Is Iggy a Hall of Famer

[java051997]

Not a warrior fan but c'mon he is a HOF no doubt.
I think he is one of the greatest role player of all time.

He's not a regular season type of guy but when playoffs time , he can give you everything.

Look at his resume as well.
1x finals mvp , multiple allstars and possibly could win upto 5 rings atleast .
Thats a huge accomplishments.
Plus he's a part of one of the greatest super lineups , the Hampton 5.

[Galloisdaman]

Based on the precendent of Dennis Johnson Silk and especially the 60's Celtics he should be no doubt.

DJ being in the HOF is kind of a reach. Another guy who took around 20 years to get in. With that said DJ was a better player.

[kenwood3333]

if he gets in then it opens up the argument for letting other role players such as robert horry and john salley to get in since they both have 7 rings

[Galloisdaman]

Not a warrior fan but c'mon he is a HOF no doubt.
I think he is one of the greatest role player of all time.

He's not a regular season type of guy but when playoffs time , he can give you everything.

Look at his resume as well.
1x finals mvp , multiple allstars and possibly could win upto 5 rings atleast .
Thats a huge accomplishments.
Plus he's a part of one of the greatest super lineups , the Hampton 5.

1 time all star is multiple all star? He averaged around 12 ppg in his "all star" season.

[java051997]

Not a warrior fan but c'mon he is a HOF no doubt.
I think he is one of the greatest role player of all time.

He's not a regular season type of guy but when playoffs time , he can give you everything.

Look at his resume as well.
1x finals mvp , multiple allstars and possibly could win upto 5 rings atleast .
Thats a huge accomplishments.
Plus he's a part of one of the greatest super lineups , the Hampton 5.

1 time all star is multiple all star? He averaged around 12 ppg in his "all star" season.

alright brother, i made a mistake . I thought he had other selection because he was really solid on his sixers jersey . Anyway , it doesnt chance the fact that he is a beast when important things are in the table

[Galloisdaman]

Not a warrior fan but c'mon he is a HOF no doubt.
I think he is one of the greatest role player of all time.

He's not a regular season type of guy but when playoffs time , he can give you everything.

Look at his resume as well.
1x finals mvp , multiple allstars and possibly could win upto 5 rings atleast .
Thats a huge accomplishments.
Plus he's a part of one of the greatest super lineups , the Hampton 5.

1 time all star is multiple all star? He averaged around 12 ppg in his "all star" season.

alright brother, i made a mistake . I thought he had other selection because he was really solid on his sixers jersey . Anyway , it doesnt chance the fact that he is a beast when important things are in the table

Mistakes happen so no problem. I think Iggy being a HOF or a beast is also a mistake though.

In 6 seasons as a Warrior he has averaged 9.4 ppg while shooting a not very beastly 53% from the free throw line in the playoffs.

Where was the hall of fame beast before Curry, Klay, Green, Durant, etc?

[Phanboi]

Of course he is a Hall of famer, anyone who doesn't think Andre deserves to be in the HOF has not watched him.

[Slim Charlez]

If bums like Pierce are going to eventually end up there, I don't see any reason why Iggy shouldn't make it. The standards are quite low for Basketball HoF compared to other major sports.

Pp was waaaay better than Iggy. Iggy is in the horry tier of good players who contributed greatly to championship teams but no way should they be anywhere near the HOF.

[Soulyss]

He seems highly unlikely to make it... a good role player for a long time.

[Anticon]

Based on the precendent of Dennis Johnson Silk and especially the 60's Celtics he should be no doubt.

DJ being in the HOF is kind of a reach. Another guy who took around 20 years to get in. With that said DJ was a better player.

but this kind of argument shows that people are mostly arguing about their own standards of what is a hall of fame player, not who will actually get in.

it doesn't matter if Iggy is a reach, the question is whether the basketball hall of fame will induct him? And my guess is all 4 of the original Warriors that drove that 73 win team will make it.

[SFrush]

He'll get in.

[Galloisdaman]

Based on the precendent of Dennis Johnson Silk and especially the 60's Celtics he should be no doubt.

DJ being in the HOF is kind of a reach. Another guy who took around 20 years to get in. With that said DJ was a better player.

but this kind of argument shows that people are mostly arguing about their own standards of what is a hall of fame player, not who will actually get in.

it doesn't matter if Iggy is a reach, the question is whether the basketball hall of fame will induct him? And my guess is all 4 of the original Warriors that drove that 73 win team will make it.

I doubt it. Did 4 of the Bulls 72 wins starters get in? Iggy is a solid player but he was much more of a passenger than the driving force for those 73 wins. Actually your argument has a significant flaw. Iggy started 1 game all season on that 73 win team. Might as well say Harrison Barnes who started all season and played more minutes per game deserves the HOF if going by that standard.

[Anticon]

DJ being in the HOF is kind of a reach. Another guy who took around 20 years to get in. With that said DJ was a better player.

but this kind of argument shows that people are mostly arguing about their own standards of what is a hall of fame player, not who will actually get in.

it doesn't matter if Iggy is a reach, the question is whether the basketball hall of fame will induct him? And my guess is all 4 of the original Warriors that drove that 73 win team will make it.

I doubt it. Did 4 of the Bulls 72 wins starters get in? Iggy is a solid player but he was much more of a passenger than the driving force for those 73 wins. Actually your argument has a significant flaw. Iggy started 1 game all season on that 73 win team. Might as well say Harrison Barnes who started all season and played more minutes per game deserves the HOF if going by that standard.

I mean, if you think Iguodala and Harrison Barnes had the same impact on the Warriors I'm not sure what to tell you. And Pippen, Jordan and Rodman from the 96 Bulls are all in the Hall so...

And again, no one here is articulating the actual criteria the Hall of Fame will use. People are substituting their own standards.

[Wolfgang630]

Nope. He’s a great role player, but he sure as heck ain’t no hall of famer

[Galloisdaman]

but this kind of argument shows that people are mostly arguing about their own standards of what is a hall of fame player, not who will actually get in.

it doesn't matter if Iggy is a reach, the question is whether the basketball hall of fame will induct him? And my guess is all 4 of the original Warriors that drove that 73 win team will make it.

I doubt it. Did 4 of the Bulls 72 wins starters get in? Iggy is a solid player but he was much more of a passenger than the driving force for those 73 wins. Actually your argument has a significant flaw. Iggy started 1 game all season on that 73 win team. Might as well say Harrison Barnes who started all season and played more minutes per game deserves the HOF if going by that standard.

I mean, if you think Iguodala and Harrison Barnes had the same impact on the Warriors I'm not sure what to tell you. And Pippen, Jordan and Rodman from the 96 Bulls are all in the Hall so...

And again, no one here is articulating the actual criteria the Hall of Fame will use. People are substituting their own standards.

Jordan, Pippen and Rodman are 3 players not 4 players as you said in your post. They are 3 starters from their 72 win season not a backup. They are 3 guys that would have been in the Hall with or without winning 72 games in a season. Your argument is full of holes.

Actually Steve Kerr must have viewed Barnes contribution higher than you since Barnes was a starter and played more minutes per game than Iggy. Neither one is a HOF player. I was just showing how thin your argument for being in the HOF based on being on a 73 win team was IMO.

Ron Harper was a starter on the Bulls 72 win team. He is not in the HOF and he was probably a better player than Iggy before he blew out his knee.

[oaktownwarriors87]

GOAT defensive player

[oaktownwarriors87]

I doubt it. Did 4 of the Bulls 72 wins starters get in? Iggy is a solid player but he was much more of a passenger than the driving force for those 73 wins. Actually your argument has a significant flaw. Iggy started 1 game all season on that 73 win team. Might as well say Harrison Barnes who started all season and played more minutes per game deserves the HOF if going by that standard.

I mean, if you think Iguodala and Harrison Barnes had the same impact on the Warriors I'm not sure what to tell you. And Pippen, Jordan and Rodman from the 96 Bulls are all in the Hall so...

And again, no one here is articulating the actual criteria the Hall of Fame will use. People are substituting their own standards.

Jordan, Pippen and Rodman are 3 players not 4 players as you said in your post. They are 3 starters from their 72 win season not a backup. They are 3 guys that would have been in the Hall with or without winning 72 games in a season. Your argument is full of holes.

Actually Steve Kerr must have viewed Barnes contribution higher than you since Barnes was a starter and played more minutes per game than Iggy. Neither one is a HOF player. I was just showing how thin your argument for being in the HOF based on being on a 73 win team was IMO.

Ron Harper was a starter on the Bulls 72 win team. He is not in the HOF and he was probably a better player than Iggy before he blew out his knee.

Comparing Harrison Barnes and Rob Harper to Andre Iguodala? Are you insane? You're either a troll or you have no idea what your talking about.

[Anticon]

I doubt it. Did 4 of the Bulls 72 wins starters get in? Iggy is a solid player but he was much more of a passenger than the driving force for those 73 wins. Actually your argument has a significant flaw. Iggy started 1 game all season on that 73 win team. Might as well say Harrison Barnes who started all season and played more minutes per game deserves the HOF if going by that standard.

I mean, if you think Iguodala and Harrison Barnes had the same impact on the Warriors I'm not sure what to tell you. And Pippen, Jordan and Rodman from the 96 Bulls are all in the Hall so...

And again, no one here is articulating the actual criteria the Hall of Fame will use. People are substituting their own standards.

Jordan, Pippen and Rodman are 3 players not 4 players as you said in your post. They are 3 starters from their 72 win season not a backup. They are 3 guys that would have been in the Hall with or without winning 72 games in a season. Your argument is full of holes.

Actually Steve Kerr must have viewed Barnes contribution higher than you since Barnes was a starter and played more minutes per game than Iggy. Neither one is a HOF player. I was just showing how thin your argument for being in the HOF based on being on a 73 win team was IMO.

Ron Harper was a starter on the Bulls 72 win team. He is not in the HOF and he was probably a better player than Iggy before he blew out his knee.

I don't know man, all this shows is how little you understand the Warriors and how critical Iggy was to them winning a title.

[shi-woo]

Made an Allstar team. All-Defense team. Won a Gold Medal. Has 3 rings and counting, and a Finals MVP to cap it all off.

Sure, he isn't as talented as some guy in or out, but in terms of career, absolutely he deserves it, and I bet guys like Gary Payton, John Stockton, ect would kill to have had the career of iguadala.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

[Dantares]

I feel like the hof shouldn't just reward scorers and offensive players. I would like to see a great defensive player and all around player like iggy get in.