This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's.

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#101 » by The Rebel » Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:53 pm

Homer38 wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
Homer38 wrote:
He is 37 at this point and he can't healthy since the moment a scrub like Solomon Hill jump in his leg in 2021

I am sure you have an excuse for 2019 as well?



Health again......This is the fact.The lakers were fourth in the west before his groin injury.....The cavs would not make the playoffs in 2018 if he would have the same problem and missing so many game....

So Lebron gets the health excuse but nobody else does.
Red8911
RealGM
Posts: 14,840
And1: 4,719
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: BROOKLYN

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#102 » by Red8911 » Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:58 pm

nikster wrote:
Jonny Blaze wrote:
Homer38 wrote:

C'mon....It was more that Curry vs LBJ in his finals...I mean just in 2016,Curry was awful,LeBron was legendary on offense and defense and the finals were still close.....



2016 was 6 years ago. Since that Finals loss Curry has won 3 more NBA Titles.
He now has 2 NBA titles without Kevin Durant. point being that Lebron fans need to get over 2016.

The Warriors have won titles with Harrison Barnes, Kevin Durant and Andrew Wiggins at the power forward spot.
Barnes and Wiggins are considered somewhat average....but when they play with Curry they end up being NBA Champions.

Curry has 2 titles playing with a way more talented team then Lebron ever had, and the 2015 title is easier then Lebron ever had.

As for conference play, 2016 is the only year Curry had a tough trip to the finals
Why Lebron didn’t have talented teams in Miami and Cleveland? He didn’t win alone, he had a lot of help.
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,436
And1: 12,938
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#103 » by nikster » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:10 pm

Red8911 wrote:
nikster wrote:
Jonny Blaze wrote:

2016 was 6 years ago. Since that Finals loss Curry has won 3 more NBA Titles.
He now has 2 NBA titles without Kevin Durant. point being that Lebron fans need to get over 2016.

The Warriors have won titles with Harrison Barnes, Kevin Durant and Andrew Wiggins at the power forward spot.
Barnes and Wiggins are considered somewhat average....but when they play with Curry they end up being NBA Champions.

Curry has 2 titles playing with a way more talented team then Lebron ever had, and the 2015 title is easier then Lebron ever had.

As for conference play, 2016 is the only year Curry had a tough trip to the finals
Why Lebron didn’t have talented teams in Miami and Cleveland? He didn’t win alone, he had a lot of help.

I never said that
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 8,866
And1: 5,489
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#104 » by The4thHorseman » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:20 pm

Goomba3666 wrote:
WargamesX wrote:Where was this Curry is better than Lebron as Klay was healing and the warriors were in the lottery?


Ahhh. The season where they were still suffering from injuries and Curry broke his hand early in the season?

Pretty much the same place Lebron + AD + Dwight + Melo+ Westbrook are in this season.

Curry could have came back that season but GS voluntarily tanked instead by shutting down Draymond also.

Big difference between the 2 situations.
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 8,866
And1: 5,489
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#105 » by The4thHorseman » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:33 pm

rapstarter wrote:
Mr Loggins wrote:Is this the same steph that needed KD to join his team so he could beat LeBron?


This is the Steph that didn't jump ship 3 times so he could win easy rings. He won before KD and now after KD.

Which rings were easy to win?
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
User avatar
rapstarter
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,406
And1: 5,928
Joined: Feb 01, 2017
     

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#106 » by rapstarter » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:41 pm

The4thHorseman wrote:
rapstarter wrote:
Mr Loggins wrote:Is this the same steph that needed KD to join his team so he could beat LeBron?


This is the Steph that didn't jump ship 3 times so he could win easy rings. He won before KD and now after KD.

Which rings were easy to win?


