nate33 wrote:Yes. Your offense is dead in the water unless it has one guy who can score efficiently against single coverage. You need a guy who can force teams to help and get into rotation. And in an era where fronting the post is now possible (thanks to zone defense rules allowing weakside help on off-ball players) you can't expect a post player to consistently get enough touches to regularly bend the defense from the low block. It has to be a ball handler.
This.
Denver suffers from this constantly because Murray is only a shooter who can operate out of DHOs and such sets, but can't actually get by people on his own.
Meantime, historically, there aren't that many guys who could author an offense strong enough to be truly competitive. And most of them still needed a star guard to get it done, and the ones who didn't have it didn't realize that ultimate goal. Or they had more game than just action from the low block, and had mobility and shooting ability more in line with a guard/forward, and a year or two of very strong supporting cast come the playoffs.
The requirements on a big to be that guy grow pretty significantly, right? So you need size, you need FT shooting touch, you need range, you need passing ability, you need to be able to read and react at the top of the circle and all that DHO fun-time stuff... AND they like you to have some post game and off-ball sense and screening and all that. It's rough, and that's before people start talking about defense.
Guards just have more mobility, more freedom and ease in ranging around the court to probe, especially if they combine athleticism and shooting. And then yeah, there's no illegal D letting you clear out a side for a post isolation as often as in the 90s, for example. You still get it happening at times, and your conventional off-ball action into the post for a quick move on the catch is still very viable, but that's harder to set up than a guard putzing around ATB.