eyeatoma wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
No I’m talking about football (soccer) there are other teams in other leagues that can beat for example teams in the premier league. There is no one football league that has a monopoly on the best teams like the NBA does.
I agree, but that doesn't mean you get to tout yourself as world champions lol? Just use NBA champions, why is it so hard for people to just do that. Just seems like the NBA, and US major sports leagues like the MLB are compensating for something. World has a global connotation to it. By global, many countries participating. Like the Olympics, the Winter Olympics, the FIBA world championships, the Cricket World Cup, the Rugby World Cup, the World Chess Championships, the FIFA Football World Cup.
Note the operative word here is "World", and in all cases you have many countries participating.
Look, everyone agrees that the NBA is the best collection of basketball players in the world, however, it is still a US national league, that despite it's global status, mainly markets itself to the United States. This is something that has been done for 40-50 years, and I think it's mostly done because it was done in the past. That doesn't mean that there was ever any logic to it. Trying to rationalise it just comes off as being overly sensitive and defensive.
The fact that a US athlete says this shows that the problem is mainly coming from the United States and the dominating mentality they have had since World War I and II. I for one love many things about America, my wife and kids are American, my sister is an American citizen, and I will always be connected to that country, but as an outsider looking in, there are so many things that the US does right, but just as much that it can improve on. Trying to tone down the rhetoric, and appearing to be more humble would be a great first step.