For many, the definition of a franchise player is simply the best player on any franchise. So in that respect every team has a franchise player, but few have a superstar.
Additionally, I suppose, it would be possible to have 2 superstars, but not really possible to have 2 franchise players.
I'd put true superstar above franchise player in terms of how the words are used.
Franchise Player or Superstar, which has more value?
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
-
Harry Palmer
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 42,866
- And1: 6,366
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
- Location: It’s all a bit vague.