I don't know. Maybe go watch that "not 1 not 2 not 3, it's going to be easy" welcome party video again.
User avatar
infinite11285
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,131
And1: 26,934
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#107 » by infinite11285 » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:41 pm

Goomba3666 wrote:
Homer38 wrote:Only if you think that Curry is a top 5 players ever

Read on Twitter


That's a cool graphic, but it seems like Curry is able to, you know, WIN at a faster clip.

If the goal is to win, it just seems like the gap of accomplishments are null.


The gap between individual accomplishments are null? Since when? You can't simply disregard the gap between two players you chose to compare fresh off the heels of a team accomplishment (a championship) to pigeonhole the discussion. The gap in individual achievements is directly material to your topic.

If we're keeping score, LeBron has:

3 more finals mvps
2 more mvps
9 more NBA First teams
9 more All NBA teams
5 more NBA Defense first teams
6 more All NBA all Defense teams
10 more All Star selections

Additionally, he averages more points, assists, and rebounds than Curry in the Regular Season, Playoffs, and Finals. Those are empirical, inarguable facts that can't be ignored so you can better substantiate the (mostly) subjective points offered in your OP.

How are eras being defined and what's the cut-off? Why aren't overlapping eras being considered? Kawhi, Dirk, and Giannis also won championships during the "eras" of Steph and LeBron, so what does that mean for the topic?
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 8,866
And1: 5,489
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#108 » by The4thHorseman » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:48 pm

Jonny Blaze wrote:
Homer38 wrote:
Jonny Blaze wrote:
Steph Curry beat Lebron's team in the 2015 Finals.

Steph Curry and Lebron now have the same amount of titles at 4....and Curry is 3-1 against Lebron in the Finals.

The 2015*, 2016 and 2022* were not super teams by any stretch of the imagination.

This years championship is more impressive than any title that Lebron has accomplished based on the supporting cast.

*Denotes NBA Champion



C'mon....It was more that Curry vs LBJ in his finals...I mean just in 2016,Curry was awful,LeBron was legendary on offense and defense and the finals were still close.....



2016 was 6 years ago. Since that Finals loss Curry has won 3 more NBA Titles.
He now has 2 NBA titles without Kevin Durant. point being that Lebron fans need to get over 2016.

The Warriors have won titles with Harrison Barnes, Kevin Durant and Andrew Wiggins at the power forward spot.
Barnes and Wiggins are considered somewhat average....but when they play with Curry they end up being NBA Champions.

What did Kyrie or Love win before playing with LeBron? They hadn't even made the postseason yet.
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 8,866
And1: 5,489
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#109 » by The4thHorseman » Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:52 pm

rapstarter wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:
rapstarter wrote:
This is the Steph that didn't jump ship 3 times so he could win easy rings. He won before KD and now after KD.

Which rings were easy to win?


I don't know. Maybe go watch that "not 1 not 2 not 3, it's going to be easy" welcome party video again.

You never had a pep rally in high school for an upcoming sporting event?

So which of the 4 were easy to win?
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,363
And1: 12,456
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#110 » by Lalouie » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:02 pm

Goomba3666 wrote:4 rings with the SAME franchise in 7 years.

Won rings with different sets of roles players whom he all made look better. Basically everyone 'fit in'.

Wiggins, who Lebron had traded away to get Kevin Love, FLOURISHED alongside a guy that beat Lebron 3x in the finals in Curry.

Literally gas made EVERY TEAMMATE better by merely just his presence on the floor. From superstars like KD, to players like McGee/Nick Young/Draymond/Zaza Pachulia, to players to Poole & Gary Payton Jr. Unlike Bron, he really makes teammates better and fundamental pieces to the team regardless of the level they're at.

And most of all - NO EXCUSES. This team had major injuries earlier in the season and mid season, but weathered the storm. Him, nor his teammates, aren't in ENDLESS trade rumors during those losing slumps unlike every team Lebron is on. Truly fosters a positive work environment.

