DrModesty wrote:Bum Adebayo wrote:DrModesty wrote:How much of Embiid's scoring advantage is just because of increased usage? I didn't realize his was so high.
39.0% Embiid (1st)
36.3% Luka (2nd)
33.3% Giannis (3rd)
32.8% SGA (4th)
29.3% Jokic (22nd)
Makes a lot of sense that Jokic is further back in this stat given his propensity to pass. On the other hand Luka's high usage rate makes sense given the detritus around him plus Kyrie's missed games. Giannis and SGA are effectively leading the pack/peloton as opposed to Embiid and Luka's outlier usage rates.
The gap between Embiid (1st) and Giannis (3rd) , is the same gap as Giannis (3rd) and Jamal Murray (30th). The gap between Embiid and Jokic is the same as the gap between Jokic (22nd) and Jaime Jaquez Jr (103rd).
But in this case it's more than justified, his playmaking has improved a lot this year, it's not just a case of increasing scoring while maintaining or worsening assists and turnovers.
Yeah, Phillies record easily justifies the playstyle. I just found it illuminating.
To say his scoring advantage is because of increased usage is the equivalent of saying his scoring advantage is because he takes more shots. Usage rate is calculated using simple box score. But stating it that way is a far less defensible position and sounds more nonsensical. Especially given he is averaging that PPG on 65% TS. Which is pretty much around the same as the highest TS%s in the league. This is miles above league average so any amount of increased volume on it is a huge benefit. Would it be better if he scored 0 PPG on 0 attempts? I don't understand the logic.
Player tracking wise, Jokic gets the most touches in the league at 99.4 per game and holds the ball for 2.76 secs per touch. Embiid gets 75.9 touches per game and holds the ball for 2.72 seconds per touch.















