dhsilv2 wrote:Domejandro wrote:taikibansei wrote:
Randle will never be known as a defensive stopper. However, we had worse defensive personnel surrounding Randle most of the time he was on the Knicks but never got as bad as 142.2. That's G-league level. I'm a bit stunned that it's four years after the Gobert acquisition and yet the Twolves still don't have a better answer for when he sits. The Twolves are still a very good team--don't get me wrong--but I feel they should be even better.
Naz Reid is
one of the worst defensive players in the NBA and cannot rebound, so every minute he shares with Julius Randle is a disaster.
Not that he's some defensive stand out. But most metrics look perfectly average on him. My spotty eye test on him as generally been good energy and good activity while not being a rim protector or rebounder. Where am I and RAPM type metrics so far off?
Also...I've always wanted to be a Randle fan but he's always come off as a terrible defender due to his limitations and focus.
Naz’s numbers with Gobert last year were great
Randle’s numbers with Gobert last year were good
Naz’s numbers with Randle were horrific, and even worse this year. Naz is not a center.
I know Gobert erases a lot of mistakes, but the Rudy-Naz numbers wouldn’t be great if he was “worst in the league.”
But yeah, not good defensively and poor rebounder. Great scorer with size though