Wed Sep 17, 2025 12:11 pm

Let's just dismiss a whole team winning Eurobasket because "they got lucky".
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,464
And1: 3,001
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#43 » by Mirotic12 » Wed Sep 17, 2025 7:24 pm

LuDux1 wrote:
Mirotic12 wrote:
LuDux1 wrote:Spain is clearly the most decorated team in post-Era Of Empires basketball:
Gold-Silver-Bronze
4-3-3 Spain
3-2-1 Serbia+
1-3-1 Lithuania
1-2-2 France
1-1-2 Russia
1-1-1 Germany
1-1-1 Italy
1-0-1 Greece
1-0-0 Slovenia
0-1-0 Turkey
0-0-2 Croatia

Comparing teams across eras is impossible, unless..


Most of Serbia's claimed success was under FR Yugoslavia.

Serbia itself has not even won the EuroBasket.


Hence Serbia+


Yeah, but still, it really shouldn't be credited to Serbia at all.

Otherwise, why not give Russia all of the Soviet medals.
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,464
And1: 3,001
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#44 » by Mirotic12 » Wed Sep 17, 2025 7:25 pm

LuDux1 wrote:I thought it's impossible to compare because of political changes. But what if we ignore such teams? Probably silly, but still
Spain 9 golds - 9 silvers - 6 bronzes
Czechoslovakia 9-5-3
Italy 7-8-6
Greece 5-4-4
Poland 3-3-2
Hungary 2-1-3
Bulgaria 2-0-6
Turkey 2-0-0
France 1-11-7
Egypt 1-1-0
Israel 1-0-1
Finland 0-0-1
Switzerland 0-0-1
Belgium 0-0-1
Netherlands 0-0-1

Eurobasket only
Technically Czechoslovakia shouldn't be here, but Slovakia is not strong and it's my rules anyway


There is absolutely no possible way that Spain could have won that many medals.
User avatar
LuDux1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,851
And1: 4,854
Joined: Mar 22, 2009

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#45 » by LuDux1 » Thu Sep 18, 2025 6:40 am

Mirotic12 wrote:
LuDux1 wrote:I thought it's impossible to compare because of political changes. But what if we ignore such teams? Probably silly, but still
Spain 9 golds - 9 silvers - 6 bronzes
Czechoslovakia 9-5-3
Italy 7-8-6
Greece 5-4-4
Poland 3-3-2
Hungary 2-1-3
Bulgaria 2-0-6
Turkey 2-0-0
France 1-11-7
Egypt 1-1-0
Israel 1-0-1
Finland 0-0-1
Switzerland 0-0-1
Belgium 0-0-1
Netherlands 0-0-1

Eurobasket only
Technically Czechoslovakia shouldn't be here, but Slovakia is not strong and it's my rules anyway


There is absolutely no possible way that Spain could have won that many medals.


If you mean that my calculations wrong, then my answer is "could be", I didn't double-check them.
If you mean that being best non-Soviet/Yugoslavian/German NT doesn't mean they would have won theoretical final game against 2nd best non-S/Y/G NT, my answer is "true", it's just thought experiment
User avatar
LuDux1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,851
And1: 4,854
Joined: Mar 22, 2009

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#46 » by LuDux1 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 2:38 pm

Mirotic12 wrote:
LuDux1 wrote:
Mirotic12 wrote:
Most of Serbia's claimed success was under FR Yugoslavia.

Serbia itself has not even won the EuroBasket.


Hence Serbia+


Yeah, but still, it really shouldn't be credited to Serbia at all.

Otherwise, why not give Russia all of the Soviet medals.


They kept the trophies already, don't they?

According to my calculations, in 6 Eurobaskets 1995-2003, Serbs contributes 89% of points, Montenegrins 10 and a Macedonian 1%

Yugoslavia 1961(when they started winning medals)-1991
Serbia 49%
Croatia 36%
Slovenia 8%
Montenegro 3%
Bosnia&Herzogovina 4%
Macedonia >1%

Soviet Union 1947-1989:
Russia 44%
Lithuania 18%
Ukraine 11%
Latvia 9%
Estonia 7%
Georgia 7%
Kazakhstan 2%
Belarus 1%
Armenia 1%
Azerbaijan >1%
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,464
And1: 3,001
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Better FIBA Player: Jokic vs Luka 

Post#47 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 3:12 pm

LuDux1 wrote:
Mirotic12 wrote:
LuDux1 wrote:
Hence Serbia+


Yeah, but still, it really shouldn't be credited to Serbia at all.

Otherwise, why not give Russia all of the Soviet medals.


They kept the trophies already, don't they?

According to my calculations, in 6 Eurobaskets 1995-2003, Serbs contributes 89% of points, Montenegrins 10 and a Macedonian 1%

Yugoslavia 1961(when they started winning medals)-1991
Serbia 49%
Croatia 36%
Slovenia 8%
Montenegro 3%
Bosnia&Herzogovina 4%
Macedonia >1%

Soviet Union 1947-1989:
Russia 44%
Lithuania 18%
Ukraine 11%
Latvia 9%
Estonia 7%
Georgia 7%
Kazakhstan 2%
Belarus 1%
Armenia 1%
Azerbaijan >1%


Which is why FIBA counts all the medals separately.

Return to The General Board