Is Emeka Okafor a bust?
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 973
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 24, 2006
- TMACPIERCEMARION
- Junior
- Posts: 473
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
legacyinthemakin89c wrote:You insult him for not making the playoffs? He started the league as the franchise player for a brand new team, give the kid a break, Dwight wouldn't have been able to put the Bobcats in the playoffs either.
I'm going to have to argue that point, Dwight Howard with the players around him would've made the playoffs, the East is weak and Charlotte has capable enough players to make the playoffs, I honestly think they are under-achieving, Dwight Howard would have put them at close to a .500 record, that you can almost be sure of and would've easily good enough for a playoff birth. And for the guy that said Okafor needs a capable PG, they have one, Felton is 16ppg and 7apg, definitely good numbers from the PG position, Okafor is a good decent big man in the NBA, I would've taken both Iggy and Smith over him in the draft, but I don't know if I'd make him into a bust just yet, he's got a couple more years.

Re: Is Emeka Okafor a bust?
- etopn23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,072
- And1: 160
- Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Re: Is Emeka Okafor a bust?
What are you talking about? Do you not remember him being on the cover of ESPN? They ran more stories about him than anyone else in the draft. People were expecting him and Dwight Howard to be the next gen HoF bigs.Hunter wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Your recollection of how Okafor came into the league is far different than mine. I don't recall this "hype" you are speaking of and I certainly don't remember people expecting him to develop into a "monster in the post". Quite the contrary in fact - he came into the league as the more NBA ready player, but with less upside. Most people projected him as a defensive force with a good, but limited offensive game. Which is more or less what he's been when healthy.
Okafor was more of the "sure thing", but Dwight always had the potential of being the much bigger star. He might not be quite as good as what people thought, but far from a bust.
Look at these Draft Projections:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft/d05 ... erId=18626
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketba ... rwards.htm
http://www.collegehoopsnet.com/Draft/STATS2004.htm
You're correct in saying he was expected to come in as a dominant defender/rebounder but a raw player on the offensive end... but no one expected him to develop so little offensively. He was projected as an Alonzo Mourning, not just a solid defensive big.
- etopn23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,072
- And1: 160
- Joined: Feb 05, 2006
:lol: Yeah, a 21 year old big man was at his peak coming into the league. Would you say Dwight Howard is at his peak now? I'm not saying he has to be a HOWARD, I don't know why everyone is throwing in a Howard reference when I only mentioned him once. The guy isn't even a big they can build around, no one projected that.CircleCitysportsfan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's Charlotte's (or your) fault for having unrealistic expectations. He pretty much peaked at UConn, he wasn't a teenager like Dwight so he was not going to improve that much. He was at his ceiling already. It was unrealistic to think he was going to improve at the rate Howard was. I can't name one team in the NBA who would not take 13 and 11 and 2 in the paint. Orlando knew Okafor was pretty much the player he was going to be, that's why they picked Howard.
I can name alot of teams that wouldn't take that for the #2 pick in hindsight. 13/11/2 is David Lee with better interior D. Okafor is a solid player, but he hasn't panned out as expected.
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,978
- And1: 19,801
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Wow, its nothing like David Lee, Okafor can anchor an elite defense RIGHT NOW, and still do the job on his own man.
He's getting these points in horrible fashion, tsherkin will show up and school you fellas on how he is underutilized, I don't have the time, or the paragraph skills to do so.
He's getting these points in horrible fashion, tsherkin will show up and school you fellas on how he is underutilized, I don't have the time, or the paragraph skills to do so.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 91,176
- And1: 30,865
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Okafor isn't a bust... he's a meaningful contributor, a starting caliber center who can exert significant impact on defense.
He's underutilized on O and that kills him but he's also just not naturally a scorer; he had to work exceptionally hard to learn how to score; he doesn't have a jumper, or any kind of dominant athletic traits, nor is he physically imposing in terms of size, so he has no go-to attribute around which to build his offensive game.
He could easily be a 15-17 ppg scorer if the Bobcats looked to him more regularly, though, I don't think there's any question of that, and if he was posting 16/10, I don't think too many people would be interested in calling him a bust.
He's not a bust, he's just not everything you'd hope for from a top-2 pick.
He's underutilized on O and that kills him but he's also just not naturally a scorer; he had to work exceptionally hard to learn how to score; he doesn't have a jumper, or any kind of dominant athletic traits, nor is he physically imposing in terms of size, so he has no go-to attribute around which to build his offensive game.
He could easily be a 15-17 ppg scorer if the Bobcats looked to him more regularly, though, I don't think there's any question of that, and if he was posting 16/10, I don't think too many people would be interested in calling him a bust.
He's not a bust, he's just not everything you'd hope for from a top-2 pick.
Re: Is Emeka Okafor a bust?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,970
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Re: Is Emeka Okafor a bust?
That's not really fair. What you're talking about are "max" potential and upside, which is only one half of the analysis. Those projections are saying "IF he completely maximizes his ability this is the best possible scenario". That is NOT the same thing as saying "this is what he will be". That's why they also provide a downside. USA Today for example listed both Alonzo Mouring AND Stacey King. You can't mention Zo and pretend like that is all there was to it. Lets be real here, few people actually came out going "zomg, he's the next Zo!"etopn23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
What are you talking about? Do you not remember him being on the cover of ESPN? They ran more stories about him than anyone else in the draft. People were expecting him and Dwight Howard to be the next gen HoF bigs.
Look at these Draft Projections:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft/d05 ... erId=18626
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketba ... rwards.htm
http://www.collegehoopsnet.com/Draft/STATS2004.htm
You're correct in saying he was expected to come in as a dominant defender/rebounder but a raw player on the offensive end... but no one expected him to develop so little offensively. He was projected as an Alonzo Mourning, not just a solid defensive big.
Collegehoopsnet isn't that far off either. They projected him as a 16 & 9 player in his 2nd year when in fact he was 13 & 10, but he was injured most of the year only playing 25 games. He put up 15 & 11 and 14 & 11 his 1st and 3rd years in the league which is right on pace w/ his projection. Then they listed his "max potential" as 18 & 10, but it's way to early to say Okafor will not get close to that. He could very well develop into a consistent 16-18 ppg scorer as more of a focal point offensively.
Frankly your characterization of those projections is one sided and flawed. They supported my position more so than yours.
JES12 wrote:Bass just barley turned 23 and is a starting PF on any team without a 8 time all-NBA PF in front of him!
- WadeKnicks2010
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,871
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 14, 2008
- Location: NYC
lol why is he a bust? Howard is better and he was picked before him. Okafor was the second best player in the draft and guess what? He was picked second. And he's a very good player on both ends. He's a legitimate big man. He is tough, he mans his ground and holds down his position and will get you the boards and blocks you need to win in the NBA. Any championship caliber team would love to have him. No one thought he was going to be Shaquille O'Neal. He's performing just about the way we all thought he would.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,864
- And1: 176
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
- Contact:
-
he sucks on offense
i think he still has time to improve, but imo bobcats need to focus on him more, maybe get him a BIGMAN Mentor to teach him like patrick ewing with d12, or keem' wit yao....
i think he still has time to improve, but imo bobcats need to focus on him more, maybe get him a BIGMAN Mentor to teach him like patrick ewing with d12, or keem' wit yao....
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY