Pelon chingon wrote:Well Kawhi himself also killed the Heat and Warriors.
Are you saying the sneaky, dirty rat, Kawhi, planned this?
Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav
Pelon chingon wrote:Well Kawhi himself also killed the Heat and Warriors.


infintybeyond wrote:I wonder which one is Kawhi's sister?


Ayt wrote:Salieri wrote:So we got posters advocating for the death penalty in this case and others claiming they hate the "innocent until proven guilty" principle.
Never change, America.
The person who brought up the innocent until proven guilty thing is Australian so good job, good effort. He also isn't wrong if he was talking about perceptions outside of court which I think he obviously was. I didn't need OJ Simpson to be found guilty of murder for me to think he murdered his ex-wife.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is an excellent principle in law, but it doesn't need to apply outside the courtroom.
lonzo_pelota wrote:Was this the same kawhi leonard sister that said he was leaving toronto on her Instagram live during the playoffs?



Salieri wrote:So we got posters advocating for the death penalty in this case and others claiming they hate the "innocent until proven guilty" principle.
Never change, America.
jason bourne wrote:lonzo_pelota wrote:Was this the same kawhi leonard sister that said he was leaving toronto on her Instagram live during the playoffs?
No, that was Miesha Slayton, another sister.

jason bourne wrote:lonzo_pelota wrote:Was this the same kawhi leonard sister that said he was leaving toronto on her Instagram live during the playoffs?
No, that was Miesha Slayton, another sister.
jason bourne wrote:lonzo_pelota wrote:Was this the same kawhi leonard sister that said he was leaving toronto on her Instagram live during the playoffs?
No, that was Miesha Slayton, another sister.
RakimAbdulJabar wrote:Showdown wrote:RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
You’ve missed my point, which is there’s absolutely no reason to mention that she’s his sister, why does the reader need that information?
I didn’t think I had to expand on it but maybe it wasn’t clear so I will. When I mentioned punishing the family it very simply comes down to
1. Having your name publicly associated with such an act
2. The potential for messed up fans to say some stupid things to ‘trash talk’ him in this regard.
Unfortunately we’ve seen it too many times with some fans not respecting the lines of trash talk and by making this connection you’re potentially creating an unnecessary scenario where a fan crosses that line.
I don’t see any benefit whatsoever to providing such information to the public.
They do it for more clicks pageviews and so that we can know more about his background.
I know why they do it, I'm pointing out how I find it unethical and inappropriate

Unknown wrote:Dwarves laugh when they run because the grass tickles their balls.
RakimAbdulJabar wrote:righterwriter wrote:RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
You’ve missed my point, which is there’s absolutely no reason to mention that she’s his sister, why does the reader need that information?
I didn’t think I had to expand on it but maybe it wasn’t clear so I will. When I mentioned punishing the family it very simply comes down to
1. Having your name publicly associated with such an act
2. The potential for messed up fans to say some stupid things to ‘trash talk’ him in this regard.
Unfortunately we’ve seen it too many times with some fans not respecting the lines of trash talk and by making this connection you’re potentially creating an unnecessary scenario where a fan crosses that line.
I don’t see any benefit whatsoever to providing such information to the public.
It's news because people care.
What does that even mean? How is that in any way related to what I wrote? People care? What the hell is going on in this thread, I couldn't be more clear...there is no reason for us to know that she's Leonard's sister, what good does that do to anyone?
Ayt wrote:Salieri wrote:So we got posters advocating for the death penalty in this case and others claiming they hate the "innocent until proven guilty" principle.
Never change, America.
The person who brought up the innocent until proven guilty thing is Australian so good job, good effort. He also isn't wrong if he was talking about perceptions outside of court which I think he obviously was. I didn't need OJ Simpson to be found guilty of murder for me to think he murdered his ex-wife.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is an excellent principle in law, but it doesn't need to apply outside the courtroom.
zzaj wrote:Innocent until proven guilty but...
What kind of idiot would think they could get away with ANYTHING in a casino. There are literally cameras covering everything...including who enters and exits the bathrooms.
righterwriter wrote:RakimAbdulJabar wrote:righterwriter wrote:
It's news because people care.
What does that even mean? How is that in any way related to what I wrote? People care? What the hell is going on in this thread, I couldn't be more clear...there is no reason for us to know that she's Leonard's sister, what good does that do to anyone?
Because people care about the personal lives of celebrities.
If you think that people shouldn't care about this type of info, that's your right to do so of course, but many do (probably you as well, depending on who is being spoken about).
RakimAbdulJabar wrote:righterwriter wrote:RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
What does that even mean? How is that in any way related to what I wrote? People care? What the hell is going on in this thread, I couldn't be more clear...there is no reason for us to know that she's Leonard's sister, what good does that do to anyone?
Because people care about the personal lives of celebrities.
If you think that people shouldn't care about this type of info, that's your right to do so of course, but many do (probably you as well, depending on who is being spoken about).
You’re still missing my point, the ‘celebrity’ didn’t do anything wrong and shouldn’t be mentioned when/if a family member does something wrong
Secondly I find the whole celebrity BS to be ridiculous. I’m not interested in people getting any kind of special treatment OR vice versa because they play a sport at a level better than the rest of the world, can sing, act...whatever it is.
They bleed and defecate just like the rest of us, they’re not special and I don’t care what they’re doing unless I choose to view them performing in their specific field
I despise that they get given free things when they of all people can afford it, but I also don’t feel it’s fair to constantly harass them with cameras and include their names in news reports when/if someone related to them commits a crime just to get extra clicks, it’s not ethical
People will say “they chose that life”, my response is that I have an issue with just accepting that we need to operate under these conditions because it’s become ‘normal’ to make these people more important than what they actually are
Let them play their sport, sing, act, entertain or whatever it is they do and then go about having a normal life.
We don’t need to place them on a pedestal or tear them down. We certainly don’t need to know what they wore, who they’re dating, where they went on holidays or what crime a family member committed, the whole thing is ridiculous

Warning: don't bait
