Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
Wonder who's lying at this point
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using RealGM mobile app
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
Wonder who's lying at this point
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using RealGM mobile app
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
Great depression was around 25%.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using RealGM mobile app
ItsDanger wrote:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141569
"However, the amino acid sequence of COVID-19 differs from other coronaviruses specifically in the regions of 1ab polyprotein and surface glycoprotein or S-protein. Although several animals have been speculated to be a reservoir for COVID-19, no animal reservoir has been already confirmed."
As the biologist explained to us, a transfer between life forms may likely have 1 or even 2 changes in amino acids, its not likely to have more than 2 if it was natural. This SAR CoV 2 has more then 2 differences in amino acids. While not impossible to occur naturally, it does lean more towards synthetic. I believe its still inconclusive. Your linked articles don't even discuss this aspect. What do you think these people do in these labs all day?
In conclusion, we really need a vaccine and reportedly, its easier to develop if its man made.
2012NadalShadow wrote:
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:You resorting to ad hominem doesn't change anything I said bud. Nothing in that link you listed is more than educated guessing. It's shaky at best and we don't have enough information yet. Appeal to authority and other stuff you're using won't work.Pennebaker wrote:ClipsFanSince98 wrote:Listing a bunch of reputable scientists is nice, but doesn't prove a damn thing. I'm asking for more evidence. Because you sure as hell don't respect the scientists who are also top of their fields (such as the group of Indian scientists from a prestigious school), Israeli intelligence officers of 30 years specializing in biological weapons testing etc.
I've been studying science my whole life. Not just in a classroom, but hundreds, if not thousands of hours of my own research, just because I want to learn. Maybe my standards for science are higher than yours. Deduction is founded in logic, not science and is about 5% of an equation. I wouldn't run around saying deductive logic is scientific method.
It's like me telling you basketball is scoring.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using RealGM mobile app
So you mean never in a classroom and all of your thousands of hours of "research" has been you reading random things online. Gotcha.
Well I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it looks like your standards are far lower than you realize.
Your lifelong self motivated study of "science" has turned you into a conspiracy theorist whose theories wouldn't last 2 seconds if put under the same detailed scrutiny and evaluation by other experts in the field as the Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 paper was.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using RealGM mobile app
LKN wrote:Ayt wrote:LKN wrote:
I'm not sure anyone is lying. The Democrats though the Republican senate bill was crap so they refused to sign on.
It's just part of the process.
This is what one Democratic senator had to say about it.
Hopefully this isn't getting into partisan things here but a few of those are very important.
- Hospital money
Why do hospitals need money? They've been forced to cancel elective surgeries which is how they make money. Given the crazy lengths some are already going to we need to make sure they stay solvent.
- State and Local Governments
Why do they need money? State and Local governments depend on sales tax, tourism taxes, use taxes and income taxes. Several of these have fallen off massively - some close to zero. Unlike the federal government, states can not just print money. States can't buy masks and ventilators if they don't have money!
Crizzle wrote:i had to take a day off from this thread. Was there any "good" news today?
A third of coronavirus cases may be ‘silent carriers’, classified Chinese data suggests
- More than 43,000 people in China had tested positive without immediate symptoms by the end of February and were quarantined
- It is still unclear what role asymptomatic transmission is playing in the global pandemic
Richfield wrote:Crizzle wrote:i had to take a day off from this thread. Was there any "good" news today?
Crizzle wrote:
