A.J. wrote:6'10 or 6'8, Beasley is still going to be a force in the NBA.
Folks, we just had a Tim McCarver sighting
Beasley only 6 foot 8! with shoes!
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
-
Pats19andO
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,721
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 19, 2007
- Location: Mr.Ferguson, meet Donovan. Donovan, Robert's neck.
-
TheKingOfVa360
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,326
- And1: 1,663
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Orange County, California
-
-
kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
cool007 wrote:All I want to say is (even thought I HATE to compare but) Beasley is the 2nd coming of Barkley - yeah the name rhymes too.
and whoever said Beasley is suited to play SF, don't know his game at all.
He is every bit of LEGIT PF in today's NBA game as other Star PFs in the game today.
I think he will have BIG BIG time career. Whatever his height is, he STILL dominated entire NCAA College Basketball as a FRESHMAN - I repeat FRESHMAN. The guy is outstandingly talented and he will be a great PF for many many years.
/thread.
first of all, those names don't rhyme.
who else dominated in college? JJ Redick. If he is 6'6, I bet he gets more minutes and a diff role.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.
Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
-
kkhdragon15
- Ballboy
- Posts: 9
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 07, 2006
- Location: Davis, California