If the playoffs started today, would all WC underdogs win?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, infinite11285, Dirk, Harry Garris, ken6199, zimpy27, bwgood77, bisme37, KingDavid, Domejandro

Cassius
RealGM
Posts: 15,531
And1: 4,081
Joined: Aug 19, 2005
Location: We won.
     

If the playoffs started today, would all WC underdogs win? 

Post#1 » by Cassius » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:36 pm

1 Phoenix vs. 8 G State
2 NOH vs. 7 Denver
3 Dallas vs. 6 San Antonio
4 Portland vs. 5 LA Lakers

The Lakers sans Bynum would still be favoured in my opinion, with him, I don't think it's close against the Blazers.

Anyone else see any of these series going less than six games?
I_Like_Dirt wrote:The whole comparison to Kevin McHale is ridiculously close, imo... And that's without more hilarious aspects of the comparison, e.g. if Wally Sczerbiak were 7 feet tall with the slower reflexes that came with the additional height, he'd be Bargnani.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,345
And1: 23,165
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#2 » by dockingsched » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:39 pm

lakers wouldn't be an underdog. they'd have homecourt advantage. right now without bynum, the underdog blazers take it.

i think the hornets would destroy the nuggets. i don't think the warriors would win, but they'd would make it interesting.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
black06eclipse
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2005

 

Post#3 » by black06eclipse » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:48 pm

NO/DEN would be a great series.

i think the Nuggets blew a late 4th quarter lead in their 1st meeting, and then Denver won in the 2nd meeting.

it would go 6 or 7 games.
Cassius
RealGM
Posts: 15,531
And1: 4,081
Joined: Aug 19, 2005
Location: We won.
     

 

Post#4 » by Cassius » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:24 pm

Camby and Chandler are near clones on the defensive end. It would be interesting to see them battle each other down low.

Melo and KMart vs. Peja and DWest would be pretty interesting going back and forth, too.
I_Like_Dirt wrote:The whole comparison to Kevin McHale is ridiculously close, imo... And that's without more hilarious aspects of the comparison, e.g. if Wally Sczerbiak were 7 feet tall with the slower reflexes that came with the additional height, he'd be Bargnani.
User avatar
KB20
Head Coach
Posts: 6,191
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 27, 2004
       

 

Post#5 » by KB20 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:29 pm

Cassius wrote:Camby and Chandler are near clones on the defensive end. It would be interesting to see them battle each other down low.

Melo and KMart vs. Peja and DWest would be pretty interesting going back and forth, too.


And CP vs. AI. That would be an awsome series.
Image
Mr. Perfect
Analyst
Posts: 3,247
And1: 1,362
Joined: Mar 27, 2007
 

 

Post#6 » by Mr. Perfect » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:32 pm

I'd say the Mavs would beat the Spurs.
User avatar
Milkdud
RealGM
Posts: 12,095
And1: 137
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Dreaming of Australia

 

Post#7 » by Milkdud » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:47 pm

:rofl: If only my blazers could face the Lakers without Bynum.
User avatar
Wizards2Lottery
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: All aboard the TANK

 

Post#8 » by Wizards2Lottery » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:31 pm

Those matchups are so much better than the current EC matchups:

Boston vs. Atlanta
Detroit vs. New Jersey
Orlando vs. Cleveland
Washington vs. Toronto

Those might as well end up being the matches. Except I see the Wizads overtaking Orlando for the division lead and playing Cleveland once again in the playoffs.
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#9 » by crzy » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:52 pm

I pray for a Phoenix - Golden State matchup. :pray:

It would be the most entertaining first round series ever.
Image
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#10 » by deeney0 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:58 pm

The way the Spurs have been playing, I'll take the Mavs in 4 or 5.
User avatar
britblazerdude
RealGM
Posts: 11,649
And1: 1,344
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: Nuevo México
       

 

Post#11 » by britblazerdude » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:59 pm

For starters, you didn't even get the matchups right.
To Dare Is To Do? 13 League Titles. You've only got 2.
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#12 » by HarlemHeat37 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:16 pm

if the Spurs don't improve, they'll get beat by whoever they play..but thankfully, this isn't the actual Spurs team that will come out in the playoffs..same as last year..Parker is playing noticeably hurt..we were 17-3 before the injuries..

with that being said, I wouldn't mind playing those loveable chokers..
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Re: If the playoffs started today, would all WC underdogs wi 

Post#13 » by joe.linnen » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:46 pm

Cassius wrote:1 Phoenix vs. 8 G State
2 NOH vs. 7 Denver
3 Dallas vs. 6 San Antonio
4 Portland vs. 5 LA Lakers

The Lakers sans Bynum would still be favoured in my opinion, with him, I don't think it's close against the Blazers.

Anyone else see any of these series going less than six games?


It should be the Lakers vs. the Spurs and the TrailBlazers vs. the Mavericks

The Spurs are one team that I would like to see in the Western Conference Finals.

Warriors in 6
Hornets in 7
Lakers in 7
TrailBlazers in 6
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 94,336
And1: 24,927
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#14 » by hermes » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:05 am

man i'd take the spurs as an underdog all day
The_Believer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: The Bay

 

Post#15 » by The_Believer » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:08 am

GS has the highest chance of upsetting their favorites, and if the spurs were an "underdog," they would probably win.
DDansby123
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,808
And1: 1
Joined: May 22, 2002

 

Post#16 » by DDansby123 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:20 am

HarlemHeat37 wrote:with that being said, I wouldn't mind playing those loveable chokers..


While admitting that the Mavs have choked in the playoffs and that the Spurs may very well be the better team overall, I still find your confidence and attitude re: Dallas fairly odd given the more recent Mavs-Spurs history. The Mavs are the only team to beat the Spurs in the playoffs the past three seasons, and it's always a close game when these teams play in the regular season. I can understand supreme confidence from a Warrior fan, but a Spurs fan? Doesn't make sense to me.

Return to The General Board