James Harden traded to the Rockets

Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77

Knicker23
General Manager
Posts: 9,524
And1: 139
Joined: Apr 24, 2010

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1081 » by Knicker23 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:31 pm

Not convinced Harden is worth max $ or can lead a team as the focus player. However it's still a good deal for Houston to take. Clearly OKC tried to sign him, but couldn't, so I think this as a next step was a good move. Not sure you can say they're better, but they did get a good player in Martin for him and some picks.
User avatar
JustAwesome
Analyst
Posts: 3,712
And1: 80
Joined: Nov 15, 2009
Contact:

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1082 » by JustAwesome » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:32 pm

Often times, players with max potential are paid max deals. Some of the time, those players grow to become max players.
FlipTSO
Banned User
Posts: 5,442
And1: 24
Joined: Dec 20, 2011

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1083 » by FlipTSO » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:37 pm

BrooklynBulls wrote:
FlipTSO wrote:
Because Harden is a defensive liability?


And you surmise that if Martin starts, he is not?


I surmise that if they start Martin, it says to me they think he's a better starting SG than they thought Harden was.

When you draft a player 3rd overall and you were still bringing him off the bench going into his 4th year, that tells you something about what the organization sees in him. Its not a Jason Terry/Manu situation, where those guys come off the bench because they are past their prime, and neither was the 3rd overall pick.

And the idea that it doesn't matter who starts its who finishes is BS. How you set the tone on defense to start games usually determines how the rest of the game plays out.
User avatar
Zedders
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,741
And1: 613
Joined: Apr 27, 2012
       

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1084 » by Zedders » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:40 pm

REGULAR SEASON

OKC offense w/James Harden: 114.96 points per 100 possessions
OKC offense w/o James Harden: 100.84 points per 100 possessions

PLAYOFFS

OKC offense w/James Harden: 115.13 points per 100 possessions
OKC offense w/o James Harden: 102.46 points per 100 possessions
User avatar
Sasaki
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 786
Joined: May 30, 2010
 

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1085 » by Sasaki » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:41 pm

FlipTSO wrote:
BrooklynBulls wrote:
FlipTSO wrote:
Because Harden is a defensive liability?


And you surmise that if Martin starts, he is not?


I surmise that if they start Martin, it says to me they think he's a better starting SG than they thought Harden was.

When you draft a player 3rd overall and you were still bringing him off the bench going into his 4th year, that tells you something about what the organization sees in him. Its not a Jason Terry/Manu situation, where those guys come off the bench because they are past their prime, and neither was the 3rd overall pick.

And the idea that it doesn't matter who starts its who finishes is BS. How you set the tone on defense to start games usually determines how the rest of the game plays out.

Manu's been going off the bench since at least 2007. Are you suggesting he was past his prime then?
But do you know what they call a fool, who's full of himself and jumps into the path of death because it's cool?
COY0607
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,910
And1: 2,123
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
     

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1086 » by COY0607 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Zedders wrote:REGULAR SEASON

OKC offense w/James Harden: 114.96 points per 100 possessions
OKC offense w/o James Harden: 100.84 points per 100 possessions

PLAYOFFS

OKC offense w/James Harden: 115.13 points per 100 possessions
OKC offense w/o James Harden: 102.46 points per 100 possessions



misleading numbers, of course your offence is going to better when you replace a specialist defender (shefalosha) with a specialist offensive player.... their offensive numbers will be significantly improved when martin is on the floor as opposed to thabo shefalosha as well
Guy986
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 647
Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Location: BBG Nation unite!

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1087 » by Guy986 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:51 pm

FlipTSO wrote:
BrooklynBulls wrote:
FlipTSO wrote:
Because Harden is a defensive liability?


And you surmise that if Martin starts, he is not?


I surmise that if they start Martin, it says to me they think he's a better starting SG than they thought Harden was.

When you draft a player 3rd overall and you were still bringing him off the bench going into his 4th year, that tells you something about what the organization sees in him. Its not a Jason Terry/Manu situation, where those guys come off the bench because they are past their prime, and neither was the 3rd overall pick.

And the idea that it doesn't matter who starts its who finishes is BS. How you set the tone on defense to start games usually determines how the rest of the game plays out.


