nikster wrote:WarriorGM wrote:nikster wrote:Yes. That was the point of my post. I didn't say Lebron had a particularly hard path. Was just addressing a poster implying curry had it harder with the east VS west argument
But Curry did.
And I completely disagree with that. Instead of some lazy East VS West argument why don't you point to a run of Currys that was significantly tougher than any of Lebrons?
I can point to an easier run to the finals than any of Curry’s, the 2016 title when the Cavs absolutely cake walked through an historically weak Eastern conference.
They chose different paths is all. LeBron certainly has it as an individual player, he was highly elite as a defensive player in his prime with Curry probably best described as serviceable on that end. I take Curry as a player to build a team around though, and prefer the GSW brand of basketball to LeBron ball, although in the one year he was paired with a player who complemented him perfectly, in 2019-2020 with a healthy Davis, that team played fairly awesome basketball. I don’t accept and have never accepted the Curry has/had more help while LeBron never had enough help thing however. LeBron’s teams/help from 2010 on were chosen by him while Curry’s “help” has mostly evolved alongside him; 5 of the 6 best GSW players this year were drafted by them, and current Wiggins who was reviled as a bust and the worst contract in the NBA when he joined GSW is the most useful version imo. Even KD made his best contribution to winning, again imo, in 2017 playing next to Curry, and was at his best defensively then.
LeBron the better floor raiser, and possibly the GOAT floor raiser at that, Curry the better ceiling raiser imo without totally subsuming his team/franchise.