HotelVitale wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Daryl Morey has become the used car salesman of GM's in the NBA.
He's now run two franchises into the ground around aging superstars.
It doesn't matter if the Sixers get in because they are a horribly constructed team that relies on two unreliable guys when it comes to playoff time...If I were a Sixers fan I'd be livid. Morey has been terrible and basically living off of the Embiid injury excuse for 2 years now.
This all sounds like sports talk radio jawing, Morey's not some amazing genius or whatever but he's generally made good gambles and given the Sixers chances while they were in tight spots. Only the most low-info Sixers fans think he sucks at his job or put the blame for the Sixers' current situation.
I won't go through all of Morey's good moves--or rather his gambles that worked out--but there are a good # of them. He's got faults for sure but it's also not really his fault that Embiid's immature on court and off, that the Simmons thing happened, that he came into a team with Al Horford on a large contract and a maxed out Tobias Harris, etc. We've had chances to go further than we did every single year and the end result was always disappointment on the court, and then some decent moves to make the team better.
This year almost everything he tried isn't working. It happens. Aside from McCain and Yabusele being really good on offense right away, every other move's been bad luck. PG gets injured sometimes, sure, but he doesn't usually miss most of the first month of a season, Embiid gets injured too but he's never had anything like his start to this season, Maxey has a long track record of playing better than he has so far, and then all of the pretty solid older vet min guys who played well enough last year--R Jackson, Lowry, Drummond, E Gordon, etc--just haven't played well so far and look like they're one season too far. Saying they should've somehow got better vet min guys or ones who would be playing better now is just that empty sports talk time-filler. Yeah we would all liked to win gambles and land players who play well. Same thing with C Martin and Oubre, got both on good deals and they're simply playing much worse than they have in the recent past.
I don't mind basic criticism of Morey, he has a couple of big and consistent blindspots IMO. And the Sixers are in a garbage situation at the moment. Just tedious to hear takes like 'Drummond was signed for the minimum and he hasn't saved the franchise?!?' and 'Caleb Martin had a bad month, Morey failed!' We're all smart enough and have seen enough ball to know that all of team building takes a ton of luck, and all a GM really does is try to make the best of his opportunities etc.
Eh this seems like more excuse making to me. It's the story of his GM'ing career IMO. Chuck everything up to bad luck when it doesn't work out. Sell everyone on the "moar stars" approach and when it doesn't work out because the rest of the roster has holes or he banked on the wrong mix of stars working out you can just blame it on "bad luck". Fine you want to chuck up the Rockets to just having bad timing because of the Warriors... I'm willing to listen to that argument. I think what he's done as a Sixers GM is not bad luck however. I refuse to believe that. It's bad planning IMO.
Sorry if it comes off as sports radio talk. I just don't want to drole on in paragraphs about why I think Morey isn't a great GM on the whole and particularly his Sixers tenure has been poor. Here's some basic stuff he missed on, IMO, when taking into account what the Sixers had:
- One of the main issues with the Sixers over the years has been the non-Embiid minutes. Yet him and every other GM never seem to put any real resources into a quality backup C or at least do the scouting necessary to find the right cheap one. They already had Drummond once and he failed! Why do it again?! When they did try to make sure they had cover for him they spunked the money on Horford (not Morey I know) but just because it didn't work once with committing something significant to a backup big doesn't mean you should abandon the idea altogether. Especially when you know your C is going to, at this point, miss 20 games a year. And that's the optimistic outlook! How do you not invest something significant for insurance purposes for your broken star? These are the bigs he invested in since taking the GM role:
Washed Dwight (minimum)
Vincent Poirier (out of the league)
Drummond (2x both minimum deals)
Paul Reed (probably the best result but still was not a great player no matter how many "out the mud" shirts he sold LOL)
Washed Millsap (minimum)
Cauley-Stein (out of the league)
Washed DeAndre Jordan (minimum)
Harrell (This was probably his best attempt to cover for Embiid with a real guy. Just didn't work out)
Not one significant draft pick used on this position since he's taken over. Had to let Paul Reed walk so he could do what he did this summer. And even with Paul Reed, he got played off the floor in the playoffs... He's just maneuvered incredibly poorly when it comes to the C position IMO when it's been known that the Sixers have lost series before because they could not survive without Embiid on the floor. That's not "bad luck" it's just poor planning IMO.
-Doubling down on an oft-injured over 30 player to pair with Embiid this summer just seems incredibly obtuse to me. Yes you can say you have a "higher ceiling" but what does that actually matter if your chances of reaching that ceiling are low because your two stars are prone to sitting out? If you're going to "punt" on the regular season, then you need to be sure you have one of the most "talented" squads in the league. I still feel like even with a healthy PG, the Sixers are no more talented than the Celtics, Mavs, Knicks, Nuggets, Suns, Thunder and Bucks when fully healthy. And most of those teams have much better supporting casts to their stars. Not only that, but also PG maybe has 1-2 true good seasons left. You've made your competitive window incredibly tight when you had so much flexibility to explore other options this summer. I just think if I were a Sixers fan, I'd be disappointed that the grand plan of all of this maneuvering to get cap space was to sign 34 year old PG coming off another poor playoff performance and try to hit on mid level/minimum guys to hopefully fill out the roster.
He deserves credit for the Maxey draft pick and (so far) McCain. Oubre for the most part has been a revelation. Even though I think he ended up flubbing the Harden situation, that was a good return for Simmons given the nature of the trade. So it hasn't been all bad and Embiid definitely deserves some of the blame here. I just don't think his overall philosophy is a good one IMO and he doesn't seem to adapt well when things go slightly awry IMO.