Lottery in the 2007-08 NBA
Contender if they were all in their primes
Can this team win it all? Or how far can it go?
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro
-
ToffKobe
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,232
- And1: 2
- Joined: Mar 27, 2006
Welcome to the lottery. They'd IMO have one of the worst records in the league.
Consider this, who will be your main scorer on that team!? The best natural scorer would be Grant Hill most likely but you can't expect him to be your go to guy or your team is in trouble.
They'd also get abused on the glass, not to mention they don't exactly have world class defenders. I would expect them to give up TONS of points to opposing teams and struggle to score points themselves.
Consider this, who will be your main scorer on that team!? The best natural scorer would be Grant Hill most likely but you can't expect him to be your go to guy or your team is in trouble.
They'd also get abused on the glass, not to mention they don't exactly have world class defenders. I would expect them to give up TONS of points to opposing teams and struggle to score points themselves.
-
ToffKobe
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,232
- And1: 2
- Joined: Mar 27, 2006
ljp24 wrote:Where's Iverson? He doesn't have a ring.hey'd also get abused on the glass, not to mention they don't exactly have world class defenders. I would expect them to give up TONS of points to opposing teams and struggle to score points themselves.
Jason Kidd
So Kidd will singlehandedly be the reason they wouldn't be abused on the glass, and the team would be a defensive juggernaut, and score lots of points. The Nets are struggling right now with the trio of Kidd, Carter, Jefferson despite Kidd's triple double numbers. I highly doubt he'll be a difference maker with the proposed lineup. Please think logically or at least back up what you say with something useful instead of providing one liners.