_AIJ_ wrote:Why didnt Poole play the last 6 mins or so?
Looked like foot/ankle injury.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
_AIJ_ wrote:Why didnt Poole play the last 6 mins or so?
Free Rider wrote:donnieme wrote:Westbrook really should be handling the ball ahead of rondo, not because he's better at running offense (he's actually worse) but because he badly needs a niche on this team. He isn't even top 2 at any of scoring, rebounding or playmaking on the Lakers, just let him have something to do so it's not a waste of 40m.
They've got to stagger his minutes so he's primarily playing with the second unit. He's redundant as a starter next to LeBron and AD and whoever they have starting at center on any given night. The bulk of his minutes should be with the bench players where he handle the ball a lot more.
DTP wrote:GeorgeSears wrote:Are we allowed to slander Russ' game now or do we have to shut up and "appreciate him" because he "plays hard"?
I mean he is who we thought he was. He'll be a huge PRO more times than a con but it's definitely going to take him some time to find his space on this team. He'll be alright.
zimpy27 wrote:Pachinko_ wrote:FNQ wrote:
To where? Who will take him?
Dunno, but if they have any picks there's this gentleman in Oklahoma, a collector...
I don't think Westbrook gets moved anywhere. They have to try make this work. It won't be worse than tonight on average.
God Squad wrote:deadfeather wrote:J-Ves wrote:Are you insane?? you don't think the 6ers can do better than Russ for Simmons? There is no way the 6ers would entertain that deal for a second
Sixers couldn't get Dame or Beal for Simmons and you think they could get Russ!?
Hell yah they could get Russ. lol wtf. Russ isn't on Dame or Beal level and doesn't carry the same value. Lakers would laugh and accept a Russ for Simmons swap. It's the Sixers that would hang up.
Lalouie wrote:art_tatum wrote:Bruh Lakers lose with AD and Brom playing as well as they can, while Steph was trash shooting. Not a good sign.
Warriors bench and Poole really did well.
Imo LeBron and Westbrook are not a good fit. Both too ball dominant
so my question is WHY does lebron have to be ball dominant???
are you(people in general) saying if lebron is not ball dominant he's useless? lebron is supposed to be the goat complete skillset player. if either of the two has to be ball dominant it has to be westbrook simply because that's the ONLY way he knows how to play. lebron otoh perplexes me. he should be able to do many things and shift his skills to accommodate russ.
if russ isn't 9rpg/10apg this season the lakers and lebron have wasted their time and lebron especially i would hold responsible as he should be ENABLING russ not shutting him down.
stillgotgame wrote:Free Rider wrote:donnieme wrote:Westbrook really should be handling the ball ahead of rondo, not because he's better at running offense (he's actually worse) but because he badly needs a niche on this team. He isn't even top 2 at any of scoring, rebounding or playmaking on the Lakers, just let him have something to do so it's not a waste of 40m.
They've got to stagger his minutes so he's primarily playing with the second unit. He's redundant as a starter next to LeBron and AD and whoever they have starting at center on any given night. The bulk of his minutes should be with the bench players where he handle the ball a lot more.
2nd unit, with Lebron off? What’s he gonna do, play 15 minutes a game. He’ll lose his cool if they do it, guaranteed.
Free Rider wrote:donnieme wrote:Westbrook really should be handling the ball ahead of rondo, not because he's better at running offense (he's actually worse) but because he badly needs a niche on this team. He isn't even top 2 at any of scoring, rebounding or playmaking on the Lakers, just let him have something to do so it's not a waste of 40m.
They've got to stagger his minutes so he's primarily playing with the second unit. He's redundant as a starter next to LeBron and AD and whoever they have starting at center on any given night. The bulk of his minutes should be with the bench players where he handle the ball a lot more.
whatisacenter wrote:God Squad wrote:deadfeather wrote:
Sixers couldn't get Dame or Beal for Simmons and you think they could get Russ!?
Hell yah they could get Russ. lol wtf. Russ isn't on Dame or Beal level and doesn't carry the same value. Lakers would laugh and accept a Russ for Simmons swap. It's the Sixers that would hang up.
the Lakers would rush Westy to the airport for Simmons...
Kurtz wrote:GSP wrote:Kurtz wrote:
Warriors won't be good defensively this year, Lakers just suck offensively right now. 0-6 preseason and just ugly iso offense with no 3pt shooting right now.
They won't be top 5 but not good?
It's basically the same team except swapping Oubre, Paschall (bad defender) and Bazemore for Iggy, Otto and Bjelica. And getting Klay back. Unless you're incredibly high on Bazemores defense why do you think their D won't be good?
Given his massive leg injuries and absence from the league for 2 years, I don't think Klay will be able to play defense this year. I think he will still hit his 3s, but defensively it'll take him a year to get back.
I don't think Bjelica is a good defender, and Wiseman and Kuminga are poor as well when they get back.
They'll be average defensively just like last year, I expect.
But we'll see.
Lalouie wrote:art_tatum wrote:Bruh Lakers lose with AD and Brom playing as well as they can, while Steph was trash shooting. Not a good sign.
Warriors bench and Poole really did well.
Imo LeBron and Westbrook are not a good fit. Both too ball dominant
so my question is WHY does lebron have to be ball dominant???
are you(people in general) saying if lebron is not ball dominant he's useless? lebron is supposed to be the goat complete skillset player. if either of the two has to be ball dominant it has to be westbrook simply because that's the ONLY way he knows how to play. lebron otoh perplexes me. he should be able to do many things and shift his skills to accommodate russ.
if russ isn't 9rpg/10apg this season the lakers and lebron have wasted their time and lebron especially i would hold responsible as he should be ENABLING russ not shutting him down.
