In order to be elite you need 40 wins before 20 losses

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Phil Jackson says: in order to be considered Elite you need 40 wins before 20 losses? Do you agree or disagree?

I agree
21
50%
I disagree
21
50%
 
Total votes: 42

User avatar
LakersSquad
Analyst
Posts: 3,152
And1: 132
Joined: Jun 07, 2005

 

Post#21 » by LakersSquad » Tue Mar 4, 2008 5:44 am

Bigmagicfan82 wrote:
dcash4 wrote:i know miami was mentioned but other than that anyone know the number of champions in the last 10-15 years that indeed reached 40 before 20?


Championships from 2000- 2007

2000 Lakers

40-11


2001 Lakers

40-19


2002 Lakers

40-17


2003 Spurs

40-17

2004 Pistons

36-20


2005 Spurs

40-11

2006 Heat

30-20


2007 Spurs

40-18


what this list shows is anything can happen in the east.
User avatar
sarah42
Starter
Posts: 2,094
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 10, 2007
Location: In bed with Jake Ryan. woot woot!

 

Post#22 » by sarah42 » Tue Mar 4, 2008 6:02 am

Buckeye-NBAFan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



And air could be water. Now please give us an example as it relates to the NBA. Which teams have done that?

Anyway, people make such a big deal out of these quotes. They get dozens of questions a day from the media. This quote was taken out of context. It's not a rule of thumb. It probably related specifically to the Lakers at that time, and Phil was just saying his team was for real. And they were. They won 3 in a row.


i think maybe houston this year. maybe they did that. they are on a 15 or 16 game win streak and lost their starting star center.

i think houston is elite, btw. for now anyways. they still have a lot to do while yao is hurt. frankly, most team probably would rather face the nuggets than houston with how great they are currently playing. such a shame for their fans.
Image
inmate347 wrote:
BTW, I still maintain that the 1984 Denver Broncos are Lebron's father
GilArenas88
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,767
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 02, 2004
Location: VA

 

Post#23 » by GilArenas88 » Tue Mar 4, 2008 7:04 am

Well when your speaking about the 2004 Pistons you have to remember they got Rasheed Wallace early mid season if I remember right. But like another one posted I think its a pretty good rule to go by, but their are exceptions to rules...
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#24 » by mudyez » Tue Mar 4, 2008 10:23 am

made me wonder if the spurs usualy do that, as they always have these late season surges!

so my answer has to be: no, not really! ...but most of them do so and I had to agree if you said "twice as much wins as losses afte 82games!"...coz thats what I'm looking for all the season!
Image
KobeFarmarEra
Pro Prospect
Posts: 973
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 24, 2006

 

Post#25 » by KobeFarmarEra » Tue Mar 4, 2008 10:50 am

RUSSIAN LIGHTNING wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



^ It's obviously a good indicator, but definitely not the only one. Considering the last two championship teams from the east didn't manage to reach 40 before 20, I'd say it's not %100 accurate.


And coincidentally, both those finals were complete and utter fix jobs. The post-Donaghy era should be different though. Hopefully.
tyguy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 980
And1: 660
Joined: Nov 08, 2003

 

Post#26 » by tyguy » Tue Mar 4, 2008 11:01 am

KobeFarmarEra wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



And coincidentally, both those finals were complete and utter fix jobs. The post-Donaghy era should be different though. Hopefully.
Nice sly jab at Lebron.

Return to The General Board