rapstarter wrote:HardenToSixers wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:
Honestly what are you talking about? I have no clue how you read my entire post and came away thinking that I believe VORP is the end all for this discussion. Either reading comprehension isnt your thing, or youre a little too emotionally invested to see the forest for the trees on this one.
your argument boils down to
1. Without his two best teammates: I don't care. Sixers dealt with plenty of roster turmoil. Tobias Harris played godawful for most of the year and Sixers fans were calling for his head, Maxey is a 2nd year player, Simmons was sitting out, questionable role player depth in the front court and on the wing, issues integrating Harden caused a late season slide.
2. Wins column: once again, don't care. They're close enough that it shouldn't factor in hugely. Saying "played in more wins" is a stupid argument and splitting hairs. Sixers are a higher seed in the playoffs which offsets that.
So again, your argument mostly boils down to Jokic's advanced stats were better. Congrats.
People "don't care" about any of your nonsensical arguments either. Congrats, at least you make people laugh.
It's nonsensical that the Sixers roster around Embiid is marginally better and not as deep as Denver's? Then why is our record terrible without him? Why were we blown out for 2 straight games of this series with him gone and came back and won convincingly with him in the lineup?
It's nonsensical that we are splitting hairs in the win column? So you think an MVP should be chosen because he "played in more wins" than the competitor, even though the difference is marginal at best and the competitor had more wins overall and was the higher seed?
Not sure what is so nonsensical for you to wrap your head around chief.