If the thunder start Kevin Martin it reinforces the notion that James Harden was brought off the bench to balance the offense. They needed somebody who could make plays, handle the ball and initiate the offense for the 2nd unit. Harden just happens to be one of the best at the 2 guard.

Martin has no such ability, him off the bench wouldn't bring the same benefit.
NickAnderson
General Manager
Posts: 7,889
And1: 2,922
Joined: Jul 11, 2009
Location: Club Space
     

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1088 » by NickAnderson » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:52 pm

Harden is a great, great player but not worth a max deal, sorry. Having Martin and Lamb will be just as good as harden because of there scoring AND it gives KD more touches.

They'll have room for more flexibility in the future and Lamb looks like he will be a STUD.
black bart
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 40
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1089 » by black bart » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:04 pm

thabo played 21 minutes per game. Harden played 31 minutes. That is all that is needed to be said about who they thought was better. The reason why harden came off the bench was because he is one of the best offensive players in the league. They are able to score effectively and rest durant and westbrook. The better players play more minutes.
User avatar
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 649
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: gone phishing

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1090 » by Frank Mulely » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:11 pm

I hate this trade for OKC. Intellectually I'm sure it makes sense but to me you have a core group of young guys all drafted and developed together that makes the finals then you trade one....just doesn't feel right.
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
black bart
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 40
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1091 » by black bart » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:14 pm

Frank Mulely wrote:I hate this trade for OKC. Intellectually I'm sure it makes sense but to me you have a core group of young guys all drafted and developed together that makes the finals then you trade one....just doesn't feel right.

Doesn't make sense intellectually either. This was a salary dump to avoid taxes.
User avatar
Neutral 123
RealGM
Posts: 11,500
And1: 2,881
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
Location: Pandora

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1092 » by Neutral 123 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:16 pm

Mehar wrote:First of all Harden is a fine player, but he is not a MAX player. People are criticizing Presti, but down the line paying Harden the max would have hampered their cap situation. Let us see how Harden does when he does not have the likes of Durant, and Westbrook alongside of him. Good for Harden to get the contract he did get. Not bad for a 6th man.

SMH, he's far better than anyone on the Raptors. The Thunder were title contenders only because they could have someone like him coming off the bench. Now they have Kevin Martin? Oh dear...
.
User avatar
JunkYardSubs
General Manager
Posts: 9,814
And1: 149
Joined: Apr 24, 2011

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1093 » by JunkYardSubs » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:18 pm

Neutral 123 wrote:
Mehar wrote:First of all Harden is a fine player, but he is not a MAX player. People are criticizing Presti, but down the line paying Harden the max would have hampered their cap situation. Let us see how Harden does when he does not have the likes of Durant, and Westbrook alongside of him. Good for Harden to get the contract he did get. Not bad for a 6th man.

SMH, he's far better than anyone on the Raptors. The Thunder were title contenders only because they could have someone like him coming off the bench. Now they have Kevin Martin? Oh dear...


So you troll the general board too?
Image
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1094 » by BrooklynBulls » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:19 pm

FlipTSO wrote:I surmise that if they start Martin, it says to me they think he's a better starting SG than they thought Harden was.


Ok. In what ways specifically do you surmise, or do you believe the THUNDER surmise, Martin is better than Harden? And if Martin is indeed better, man must you feel that Houston is insane to trade him straight up for Harden, let alone give him the ultramax.
When you draft a player 3rd overall and you were still bringing him off the bench going into his 4th year, that tells you something about what the organization sees in him. Its not a Jason Terry/Manu situation, where those guys come off the bench because they are past their prime, and neither was the 3rd overall pick.

Jason Terry and Manu Ginobili came off the bench in their primes.

And the idea that it doesn't matter who starts its who finishes is BS. How you set the tone on defense to start games usually determines how the rest of the game plays out.


I agree with you. Thabo is there to try to frustrate opposing perimeter scorers and stop their momentum before it begins. Once a shooter gets rolling, they're hard to stop. It's best to never let them start. I agree that that's the reason why Harden doesn't start.
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,807
And1: 4,646
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1095 » by mg » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:20 pm

Haven't read the entire thread but think it's a great deal for both teams. After Harden turned down that last deal you know the media was going to make his contract status a huge distraction this season.

