xinxin wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:xinxin wrote: if you don’t want to count the Lakers bubble title, it’s only fair that you shouldn’t count the lock out shortened ‘99 season for the Spurs.. the bubble season at least had 72 games per team , & the playoffs were all best of 7 series.. whereas the 99 season only had 50 games for the regular season and the first round was only a best of 5..
which will give the lakers a 5-4 lead over the spurs. Lakers also had 2 back to back chips, that the Spurs never did even with pretty much the same core..
Plus, 8 finals appearances for the lakers over 5 for the spurs. Don’t forget Magic’s last finals appearance was in 91.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry but the bubble and the lockout are two completely different things. You can't compare completely ending the NBA season only to have some Disney camp playoffs.
Also the spurs made 6 finals, not 5. The spurs won more games in total over this time frame (225 regular season games). Spurs made the playoffs 29 times vs 24 for the lakers. Spurs lost in the conference finals 5 times vs the lakers 1. Lost in the simi finals 9 times vs 7.
You can certainly choose the lakers here based on the extra title and a few more finals, but the spurs have certainly had more success in terms of simply winning games and being competitive more consistently.
I know the Spurs went to 6 finals. I only said 5 as a hypothetical answer to what the other poster said that the bubble title didn’t count, thus my counter was the 99 lockout season shouldn’t count either. So instead of 9 NBA finals for the lakers, let’s go with 8. While instead of 6 finals for the Spurs, let’s bring it down to 5.
It’s silly I understand . But he started it. Ha ha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The bubble and the lockout have zero to do with each other. Of course the bubble won't ever be seen the same as any other title. Fans universally agreed on that before the bubble even started.


















