lj4mvp wrote:I had two points.
1 - the quality of the people voting isn't the best. There are quite a few people with no current ties to the league, Mugsy Bogues was just one example. There are quite a few more poeple like him on the list of voters than there are people like Jerry West.
2 - where is the logic in saying the guy the voters said had 3 top 50 teammates last year, but finished with a worse record, is better than the guy who had no top 50 teammates. Perhaps there is not as much thought given to absolute positions withing the 50, but that doesn't change the fact that multiple teammates of Kobe's were voted into the 50. This either shows a built in lakers bias within the voters or shows that Kobe won less with a lot more help.
1. There are not "quite a few", there are some.. And how do you know what ties they have to the league? Even if they have none, Im sure they still watch basketball. Are we going to totally disregard the opinions of the majority, just because it doesnt fit your argument? At the very worst, LeBron homers have got to realize Kobe and LeBron are equal in the eyes of the majority, and stop with the BS that "LeBron is widely regarded as the best in the NBA".. Cause thats just plain not true.
2. How many times do we need to go over this? Its very possible that they gave little thought to the list after the top 5-10 players. Disregard the rest of the list. Those people STILL THINK BY A 2-1 MARGIN THAT KOBE IS BETTER. How else can I get that thru your head?