It's been obvious for awhile that OKC couldn't pay all their stars. After Harden rejected the last offer this type of deal is the best fit since they get an instant replacement for Harden who just happens to be on an expiring contract. They get a future potential stud in Lamb, a lottery pick, plus 2 other picks. OKC is already the best team in the WC so it's not often those types of teams can acquire a lottery pick. Presti is a smart cookie and would not have dealt Harden in the division unless Houston was offering by far the best deal.

As for Morey it's been evident for awhile they've been biding their time waiting to trade assets for a star player. Personally I don't think Harden will be enough. I like alot of their young players but they still need to acquire a franchise player thru the draft or FA.
User avatar
Neutral 123
RealGM
Posts: 11,500
And1: 2,881
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
Location: Pandora

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1096 » by Neutral 123 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:22 pm

JunkYardSubs wrote:
Neutral 123 wrote:
Mehar wrote:First of all Harden is a fine player, but he is not a MAX player. People are criticizing Presti, but down the line paying Harden the max would have hampered their cap situation. Let us see how Harden does when he does not have the likes of Durant, and Westbrook alongside of him. Good for Harden to get the contract he did get. Not bad for a 6th man.

SMH, he's far better than anyone on the Raptors. The Thunder were title contenders only because they could have someone like him coming off the bench. Now they have Kevin Martin? Oh dear...


So you troll the general board too?

Are you disagreeing or just posting to post?
.
User avatar
Neutral 123
RealGM
Posts: 11,500
And1: 2,881
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
Location: Pandora

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1097 » by Neutral 123 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:24 pm

mg wrote:Haven't read the entire thread but think it's a great deal for both teams. After Harden turned down that last deal you know the media was going to make his contract status a huge distraction this season.

It's been obvious for awhile that OKC couldn't pay all their stars. After Harden rejected the last offer this type of deal is the best fit since they get an instant replacement for Harden who just happens to be on an expiring contract. They get a future potential stud in Lamb, a lottery pick, plus 2 other picks. OKC is already the best team in the WC so it's not often those types of teams can acquire a lottery pick. Presti is a smart cookie and would not have dealt Harden in the division unless Houston was offering by far the best deal.

As for Morey it's been evident for awhile they've been biding their time waiting to trade assets for a star player. Personally I don't think Harden will be enough. I like alot of their young players but they still need to acquire a franchise player thru the draft or FA.

It might be time to reevaluate what type of cookie this Presti is. Unless this was a direct demand they not just give him the max, when they were so close to it anyways, trading him makes no sense. Hell, trading him now makes no sense anyways.
.
User avatar
[GR]
RealGM
Posts: 16,435
And1: 1,947
Joined: Apr 22, 2011
       

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1098 » by [GR] » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:40 pm

Bill Simmons ‏@sportsguy33

OKC has everyone thinking they're a mom & pop store, meanwhile they made 30-35 million profit last year + could sell team for $550m easy.
Image
User avatar
JellosJigglin
RealGM
Posts: 15,576
And1: 9,619
Joined: Jul 14, 2004

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1099 » by JellosJigglin » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:41 pm

Always a gamble when you break up a championship contending team. They were in position to win now. Now they're banking on the future.
TheCage4
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,638
And1: 681
Joined: Aug 22, 2001
Location: NY
       

Re: James Harden traded to the Rockets 

Post#1100 » by TheCage4 » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:43 pm

This move reaffirms, at least to me, why Presti is king of the GM hill.

Harden is great, but he was a non factor when the Thunder needed him the most in the Finals. To demand a maximum contract & then quibble over $5-$6 million in difference, especially after failing to perform on the big stage is ridiculous.

Kudos to Presti & the Thunder organization. They turned what could of been a season long distraction into valuable pieces. Kevin Martin has been forgotten in Houston, but is still a skilled offensive weapon & a huge expiring contract. Lamb has potential, & then you add two 1sts.

OKC is in a great position & will not miss a beat.
“And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission.” -V

Return to The General Board