Dominator83 wrote:If i were Indy I would be trying 1 pick and Benedict
Why would you be trying to trade Mathurin?
Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77
Dominator83 wrote:If i were Indy I would be trying 1 pick and Benedict
 
                                      
                                                                      xBulletproof wrote:dkb964 wrote:xBulletproof wrote:
Why? Pacers picks are all late firsts, we own a couple extra and they're late 1sts most likely.
Late 1sts rarely translate to anything in reality. If a team offered me to 20+ first round picks for Mathurin I'm saying no without hesitation, and I'm one of the Pacers fans who isn't as high on him.
OG Anunoby and Pascal Siakam were both drafted in the late 20s.
Doesn't change the fact that finding a guy like that is 5%. Go back decades, and go through the picks in the 20's. If you don't follow college basketball you won't even hardly know some of them. There was a study I saw years ago that showed past 15th pick you had like a 5% chance at a guy who will make an All Star game. That means the average team will find one of those guys every 20 years or something. I don't remember exactly what it was, but it was in that range.
 
                                                                                                          WuTang_OG wrote:ArksNetsSince99 wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:
I think Simmons takes the cake
Ben is an expiring next season so easily tradable salary , Beal is not
ya but next season isn't this season. right now one of the worst with wiggins

 
                    
                                                                                        ArksNetsSince99 wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:ArksNetsSince99 wrote:
Ben is an expiring next season so easily tradable salary , Beal is not
ya but next season isn't this season. right now one of the worst with wiggins
Stop lowering Ben’s value, you buying or not ?

Childs wrote:I'd be a little surprise if its true. The Raptors don't typically leak things until the trade happens.
 
                                      
                                                                       
                                      
                                                                      ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Indy is a dumb team , right when they starting to gain momentum and they’re maybe one solid piece or two from contention they gonna trade for Siakam
Some teams never learn
Two years from now they will be in the same boat when Hali ask to be traded
 
                    
                                      
                                                    Hoop Hunter wrote:I hate it. Unless it's a sign and trade, Then still kinda hate it.

If I am the Raptors GM and you guys want my Siakam, all I want is Walker and Mathurin plus a 2nd round pick. Thats more than fair since they can keep all your 1st rounders.ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Indy is a dumb team , right when they starting to gain momentum and they’re maybe one solid piece or two from contention they gonna trade for Siakam
Some teams never learn
Two years from now they will be in the same boat when Hali ask to be traded

Hoop Hunter wrote:ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Indy is a dumb team , right when they starting to gain momentum and they’re maybe one solid piece or two from contention they gonna trade for Siakam
Some teams never learn
Two years from now they will be in the same boat when Hali ask to be traded
What do you mean by some teams never learn? Seriously what are you talking about? You're talking out the wrong orifice dude.
We've not drafted that great, but we've been really good on trades for decades.
 
                                      
                                                                      WentzerWuver wrote:If I am the Raptors GM and you guys want my Siakam, all I want is Walker and Mathurin plus a 2nd round pick. Thats more than fair since they can keep all your 1st rounders.ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Indy is a dumb team , right when they starting to gain momentum and they’re maybe one solid piece or two from contention they gonna trade for Siakam
Some teams never learn
Two years from now they will be in the same boat when Hali ask to be traded
 
  
  
                    
                    
                                                                       
                    
                    
                    
                                      
               Saints14 wrote:If he was a few years younger I'd love it for Indy. He's a great fit but I wouldn't want to pay him big money into his 30s, and I certainly wouldn't want to trade 3 firsts (and Brown) for the not even guaranteed privilege of doing so
xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:Dominator83 wrote:If i were Indy I would be trying 1 pick and Benedict
Why would you be trying to trade Mathurin?
 
                    
                    
                    
                                      
               zimpy27 wrote:Hoop Hunter wrote:ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Indy is a dumb team , right when they starting to gain momentum and they’re maybe one solid piece or two from contention they gonna trade for Siakam
Some teams never learn
Two years from now they will be in the same boat when Hali ask to be traded
What do you mean by some teams never learn? Seriously what are you talking about? You're talking out the wrong orifice dude.
We've not drafted that great, but we've been really good on trades for decades.
Yeah..
IND24FRP and OKC24FRP are like going to be around pick 20 and 27 in what's called a poor draft year.
That 3rd pick needs to be juicy otherwise this is solid for Pacers.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Jimmit79 wrote:You know why raps going after Knicks players cause they stole our plays
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

Oscirus wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Hoop Hunter wrote:What do you mean by some teams never learn? Seriously what are you talking about? You're talking out the wrong orifice dude.
We've not drafted that great, but we've been really good on trades for decades.
Yeah..
IND24FRP and OKC24FRP are like going to be around pick 20 and 27 in what's called a poor draft year.
That 3rd pick needs to be juicy otherwise this is solid for Pacers.
3 cost controlled players even if they only turn out to be rotational players is a lot for a player that the raptors weren't going to re-sign. It also speeds up the pacers championship window while depleting their assets.
 
                                                                                                          Dominator83 wrote:xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:Dominator83 wrote:If i were Indy I would be trying 1 pick and Benedict
Why would you be trying to trade Mathurin?
Because he sucks. Empty calories inefficient scorer that does nothing else. Trade him now while now Still has perceived value
djsunyc wrote:tj mcconnell....the michael jordan of jj barea's.
kenwood3333 wrote:3 FRP sounds good in theory, but the Raptors has such a poor history of drafting, almost every pick except Barnes turn out to be bust.