
Bonus Question: AND WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP?
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

puny wrote:Why omit the obvious choice?
Oh, I get it. Because you're a troll. News at 11.
WillyJakkz wrote:puny wrote:Why omit the obvious choice?
Oh, I get it. Because you're a troll. News at 11.
What are you jabbering about? You sound like a maniac.
lambchop wrote:WillyJakkz wrote:puny wrote:Why omit the obvious choice?
Oh, I get it. Because you're a troll. News at 11.
What are you jabbering about? You sound like a maniac.
Seriously though, what about beating both records and winning the title? I'm not even an OKC fan, but you should include that option so we can see how confident people are about OKC winning it all in historic fashion.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.

JN61 wrote:I want to remind everyone that warriors team had the biggest meltdown ever in NBA finals history. So I hope OKC is nothing like that.

TheCage4 wrote:The Warriors "meltdown" was the NBA protecting MJ's legacy while adding to LeBron's. The only way I can see OKC not beating at least one of the records and repeating is because the league believes it's bad for the narrative.

lambchop wrote:WillyJakkz wrote:puny wrote:Why omit the obvious choice?
Oh, I get it. Because you're a troll. News at 11.
What are you jabbering about? You sound like a maniac.
Seriously though, what about beating both records and winning the title? I'm not even an OKC fan, but you should include that option so we can see how confident people are about OKC winning it all in historic fashion.