The Steph Era. Happy to be a part of it.


lebron is not an enabler.
never was.
hate to bring it up yet again but he always retooled everyone's game to fit him. a true enabler helps players acheive their ceiling, but lebron was always about "let me compartmentalize you so you can help me, and by helping me THAT"S how i can get us a ring". it's not lebron's fault that he's 6'8/255 with a complete skillset, but that is the only way he can utilize his body to enable his game. i am a big believer in one being "a prisoner" of one's talent. but it is not a game i like because it only helps him, not others.

but there's the hardware and there's the image. curry's hardware is more "true", lebron's is manufactured - he bent the rules in his favor, which is not very "sporting" is it because when you get down to it, there' aren't very many stars who have the power to do it. he chose to take advantage because he could. that's not competition, that's an unlevel playing field. but lebron's image is HUGE so whether you or i like it or not this has been lebron's era - he's got bigger feet
jals
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 149
Joined: Jul 08, 2013

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#111 » by jals » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:07 pm

Lebron is a better player than Curry, full stop.

But Curry and his organization have dominated since 2015, no question about it. And moreover, Curry (and his organization recognizing the implications of his skillset and the current rules) has absolutely changed the dominant strategy of basketball forever.

Both can be true.
User avatar
infinite11285
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,131
And1: 26,934
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#112 » by infinite11285 » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:08 pm

rapstarter wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:
rapstarter wrote:
This is the Steph that didn't jump ship 3 times so he could win easy rings. He won before KD and now after KD.

Which rings were easy to win?


I don't know. Maybe go watch that "not 1 not 2 not 3, it's going to be easy" welcome party video again.


Citing words said in jest during a rally from over a decade ago can't be used to skirt from answering the question.

You claimed LeBron jumped ship to win "easy" rings. Exactly which ring did you consider easy?
at87on
Rookie
Posts: 1,124
And1: 380
Joined: Nov 04, 2003

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#113 » by at87on » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:10 pm

KnicksGadfly wrote:Curry is probably the biggest reason why Lebron won’t ever be considered the GOAT


I think Kevin Durant is that reason.
Without Durant, Lebron has at least 2 more titles.
Freighttrain
Analyst
Posts: 3,663
And1: 7,084
Joined: Aug 08, 2014
   

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#114 » by Freighttrain » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:10 pm

Yeah, and the '90s were Hakeems decade
jals
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 149
Joined: Jul 08, 2013

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#115 » by jals » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:20 pm

infinite11285 wrote:
rapstarter wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:Which rings were easy to win?


I don't know. Maybe go watch that "not 1 not 2 not 3, it's going to be easy" welcome party video again.


Citing words said in jest during a rally from over a decade ago can't be used to skirt from answering the question.

You claimed LeBron jumped ship to win "easy" rings. Exactly which ring did you consider easy?


Lebron won 4 rings by stacking teams. He lost 2 because someone else stacked better than him (KD Warriors). Curry won 2 "organically" and lost 1 due to someone else stacking (2016) and 1-2 due to injuries (which is normal btw). On net, Lebron has probably benefitted more from the superstar stacking era, but that doesn't mean he's not a better player and the best player of the post-Jordan decades. Curry has undoubtedly impacted the league more. Which one do you value in terms of declaring "ownership" of an era?
Goomba3666
Veteran
Posts: 2,973
And1: 3,315
Joined: Jun 16, 2021

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#116 » by Goomba3666 » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:21 pm

infinite11285 wrote:
Goomba3666 wrote:
Homer38 wrote:Only if you think that Curry is a top 5 players ever

Read on Twitter


That's a cool graphic, but it seems like Curry is able to, you know, WIN at a faster clip.

If the goal is to win, it just seems like the gap of accomplishments are null.


The gap between individual accomplishments are null? Since when? You can't simply disregard the gap between two players you chose to compare fresh off the heels of a team accomplishment (a championship) to pigeonhole the discussion. The gap in individual achievements is directly material to your topic.

