eyeatoma wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
Neither one of us are going to convince the other, so let's just leave it at that.
Aka "I'm wrong and you got me so I'mma just say something like agree to disagree" despite this not being a discussion but more of you being proven wrong and told the facts.
You were proven wrong, by the NBA in game 2, and
went hard for the Knicks having earned that victory. Keep that same energy on this one lol. Pot meet kettle.
They did. You have to understand that yes, there was a missed call at the end, but the Knicks still had to make winning plays in order to win, the refs didn't literally award the Knicks 3 points on the board. The Knicks had to hit that Brunson 3, steal the ball(which was a foul according to the L2M) but then also get a 3, they MISSED it, Hartenstein then had to get the offensive rebound over 4 Sixers, somehow get that pass back out to OG despite falling down inbetween 4 Sixers, and Divo still had to hit the big 3. AND the game wasn't even over either, then Hartenstein had to also block Maxey's layup attempt too to win the game. Theres like 6-7 winning plays that if the Knicks doesn't make one of them they still lose despite the ONE missed call.
Its why I didn't make a huge deal about the Game 5 Maxey travel, because he still had to make the crazy and1 3, and then deep 3 right after, and then the Sixers still had to win it in OT so they earned it despite that missed Maxey call.
I hope you get what I'm saying here, I genuinely understand the frustration with game 2, but to also act like the Knicks didn't earn it AT ALL, is also disingenuous imo.