^^^
Speaking of Amare, the new R2MVP guy says that Amare is the fifth best MVP candidate. He must only see his dunks and power blocks. That's the only logical explanation I could think of for justifying his absurdly high rank.
Has an MVP ever not been an All-Star?
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 10,714
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 06, 2007
- Location: Chaine Wasatch, Occident des Etats-Unis
Tabasco wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Anyone who watches the team regularly will disagree with that. Williams is much more valuable to the Jazz. And a better player.
I think we have made polls in two major Jazz fan bases, and we have found out that 4:1 ratio of people voting Williams:Boozer.
Believe it or not, without Boozer the Utah Jazz are just as good or probably even better. Since Williams arrival, without Williams, historically the Jazz have never won a game. When he is out of the game. Williams simply runs the best oiled offensive machine in the NBA (sorry nashy).
Williams deserves to be 6th I think. I think as well that Paul Pierce is a points scarce team has proven to be the true MVP, but the hype will go to rebounds-less Garnett.