If we're keeping score, LeBron has:

3 more finals mvps
2 more mvps
9 more NBA First teams
9 more All NBA teams
5 more NBA Defense first teams
6 more All NBA all Defense teams
10 more All Star selections

Additionally, he averages more points, assists, and rebounds than Curry in the Regular Season, Playoffs, and Finals. Those are empirical, inarguable facts that can't be ignored so you can better substantiate the (mostly) subjective points offered in your OP.

How are eras being defined and what's the cut-off? Why aren't overlapping eras being considered? Kawhi, Dirk, and Giannis also won championships during the "eras" of Steph and LeBron, so what does that mean for the topic?


To answer your last question - it means that Curry became the became the orca in an ocean of 6'8-6'10 sharks.

Bron, KD, Giannis, Kawhi are all great. But Curry came out on top more often than not. That's what makes Curry's path incredible. The rise and falls. The injuries. The doubt. And here we are with Otto Porter starting in a Finals Game and Curry making him look like a crucial pice of a championship run. Lol.

It's just different and everyone knows it. Feels like dude has a chance to win alongside virtually any mediocre player because he's knows how to maximize everyone's talent to make them fit into a team structure.
User avatar
An Unbiased Fan
RealGM
Posts: 11,738
And1: 5,709
Joined: Jan 16, 2009
       

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#117 » by An Unbiased Fan » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:26 pm

Here's the thing, in 2011 Lebron teamed with three other stars to try and do what Curry has done. One guy has bounced from team to team trying to chase rings, and the other has done it with one core. If Curry joins the upper tier of champions, then this is definitely his era.

Legends with 5 rings

Russell
MJ
Kareem
Kobe
Duncan
Magic
^
NBA history can be mapped out with these guys
7-time RealGM MVPoster 2009-2016
Inducted into RealGM HOF 1st ballot in 2017
WintaSoldier1
Junior
Posts: 275
And1: 161
Joined: Mar 18, 2022
 

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#118 » by WintaSoldier1 » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:38 pm

An Unbiased Fan wrote:Here's the thing, in 2011 Lebron teamed with three other stars to try and do what Curry has done. One guy has bounced from team to team trying to chase rings, and the other has done it with one core. If Curry joins the upper tier of champions, then this is definitely his era.

Legends with 5 rings

Russell
MJ
Kareem
Kobe
Duncan
Magic
^
NBA history can be mapped out with these guys



Why is Loyalty + Success the given Criteria? Just because they all have a common denominator??

And the claim, that NBA history can be mapped out with those people is flat out false, firstly you miss LBJ’s Era of History, Which overlaps with Kobe’s beginning in 07’.

Lebron’s Era of Player Empowerment, is directly responsible for 2 Of Curry’s Rings(KD).

To ignore LBJ’s obvious impact on the NBA is just ignorant and flat out wrong. And your earlier statement also excludes a plethora of people who were almost impactful in NBA History.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,272
And1: 2,983
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#119 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:48 pm

5-year peaks in PS BPM

Lebron- 10.83

Steph-7.83

3-year playoff peaks in AuPM

Lebron-7.9

Steph-5.7

Top 3-year team playoff offenses by rORTG

Lebron- +9.4

Steph- +7.5

3-year playoff Backpicks BPM

Lebron-9

Steph-6.9

15-20 Playoff PIPM

Lebron-7.37

Steph-3.95
Goomba3666
Veteran
Posts: 2,973
And1: 3,315
Joined: Jun 16, 2021

Re: This is OBVIOUSLY Steph's era- not Lebron's. 

Post#120 » by Goomba3666 » Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:51 pm

Bron stans saying the quiet parts loud in this thread. The media has slipped up this year too.

By listening to people talk about Bron, you'd think that basketball isn't necessarily about winning, but about individual accomplishments.

Media has done it several times when they were crunching numbers live on TV to determine how Bron would win the scoring title while his team was getting monkey stomped every night.

Sad times for basketball.

Return to The General Board