Lalouie wrote:art_tatum wrote:Bruh Lakers lose with AD and Brom playing as well as they can, while Steph was trash shooting. Not a good sign.
Warriors bench and Poole really did well.
Imo LeBron and Westbrook are not a good fit. Both too ball dominant
so my question is WHY does lebron have to be ball dominant???
are you(people in general) saying if lebron is not ball dominant he's useless? lebron is supposed to be the goat complete skillset player. if either of the two has to be ball dominant it has to be westbrook simply because that's the ONLY way he knows how to play. lebron otoh perplexes me. he should be able to do many things and shift his skills to accommodate russ.
if russ isn't 9rpg/10apg this season the lakers and lebron have wasted their time and lebron especially i would hold responsible as he should be ENABLING russ not shutting him down.
GSP wrote:Kurtz wrote:GSP wrote:
They won't be top 5 but not good?
It's basically the same team except swapping Oubre, Paschall (bad defender) and Bazemore for Iggy, Otto and Bjelica. And getting Klay back. Unless you're incredibly high on Bazemores defense why do you think their D won't be good?
Given his massive leg injuries and absence from the league for 2 years, I don't think Klay will be able to play defense this year. I think he will still hit his 3s, but defensively it'll take him a year to get back.
I don't think Bjelica is a good defender, and Wiseman and Kuminga are poor as well when they get back.
They'll be average defensively just like last year, I expect.
But we'll see.
Average last year?![]()
![]()
Youre aware they were a top 5 defense last year right.......
GSP wrote:Kurtz wrote:GSP wrote:
They won't be top 5 but not good?
It's basically the same team except swapping Oubre, Paschall (bad defender) and Bazemore for Iggy, Otto and Bjelica. And getting Klay back. Unless you're incredibly high on Bazemores defense why do you think their D won't be good?
Given his massive leg injuries and absence from the league for 2 years, I don't think Klay will be able to play defense this year. I think he will still hit his 3s, but defensively it'll take him a year to get back.
I don't think Bjelica is a good defender, and Wiseman and Kuminga are poor as well when they get back.
They'll be average defensively just like last year, I expect.
But we'll see.
Average last year?![]()
![]()
Youre aware they were a top 5 defense last year right.......
Doctor MJ wrote:Reeko wrote:Skip was so accurate when he said that Westbrook is the perfect scape goat for LeBron if the Lakers fail this season.
I don't understand the concept of a scapegoat here.
1. For LeBron, things have to be championship or bust. Excuses aren't going to sway anyone to his side.
2. Whether or not LeBron in fact acts as GM, everything that happens is something he lets happen.
3. "Scapegoat" generally implies that what you did wasn't actually the cause of a lot of damage but you're being framed for it anyway. I don't know why Westbrook would require such framing. His potential for negative impact this year is quite considerable. If at the end of the season there's reason to cast blame, Westbrook will almost certainly warrant a sizable portion of it.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
DCasey91 wrote:Lalouie wrote:art_tatum wrote:Bruh Lakers lose with AD and Brom playing as well as they can, while Steph was trash shooting. Not a good sign.
Warriors bench and Poole really did well.
Imo LeBron and Westbrook are not a good fit. Both too ball dominant
so my question is WHY does lebron have to be ball dominant???
are you(people in general) saying if lebron is not ball dominant he's useless? lebron is supposed to be the goat complete skillset player. if either of the two has to be ball dominant it has to be westbrook simply because that's the ONLY way he knows how to play. lebron otoh perplexes me. he should be able to do many things and shift his skills to accommodate russ.
if russ isn't 9rpg/10apg this season the lakers and lebron have wasted their time and lebron especially i would hold responsible as he should be ENABLING russ not shutting him down.
Did you watch the game? Westbrook did nothing and was a negative once he set foot on the floor. Lebron can’t enable Westbrook’s crap defensive effort either.
Just put him on the bench and stagger him.
Don’t cater to a worse player that’s not how sports or life in general works.
Tor_Raps wrote:Catchall wrote:AD with 39 mins. Lebron with 37 mins. No one else in double figures. These guys are going to need to carry a heavy load.
They're pegged as two top 5 players on the same team and we're supposed to feel sorry for them? Lol
GSP wrote:Kurtz wrote:GSP wrote:
They won't be top 5 but not good?
It's basically the same team except swapping Oubre, Paschall (bad defender) and Bazemore for Iggy, Otto and Bjelica. And getting Klay back. Unless you're incredibly high on Bazemores defense why do you think their D won't be good?
Given his massive leg injuries and absence from the league for 2 years, I don't think Klay will be able to play defense this year. I think he will still hit his 3s, but defensively it'll take him a year to get back.
I don't think Bjelica is a good defender, and Wiseman and Kuminga are poor as well when they get back.
They'll be average defensively just like last year, I expect.
But we'll see.
Average last year?![]()
![]()
Youre aware they were a top 5 defense last year right.......
Reeko wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Reeko wrote:Skip was so accurate when he said that Westbrook is the perfect scape goat for LeBron if the Lakers fail this season.
I don't understand the concept of a scapegoat here.
1. For LeBron, things have to be championship or bust. Excuses aren't going to sway anyone to his side.
2. Whether or not LeBron in fact acts as GM, everything that happens is something he lets happen.
3. "Scapegoat" generally implies that what you did wasn't actually the cause of a lot of damage but you're being framed for it anyway. I don't know why Westbrook would require such framing. His potential for negative impact this year is quite considerable. If at the end of the season there's reason to cast blame, Westbrook will almost certainly warrant a sizable portion of it.
Because even if LeBron doesn't play up to his own standards, his defenders will be able to look at Russ and say "Well he's playing with Russell Westbrook, who couldn't win with Harden, Durant or George. How can we expect LeBron in year 19, to win with him?"